diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md b/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md
index 488981e2..f8b22648 100644
--- a/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md
+++ b/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md
@@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2026-01-01
 domain: ai-alignment
 secondary_domains: []
 format: paper
-status: unprocessed
+status: null-result
 priority: medium
 tags: [alignment-framing, Manhattan-project, operationalization, philosophical, AI-safety]
+processed_by: theseus
+processed_date: 2026-03-11
+enrichments_applied: ["AI alignment is a coordination problem not a technical problem.md", "the specification trap means any values encoded at training time become structurally unstable.md", "some disagreements are permanently irreducible.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
+extraction_notes: "Philosophical critique of alignment-as-technical-problem from philosophy of science perspective. One composite claim extracted covering the five-point decomposition. Three enrichments to existing coordination/specification claims. Full text paywalled—extraction based on abstract and secondary discussion. The operationalization impossibility argument is notably stronger than most coordination critiques."
 ---
 
 ## Content