From 985d25e99307cab09b2a5e2f245e13e62aa4f956 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Teleo Agents Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2026 12:39:51 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] fix: strip code fences from LLM fixer output --- ...-and-ai-alignment-converge-on-explainability-requirements.md | 2 -- 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/domains/ai-alignment/international-humanitarian-law-and-ai-alignment-converge-on-explainability-requirements.md b/domains/ai-alignment/international-humanitarian-law-and-ai-alignment-converge-on-explainability-requirements.md index c914cfe86..9fdbf2847 100644 --- a/domains/ai-alignment/international-humanitarian-law-and-ai-alignment-converge-on-explainability-requirements.md +++ b/domains/ai-alignment/international-humanitarian-law-and-ai-alignment-converge-on-explainability-requirements.md @@ -1,4 +1,3 @@ -```json { "action": "flag_duplicate", "candidates": [ @@ -7,4 +6,3 @@ ], "reasoning": "The reviewer identified 'legal-and-alignment-communities-converge-on-AI-value-judgment-impossibility.md' as a semantic duplicate, stating that both claims assert the same thesis: IHL analysis and AI alignment research independently converged on the same fundamental limitation of autonomous systems. The new claim narrows to 'predictability/explainability' while the existing one frames it as 'value judgment impossibility,' but the structural argument is identical. The reviewer also mentioned 'autonomous-weapons-violate-existing-IHL-because-proportionality-requires-human-judgment.md' as a related claim that already has a 'supports' edge pointing to the convergence claim, further indicating duplication of territory." } -``` \ No newline at end of file