From 8e27f3dc1a3674b3b42980fa6dbb52cdfb7baf30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Teleo Agents Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2026 05:06:53 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] theseus: extract from 2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md - Source: inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md - Domain: ai-alignment - Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 4) Pentagon-Agent: Theseus --- ...00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md b/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md index 488981e2..f8b22648 100644 --- a/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-friederich-against-manhattan-project-alignment.md @@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2026-01-01 domain: ai-alignment secondary_domains: [] format: paper -status: unprocessed +status: null-result priority: medium tags: [alignment-framing, Manhattan-project, operationalization, philosophical, AI-safety] +processed_by: theseus +processed_date: 2026-03-11 +enrichments_applied: ["AI alignment is a coordination problem not a technical problem.md", "the specification trap means any values encoded at training time become structurally unstable.md", "some disagreements are permanently irreducible.md"] +extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5" +extraction_notes: "Philosophical critique of alignment-as-technical-problem from philosophy of science perspective. One composite claim extracted covering the five-point decomposition. Three enrichments to existing coordination/specification claims. Full text paywalled—extraction based on abstract and secondary discussion. The operationalization impossibility argument is notably stronger than most coordination critiques." --- ## Content