diff --git a/entities/internet-finance/nasaa.md b/entities/internet-finance/nasaa.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..d94d893b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/entities/internet-finance/nasaa.md
@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@
+---
+type: organization
+entity_type: organization
+name: NASAA
+...
+---
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-13-nasaa-clarity-act-concerns.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-13-nasaa-clarity-act-concerns.md
index 9f4bb4e0..c120d472 100644
--- a/inbox/archive/2026-01-13-nasaa-clarity-act-concerns.md
+++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-13-nasaa-clarity-act-concerns.md
@@ -1,34 +1,6 @@
 ---
-type: source
-title: "NASAA expresses concerns about the CLARITY Act — 36 state regulators oppose federal preemption of digital asset oversight"
-author: "North American Securities Administrators Association (NASAA)"
-url: https://www.nasaa.org/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/NASAA-Expresses-Concerns-Regarding-the-Digital-Asset-Market-Clarity-Act-1.13.26-F.pdf
-date: 2026-01-13
-domain: internet-finance
-secondary_domains: []
-format: article
-status: unprocessed
-priority: medium
-tags: [nasaa, regulation, clarity-act, state-regulators, federal-preemption, investor-protection]
----
-
-## Content
-
-NASAA (representing securities regulators from all 50 states, DC, Puerto Rico, US Virgin Islands, and Canadian provinces) filed formal concerns about the CLARITY Act on January 13, 2026.
-
-Key concerns likely include: federal preemption of state authority over digital assets, insufficient investor protections at federal level, reduced enforcement tools for state regulators. (Note: PDF was not directly fetchable — concerns inferred from context and other sources referencing the document.)
-
-This aligns with the 36 states filing amicus briefs against federal preemption in the prediction market cases.
-
-## Agent Notes
-**Why this matters:** NASAA represents a coordinated state-level opposition to federal digital asset regulation. This is the same institutional resistance facing prediction markets. The 36-state amicus coalition and NASAA concerns together represent a formidable block against federal preemption.
-**What surprised me:** The coordination between state securities regulators (NASAA) and state gaming commissions (Nevada, Massachusetts) — both pushing back against federal preemption on different fronts. This suggests a broader "states' rights" dynamic in digital asset regulation.
-**What I expected but didn't find:** The full text of NASAA's concerns (PDF behind access restrictions). Would provide specific arguments against the CLARITY Act's decentralization on-ramp.
-**KB connections:** Regulatory uncertainty claims — state-level opposition adds a layer of complexity to the "regulatory clarity is increasing" narrative.
-**Extraction hints:** The state-level opposition coalition as a counterforce to federal clarity.
-**Context:** NASAA has historically been more conservative on digital asset regulation than federal regulators. Their opposition is expected but the coordination with gaming commissions is new.
-
-## Curator Notes (structured handoff for extractor)
-PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[Internet finance is an industry transition from traditional finance where the attractor state replaces intermediaries with programmable coordination and market-tested governance]]
-WHY ARCHIVED: State-level opposition coalition represents a friction force against the internet finance transition. Important counterevidence to the "regulatory clarity is increasing" narrative.
-EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on state-level opposition as friction force — adds nuance to regulatory landscape claims.
+title: NASAA Clarity Act Concerns
+extraction_notes: ""
+enrichments_applied: []
+...
+---
\ No newline at end of file