auto-fix: strip 45 broken wiki links
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents
Teleo Pipeline
parent
b7f45bdece
commit
946c7008cf
5 changed files with 14 additions and 14 deletions
|
|
@ -38,13 +38,13 @@ The "Claude Code founders" framing is significant. The solo AI-native builder
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
|
||||
*Source: [[2026-01-01-futardio-launch-mycorealms]] | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
|
||||
*Source: 2026-01-01-futardio-launch-mycorealms | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
|
||||
|
||||
MycoRealms demonstrates 72-hour permissionless raise window on Futardio for $125,000 USDC with automatic deployment: if target reached, treasury/spending limits/liquidity deploy automatically; if target missed, full refunds execute automatically. No gatekeepers, no due diligence bottleneck — market pricing determines success. This compresses what would traditionally be a multi-month fundraising process (pitch deck preparation, investor meetings, term sheet negotiation, legal documentation, wire transfers) into a 3-day permissionless window. Notably, this includes physical infrastructure (mushroom farm) not just digital projects.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
|
||||
*Source: [[2026-03-03-futardio-launch-futardio-cult]] | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
|
||||
*Source: 2026-03-03-futardio-launch-futardio-cult | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
|
||||
|
||||
Futardio cult raised $11.4M in under 24 hours through MetaDAO's futarchy platform (launched 2026-03-03, closed 2026-03-04), confirming sub-day fundraising timelines for futarchy-governed launches. This provides concrete timing data supporting the compression thesis: traditional meme coin launches through centralized platforms typically require days to weeks for comparable capital formation.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -46,6 +46,6 @@ Relevant Notes:
|
|||
- [[collective intelligence requires diversity as a structural precondition not a moral preference]]
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[domains/internet-finance/_map]]
|
||||
- [[core/mechanisms/_map]]
|
||||
- [[foundations/collective-intelligence/_map]]
|
||||
- domains/internet-finance/_map
|
||||
- core/mechanisms/_map
|
||||
- foundations/collective-intelligence/_map
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -29,8 +29,8 @@ This pattern likely generalizes to other curated launch platforms. High selectiv
|
|||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale]]
|
||||
- [[internet capital markets compress fundraising from months to days because permissionless raises eliminate gatekeepers while futarchy replaces due diligence bottlenecks with real-time market pricing]]
|
||||
- [[futarchy-governed-permissionless-launches-require-brand-separation-to-manage-reputational-liability-because-failed-projects-on-a-curated-platform-damage-the-platforms-credibility]]
|
||||
- futarchy-governed-permissionless-launches-require-brand-separation-to-manage-reputational-liability-because-failed-projects-on-a-curated-platform-damage-the-platforms-credibility
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[domains/internet-finance/_map]]
|
||||
- [[core/mechanisms/_map]]
|
||||
- domains/internet-finance/_map
|
||||
- core/mechanisms/_map
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -34,9 +34,9 @@ This represents a novel coordination design—using social proof and reputation
|
|||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale]]
|
||||
- [[futarchy-governed-permissionless-launches-require-brand-separation-to-manage-reputational-liability-because-failed-projects-on-a-curated-platform-damage-the-platforms-credibility]]
|
||||
- [[Teleocap makes capital formation permissionless by letting anyone propose investment terms while AI agents evaluate debate and futarchy determines funding]]
|
||||
- futarchy-governed-permissionless-launches-require-brand-separation-to-manage-reputational-liability-because-failed-projects-on-a-curated-platform-damage-the-platforms-credibility
|
||||
- Teleocap makes capital formation permissionless by letting anyone propose investment terms while AI agents evaluate debate and futarchy determines funding
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[domains/internet-finance/_map]]
|
||||
- [[core/mechanisms/_map]]
|
||||
- domains/internet-finance/_map
|
||||
- core/mechanisms/_map
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -51,12 +51,12 @@ MetaDAO has publicly debated whether to preserve curated launches or move to per
|
|||
**Why this matters:** The curated-to-permissionless transition is the key strategic inflection for MetaDAO. The "verified launch" mechanism is a novel coordination design — reputation-based trust networks layered on permissionless infrastructure. This is mechanism design, not just business strategy.
|
||||
**What surprised me:** Revenue declined sharply since mid-December — the cadence problem is real and urgent. The curated model creates feast-or-famine dynamics. This is the strongest evidence that permissionless scaling is necessary, not just desirable.
|
||||
**What I expected but didn't find:** Specific timeline for permissionless launch rollout. Details on how the "verified launch" trust layer would work mechanistically.
|
||||
**KB connections:** [[Teleocap makes capital formation permissionless by letting anyone propose investment terms while AI agents evaluate debate and futarchy determines funding]] — MetaDAO's permissionless transition validates the Teleocap design thesis.
|
||||
**KB connections:** Teleocap makes capital formation permissionless by letting anyone propose investment terms while AI agents evaluate debate and futarchy determines funding — MetaDAO's permissionless transition validates the Teleocap design thesis.
|
||||
**Extraction hints:** Claim about verified launches as mechanism design compromise. Claim about revenue cadence as forcing function for permissionless transition.
|
||||
**Context:** Blockworks article (behind 403 paywall) is the primary source. KuCoin and Delphi Digital summaries corroborate. The "strategic reset" was flagged in Session 1 but details were unknown.
|
||||
|
||||
## Curator Notes (structured handoff for extractor)
|
||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[Teleocap makes capital formation permissionless by letting anyone propose investment terms while AI agents evaluate debate and futarchy determines funding]]
|
||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: Teleocap makes capital formation permissionless by letting anyone propose investment terms while AI agents evaluate debate and futarchy determines funding
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: The curated → permissionless transition with verified trust layer is a novel mechanism design. Revenue cadence problem validates why permissionless is necessary. The "DAO of DAOs" vision directly relates to MetaDAO's platform thesis.
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on (1) verified launch as mechanism design (reputation trust + permissionless infrastructure), (2) revenue cadence as evidence for permissionless necessity, (3) "DAO of DAOs" vision as attractor state.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue