diff --git a/entities/internet-finance/avici.md b/entities/internet-finance/avici.md index 75ebee2e..015d03a6 100644 --- a/entities/internet-finance/avici.md +++ b/entities/internet-finance/avici.md @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ status: active tracked_by: rio created: 2026-03-11 last_updated: 2026-03-11 -parent: "[[futardio]]" +parent: "futardio" category: "Distributed internet banking infrastructure (Solana)" stage: growth funding: "$3.5M raised via Futardio ICO" @@ -35,13 +35,13 @@ Distributed internet banking infrastructure — onchain credit scoring, spend ca - **2026-00-00** — Demonstrated 4.7% holder churn during 65% drawdown (lost only 600 of 12,752 holders), cited as evidence of genuine community ownership versus speculative holding in 2026 crypto trends analysis ## Relationship to KB -- [[futardio]] — launched on Futardio platform +- futardio — launched on Futardio platform - [[cryptos primary use case is capital formation not payments or store of value because permissionless token issuance solves the fundraising bottleneck that solo founders and small teams face]] — test case for banking-focused crypto raising via permissionless ICO --- Relevant Entities: -- [[futardio]] — launch platform +- futardio — launch platform - [[metadao]] — parent ecosystem Topics: diff --git a/entities/internet-finance/metadao.md b/entities/internet-finance/metadao.md index 0c63a8fc..b1a770bb 100644 --- a/entities/internet-finance/metadao.md +++ b/entities/internet-finance/metadao.md @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ tracked_by: rio created: 2026-03-11 last_updated: 2026-03-11 founded: 2023-01-01 -founders: ["[[proph3t]]"] +founders: ["proph3t"] category: "Futarchy governance protocol + ownership coin launchpad (Solana)" stage: growth key_metrics: @@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ key_metrics: ecosystem_launches: "45 (via Futardio)" futarchic_amm_lp_share: "~20% of each project's token supply" proposal_volume: "$3.6M Q4 2025 (up from $205K in Q3)" -competitors: ["[[snapshot]]", "[[tally]]"] +competitors: ["snapshot", "tally"] built_on: ["Solana"] tags: ["futarchy", "decision-markets", "ownership-coins", "governance", "launchpad"] --- @@ -53,21 +53,21 @@ The futarchy governance protocol on Solana. Implements decision markets through - **2026-03** — Ranger liquidation proposal; treasury subcommittee formation - **2026-03** — Pine Analytics Q4 2025 quarterly report published -- **2024-02-18** — [[metadao-otc-trade-pantera-capital]] failed: Pantera Capital's $50,000 OTC purchase proposal rejected by futarchy markets +- **2024-02-18** — metadao-otc-trade-pantera-capital failed: Pantera Capital's $50,000 OTC purchase proposal rejected by futarchy markets - **2026-00-00** — Multiple crypto research outlets (KuCoin, TechFlow, Bitget, Followin) identified MetaDAO as quality differentiator in 2026 trends analysis, citing 100% above-ICO survival rate versus Pump.fun's <0.5% as evidence of futarchy curation effectiveness ## Key Decisions | Date | Proposal | Proposer | Category | Outcome | |------|----------|----------|----------|---------| -| 2024-03-03 | [[metadao-burn-993-percent-meta]] | doctor.sol & rar3 | Treasury | Passed | -| 2024-03-13 | [[metadao-develop-faas]] | 0xNallok | Strategy | Passed | -| 2024-03-28 | [[metadao-migrate-autocrat-v02]] | HenryE & Proph3t | Mechanism | Passed | -| 2024-05-27 | [[metadao-compensation-proph3t-nallok]] | Proph3t & Nallok | Hiring | Passed | -| 2024-06-26 | [[metadao-fundraise-2]] | Proph3t | Fundraise | Passed | -| 2024-11-21 | [[metadao-create-futardio]] | unknown | Strategy | Failed | -| 2025-01-28 | [[metadao-token-split-elastic-supply]] | @aradtski | Mechanism | Failed | -| 2025-02-10 | [[metadao-hire-robin-hanson]] | Proph3t | Hiring | Passed | -| 2025-02-26 | [[metadao-release-launchpad]] | Proph3t & Kollan | Strategy | Passed | -| 2025-08-07 | [[metadao-migrate-meta-token]] | Proph3t & Kollan | Mechanism | Passed | +| 2024-03-03 | metadao-burn-993-percent-meta | doctor.sol & rar3 | Treasury | Passed | +| 2024-03-13 | metadao-develop-faas | 0xNallok | Strategy | Passed | +| 2024-03-28 | metadao-migrate-autocrat-v02 | HenryE & Proph3t | Mechanism | Passed | +| 2024-05-27 | metadao-compensation-proph3t-nallok | Proph3t & Nallok | Hiring | Passed | +| 2024-06-26 | metadao-fundraise-2 | Proph3t | Fundraise | Passed | +| 2024-11-21 | metadao-create-futardio | unknown | Strategy | Failed | +| 2025-01-28 | metadao-token-split-elastic-supply | @aradtski | Mechanism | Failed | +| 2025-02-10 | metadao-hire-robin-hanson | Proph3t | Hiring | Passed | +| 2025-02-26 | metadao-release-launchpad | Proph3t & Kollan | Strategy | Passed | +| 2025-08-07 | metadao-migrate-meta-token | Proph3t & Kollan | Mechanism | Passed | ## Competitive Position - **First mover** in futarchy-governed organizations at scale @@ -93,15 +93,15 @@ MetaDAO is the platform bet on futarchy as a governance mechanism. If decision m - [[MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window]] — mechanism description - [[MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions]] — known limitation - [[futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility]] — active design challenge -- [[DAO governance degenerates into political capture because proposal processes select for coalition-building skill over operational competence and the resulting bureaucracy creates structural speed disadvantages against focused competitors]] — the problem MetaDAO solves +- DAO governance degenerates into political capture because proposal processes select for coalition-building skill over operational competence and the resulting bureaucracy creates structural speed disadvantages against focused competitors — the problem MetaDAO solves --- Relevant Entities: -- [[omnipair]] — leverage infrastructure for ecosystem -- [[proph3t]] — founder -- [[solomon]] — ecosystem launch -- [[futardio]] — launch platform +- omnipair — leverage infrastructure for ecosystem +- proph3t — founder +- solomon — ecosystem launch +- futardio — launch platform Topics: - [[internet finance and decision markets]] diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-crypto-trends-lessons-2026-ownership-coins.md b/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-crypto-trends-lessons-2026-ownership-coins.md index 98117901..4b413dff 100644 --- a/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-crypto-trends-lessons-2026-ownership-coins.md +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-00-00-crypto-trends-lessons-2026-ownership-coins.md @@ -38,12 +38,12 @@ Multiple crypto research outlets identified ownership coins as a major investmen **Why this matters:** Ownership coins entering the mainstream crypto narrative is a validation signal. When research outlets and institutional players (Galaxy Digital) frame ownership coins as a distinct category, it accelerates adoption and capital flow. **What surprised me:** The Pump.fun comparison is stark — <0.5% survival rate vs 100% above-ICO for MetaDAO. This is the strongest comparative evidence for futarchy curation. **What I expected but didn't find:** Detailed institutional analysis of ownership coin legal frameworks. The narrative is primarily investment thesis, not regulatory analysis. -**KB connections:** [[Community ownership accelerates growth through aligned evangelism not passive holding]] — narrative adoption is itself a form of community ownership acceleration. +**KB connections:** Community ownership accelerates growth through aligned evangelism not passive holding — narrative adoption is itself a form of community ownership acceleration. **Extraction hints:** Pump.fun vs MetaDAO survival rate comparison. Ownership coin narrative adoption as signal. **Context:** Multiple outlets published similar "2026 trends" pieces citing MetaDAO. Galaxy Digital's framing carries institutional weight. ## Curator Notes (structured handoff for extractor) -PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[Community ownership accelerates growth through aligned evangelism not passive holding]] +PRIMARY CONNECTION: Community ownership accelerates growth through aligned evangelism not passive holding WHY ARCHIVED: Ownership coin narrative going mainstream is a meaningful signal. Pump.fun comparison (<0.5% vs 100% survival) is the strongest comparative data for futarchy curation quality. EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on (1) Pump.fun vs MetaDAO survival rates as futarchy curation evidence, (2) institutional narrative adoption (Galaxy Digital) as validation signal.