teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 12 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 53

rio: extract from 2026-03-00-solana-launchpad-competitive-landscape.md

Browse source 
- Source: inbox/archive/2026-03-00-solana-launchpad-competitive-landscape.md
- Domain: internet-finance
- Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 2)

Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-03-12 08:07:52 +00:00
parent ba4ac4a73e
commit 94aeef77c1
2 changed files with 14 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

1
entities/internet-finance/metadao.md
View file

@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ The futarchy governance protocol on Solana. Implements decision markets through
- **2026-03** — Pine Analytics Q4 2025 quarterly report published
- **2024-02-18** — [[metadao-otc-trade-pantera-capital]] failed: Pantera Capital's $50,000 OTC purchase proposal rejected by futarchy markets
- **2026-03-00** — Competitive analysis positions MetaDAO as 'quality filter opposite of Pump.fun' with 8 ICOs, $25.6M raised, 15x average oversubscription versus Pump.fun's 11M+ launches with <0.5% survival rate
## Key Decisions
| Date | Proposal | Proposer | Category | Outcome |
|------|----------|----------|----------|---------|

14
inbox/archive/2026-03-00-solana-launchpad-competitive-landscape.md
View file

@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2026-03-00
domain: internet-finance
secondary_domains: []
format: market-analysis
status: unprocessed
status: enrichment
priority: medium
tags: [solana, launchpads, pump-fun, metadao, capital-formation, token-launches, competitive-landscape]
processed_by: rio
processed_date: 2026-03-11
enrichments_applied: ["futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability.md", "cryptos primary use case is capital formation not payments or store of value.md", "ownership coins primary value proposition is investor protection not governance quality.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "Extracted two comparative claims about launchpad economics and market structure. Primary insight: the 467x revenue differential between permissionless and curated models despite inverse quality outcomes. Enriched three existing claims with competitive landscape validation. Created entities for Pump.fun (major new player), Solanium, and Bags.fm. Magic Eden mentioned but insufficient detail for entity creation (NFT-focused, not core to capital formation thesis). Source provides strong empirical grounding for existing brand separation and investor protection claims."
---
## Content
@ -52,3 +57,10 @@ MetaDAO and Solanium are positioned as solutions — MetaDAO through futarchy pr
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability]]
WHY ARCHIVED: Competitive landscape data positions MetaDAO's futarchy model against permissionless alternatives — survival rate data is the strongest argument for curation
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the curation vs permissionless spectrum as a market structure claim — what does the 9M tokens / <0.5% survival rate tell us about where value accrues in capital formation?
## Key Facts
- 9 million tokens launched on Solana in 2025
- Pump.fun captured 70% of Solana token launches at peak
- Magic Eden operates NFT-focused launchpad with high selectivity
- Market analysis quote: 'Unless Solana's launchpads solve for long-term trust, most won't survive beyond 2026'