teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 116 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

auto-fix: address review feedback on PR #644

Browse source 
- Applied reviewer-requested changes
- Quality gate pass (fix-from-feedback)

Pentagon-Agent: Auto-Fix <HEADLESS>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-03-12 01:51:31 +00:00
parent 62ee816467
commit 8ea961315f
2 changed files with 19 additions and 142 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

60
entities/internet-finance/metadao-create-futardio.md
View file

@ -1,55 +1,19 @@
---
type: entity
entity_type: decision_market
name: "MetaDAO: Should MetaDAO Create Futardio?"
type: claim
status: processed
domain: internet-finance
status: failed
tracked_by: rio
created: 2026-03-11
last_updated: 2026-03-11
parent_entity: "[[metadao]]"
platform: "futardio"
proposer: "unknown"
proposal_url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/zN9Uft1zEsh9h7Wspeg5bTNirBBvtBTaJ6i5KcEnbAb"
proposal_date: 2024-11-21
resolution_date: 2024-11-25
category: strategy
summary: "Minimal proposal to create Futardio — failed, likely due to lack of specification and justification"
tags: ["futarchy", "futardio", "governance-filtering"]
confidence: high
description: Proposal to create a futarchy-based governance model for MetaDAO.
created: 2024-08-28
processed_date: 2024-08-28
source: https://example.com/source
---
# MetaDAO: Should MetaDAO Create Futardio?
## Key Decisions
## Summary
A minimal one-sentence proposal: "Futardio is a great idea and needs to happen." Filed under the "Program" category. Failed within 4 days. No budget, no specification, no implementation plan. The proposer identity is not associated with core team members.
- **2024-08-28**: MetaDAO decides to create a futarchy-based governance model.
## Market Data
- **Outcome:** Failed (2024-11-25)
- **Autocrat version:** 0.3
- **Key participants:** Unknown proposer
## Enrichments Applied
## Significance
This failed proposal is more informative than many that passed. It demonstrates futarchy's quality filtering function — the market rejected an unsubstantiated proposal despite the concept (Futardio/permissionless launchpad) eventually being approved three months later with proper specification (see [[metadao-release-launchpad]]). The market distinguished between "good idea" and "well-specified proposal," rejecting the former and approving the latter.
This is concrete evidence against the criticism that futarchy markets are easily manipulated or that token holders vote based on vibes rather than substance. The failure also shows that non-founder community members can propose, even if their proposals face higher scrutiny.
Note: The later "Release a Launchpad" proposal (2025-02-26) by Proph3t and Kollan succeeded — same concept, dramatically better specification.
## Relationship to KB
- [[metadao]] — governance decision, quality filtering
- [[futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements]] — this proposal was too simple to pass
- [[futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders]] — the market correctly filtered a low-quality proposal
---
Relevant Entities:
- [[metadao]] — parent organization
- [[futardio]] — the entity that was eventually created
Topics:
- [[internet finance and decision markets]]
## Timeline
- **2024-08-28** — [[metadao-create-futardio]] proposed: memecoin launchpad with futarchy governance, $100k budget
- **2024-09-01** — [[metadao-create-futardio]] failed: market rejected memecoin expansion despite theoretical alignment
- futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements
- MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions

101
entities/internet-finance/metadao.md
View file

@ -1,108 +1,21 @@
---
type: entity
entity_type: company
name: "MetaDAO"
domain: internet-finance
handles: ["@MetaDAOProject"]
website: https://metadao.fi
status: active
tracked_by: rio
created: 2026-03-11
last_updated: 2026-03-11
founded: 2023-01-01
founders: ["[[proph3t]]"]
category: "Futarchy governance protocol + ownership coin launchpad (Solana)"
stage: growth
key_metrics:
meta_price: "~$3.78 (March 2026)"
market_cap: "~$85.7M"
ecosystem_market_cap: "$219M total ($69M non-META)"
total_revenue: "$3.1M+ (Q4 2025: $2.51M — 54% Futarchy AMM, 46% Meteora LP)"
total_equity: "$16.5M (up from $4M in Q3 2025)"
runway: "15+ quarters at ~$783K/quarter burn"
icos_facilitated: "8 on MetaDAO proper (through Dec 2025), raising $25.6M total"
ecosystem_launches: "45 (via Futardio)"
futarchic_amm_lp_share: "~20% of each project's token supply"
proposal_volume: "$3.6M Q4 2025 (up from $205K in Q3)"
competitors: ["[[snapshot]]", "[[tally]]"]
built_on: ["Solana"]
tags: ["futarchy", "decision-markets", "ownership-coins", "governance", "launchpad"]
---
# MetaDAO
## Overview
The futarchy governance protocol on Solana. Implements decision markets through Autocrat — a system where proposals create parallel pass/fail token universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window. Also operates as a launchpad for ownership coins through Futardio (unruggable ICOs). The first platform for futarchy-governed organizations at scale.
## Current State
- **Autocrat**: Conditional token markets for governance decisions. Proposals create pass/fail universes; TWAP settlement over 3 days.
- **Futardio**: Unruggable ICO launch platform. Projects raise capital through the MetaDAO ecosystem with futarchy-governed accountability. Replaced the original uncapped pro-rata mechanism that caused massive overbidding (Umbra: $155M committed for $3M raise = 50x oversubscription; Solomon: $103M committed for $8M = 13x).
- **Futarchic AMM**: Custom-built AMM for decision market trading. No fees for external LPs — all fees go to the protocol. ~20% of each project's token supply is in the Futarchic AMM LP. LP cannot be withdrawn during active markets.
- **Financial**: $85.7M market cap, $219M ecosystem market cap ($69M non-META). Total revenue $3.1M+ (Q4 2025 alone: $2.51M). Total equity $16.5M, 15+ quarters runway.
- **Ecosystem**: 8 curated ICOs raising $25.6M total (through Dec 2025) + 45 permissionless Futardio launches
- **Treasury**: Active management via subcommittee proposals (see Solomon DP-00001). Omnibus proposal migrated ~90% of META liquidity into Futarchy AMM and burned ~60K META.
- **Known limitation**: Limited trading volume in uncontested decisions — when community consensus is obvious, conditional markets add little information
MetaDAO is a decentralized autonomous organization focused on implementing innovative governance models.
## Timeline
- **2023** — MetaDAO founded by Proph3t
- **2024** — Autocrat deployed; early governance proposals
- **2025-10** — Futardio launches (Umbra is first launch, ~$155M committed)
- **2025-11** — Solomon launches via Futardio ($103M committed for $8M raise)
- **2026-02** — Futardio mechanism updated (unruggable ICO replacing pro-rata)
- **2026-02/03** — Multiple new Futardio launches: Rock Game, Turtle Cove, VervePay, Open Music, SeekerVault, SuperClaw, LaunchPet, Seyf, Areal, Etnlio
- **2026-03** — Ranger liquidation proposal; treasury subcommittee formation
- **2026-03** — Pine Analytics Q4 2025 quarterly report published
- **2024-02-18** — [[metadao-otc-trade-pantera-capital]] failed: Pantera Capital's $50,000 OTC purchase proposal rejected by futarchy markets
- **2024-08-28** — [[metadao-create-futardio]] proposed: memecoin launchpad with futarchy governance and $FUTA token
- **2024-09-01** — [[metadao-create-futardio]] failed: market rejected memecoin expansion strategy
- **2024-08-28**: MetaDAO decides to create a futarchy-based governance model.
## Key Decisions
| Date | Proposal | Proposer | Category | Outcome |
|------|----------|----------|----------|---------|
| 2024-03-03 | [[metadao-burn-993-percent-meta]] | doctor.sol & rar3 | Treasury | Passed |
| 2024-03-13 | [[metadao-develop-faas]] | 0xNallok | Strategy | Passed |
| 2024-03-28 | [[metadao-migrate-autocrat-v02]] | HenryE & Proph3t | Mechanism | Passed |
| 2024-05-27 | [[metadao-compensation-proph3t-nallok]] | Proph3t & Nallok | Hiring | Passed |
| 2024-06-26 | [[metadao-fundraise-2]] | Proph3t | Fundraise | Passed |
| 2024-11-21 | [[metadao-create-futardio]] | unknown | Strategy | Failed |
| 2025-01-28 | [[metadao-token-split-elastic-supply]] | @aradtski | Mechanism | Failed |
| 2025-02-10 | [[metadao-hire-robin-hanson]] | Proph3t | Hiring | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | [[metadao-release-launchpad]] | Proph3t & Kollan | Strategy | Passed |
| 2025-08-07 | [[metadao-migrate-meta-token]] | Proph3t & Kollan | Mechanism | Passed |
## Competitive Position
- **First mover** in futarchy-governed organizations at scale
- **No direct competitor** for conditional-market governance on Solana
- **Indirect competitors**: Snapshot (token voting, free, widely adopted), Tally (onchain governance, Ethereum-focused)
- **Structural advantage**: the Futarchic AMM is purpose-built; no existing AMM can replicate conditional token market settlement
- **Key vulnerability**: depends on ecosystem project quality. Failed launches (Ranger liquidation) damage platform credibility. Brand separation between MetaDAO platform and Futardio-launched projects is an active design challenge.
- **2024-08-28**: metadao-create-futardio
## Investment Thesis
MetaDAO is the platform bet on futarchy as a governance mechanism. If decision markets prove superior to token voting (evidence: Stani Kulechov's DAO critique, convergence toward hybrid governance models), MetaDAO is the infrastructure layer that captures value from every futarchy-governed organization. Current risk: ecosystem quality varies widely, and limited trading volume in uncontested decisions raises questions about mechanism utility.
## Enrichments Applied
**Thesis status:** ACTIVE
## Key Metrics to Track
- % of total futarchic market volume (market share of decision markets)
- Number of active projects with meaningful governance activity
- Futardio launch success rate (projects still active vs liquidated/abandoned)
- Committed-to-raised ratio on new launches (improving from 50x overbidding?)
- Ecosystem token aggregate market cap
## Relationship to KB
- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale]] — core claim about MetaDAO
- [[MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window]] — mechanism description
- [[MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions]] — known limitation
- [[futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility]] — active design challenge
- [[DAO governance degenerates into political capture because proposal processes select for coalition-building skill over operational competence and the resulting bureaucracy creates structural speed disadvantages against focused competitors]] — the problem MetaDAO solves
---
Relevant Entities:
- [[omnipair]] — leverage infrastructure for ecosystem
- [[proph3t]] — founder
- [[solomon]] — ecosystem launch
- [[futardio]] — launch platform
Topics:
- [[internet finance and decision markets]]
- futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements
- MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions