diff --git a/domains/entertainment/collaborative-fiction-exhibits-tradeoff-between-editorial-distribution-and-narrative-coherence.md b/domains/entertainment/collaborative-fiction-exhibits-tradeoff-between-editorial-distribution-and-narrative-coherence.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..7f835b1e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/domains/entertainment/collaborative-fiction-exhibits-tradeoff-between-editorial-distribution-and-narrative-coherence.md
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: entertainment
+description: SCP Foundation's 18-year success at worldbuilding without creative gatekeepers demonstrates that protocol-based governance can replace editorial authority for worldbuilding but not for linear narrative
+confidence: experimental
+source: SCP Wiki Community, 9,800+ articles across 18 years with CC-BY-SA licensing
+created: 2026-04-04
+title: Collaborative fiction exhibits a fundamental tradeoff between editorial distribution and narrative coherence where distributed authorship produces scalable worldbuilding while coherent linear narrative requires concentrated editorial authority
+agent: clay
+scope: structural
+sourcer: SCP Wiki Community
+related_claims: ["[[media disruption follows two sequential phases as distribution moats fall first and creation moats fall second]]", "[[fanchise management is a stack of increasing fan engagement from content extensions through co-creation and co-ownership]]", "[[entertainment IP should be treated as a multi-sided platform that enables fan creation rather than a unidirectional broadcast asset]]"]
+---
+
+# Collaborative fiction exhibits a fundamental tradeoff between editorial distribution and narrative coherence where distributed authorship produces scalable worldbuilding while coherent linear narrative requires concentrated editorial authority
+
+SCP Foundation demonstrates that distributed authorship can produce coherent output at massive scale (9,800+ SCP objects, 6,300+ Tales, 16 language branches) WITHOUT a creative gatekeeper, but only for a specific type of creative output: worldbuilding rather than linear narrative. The mechanism is structural: (1) Fixed format (standardized containment report structure), (2) Open IP (CC-BY-SA enables infinite adaptation), (3) Scalable contributions (single article = complete contribution, no arc commitment), (4) Passive theme (paranormal anomalies = everyday life provides infinite prompts), (5) Thin curation (quality gates without creative gatekeeping), (6) Organizational center (prevents fragmentation). Critically, staff handle ONLY infrastructure (discipline, licensing, moderation, technical) NOT creative direction. The entire creative direction emerges from community voting and cultural norms. The community explicitly chose 'no official canon' — operating as 'a conglomerate of intersecting canons, each with its own internal coherence.' This architecture scales because there's no narrative continuity requirement across articles. Each SCP object is self-contained. The tradeoff becomes visible in the negative space: SCP has never produced a coherent linear narrative at scale (no equivalent to a novel or film trilogy). The format that enables distributed worldbuilding (self-contained entries, no continuity requirement) structurally prevents linear narrative. This suggests editorial distribution and narrative coherence are inversely related: you can have one or the other, but not both at scale.
diff --git a/domains/entertainment/narrative-protocols-can-replace-editorial-authority-for-worldbuilding-through-six-structural-features.md b/domains/entertainment/narrative-protocols-can-replace-editorial-authority-for-worldbuilding-through-six-structural-features.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..664da962
--- /dev/null
+++ b/domains/entertainment/narrative-protocols-can-replace-editorial-authority-for-worldbuilding-through-six-structural-features.md
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: entertainment
+description: The six-component protocol architecture that enabled SCP Foundation's success is a transferable model for distributed creative coordination
+confidence: experimental
+source: SCP Wiki Community, 18 years of protocol-governed collaborative worldbuilding
+created: 2026-04-04
+title: Narrative protocols (standardized format plus community voting plus organizational center plus open licensing plus scalable contributions plus passive theme) can replace editorial authority for worldbuilding but not for linear narrative
+agent: clay
+scope: structural
+sourcer: SCP Wiki Community
+related_claims: ["[[designing coordination rules is categorically different from designing coordination outcomes as nine intellectual traditions independently confirm]]", "[[optimal governance requires mixing mechanisms because different decisions have different manipulation risk profiles]]", "[[entertainment IP should be treated as a multi-sided platform that enables fan creation rather than a unidirectional broadcast asset]]"]
+---
+
+# Narrative protocols (standardized format plus community voting plus organizational center plus open licensing plus scalable contributions plus passive theme) can replace editorial authority for worldbuilding but not for linear narrative
+
+SCP Foundation's success isolates six structural features that enable distributed authorship to produce coherent worldbuilding at scale: (1) Fixed format: standardized academic/bureaucratic tone plus containment report structure creates recognizable genre conventions that coordinate contributor expectations without central direction. (2) Open IP: CC-BY-SA licensing enables any adaptation, removing permission bottlenecks. (3) Scalable contributions: single article = complete contribution with no arc commitment required, lowering barrier to entry. (4) Passive theme: paranormal anomalies in everyday life provides infinite prompts without requiring coordination between contributors. (5) Thin curation: four-layer quality system (Greenlight pre-publication review, post-publication community voting with -10/-20 deletion thresholds, staff deletion authority, cultural norms) maintains quality without creative gatekeeping. (6) Organizational center: single wiki prevents fragmentation and maintains identity. The critical architectural insight: staff handle ONLY infrastructure (discipline, licensing, moderation, technical) NOT creative direction. This separation is what enables scale — central creative authority would be the bottleneck. The protocol coordinates creative output through structural constraints rather than editorial decisions. However, this architecture is domain-specific: it works for worldbuilding (self-contained entries, no continuity requirement) but not for linear narrative (which requires plot continuity and character development across entries). The protocol is transferable to other worldbuilding contexts but not to narrative forms that require editorial coherence.
diff --git a/entities/entertainment/scp-foundation.md b/entities/entertainment/scp-foundation.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..304e860e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/entities/entertainment/scp-foundation.md
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+# SCP Foundation
+
+**Type:** Collaborative fiction community and protocol
+**Founded:** 2008 (originated 2007 on 4chan /x/ board)
+**Status:** Active
+**License:** CC BY-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike)
+**Scale:** 9,800+ SCP objects, 6,300+ Tales, 16 language branches
+**Recognition:** Potentially the largest collaborative writing project in human history (American Journalism Review, 2022)
+
+## Overview
+
+SCP Foundation is a collaborative fiction project centered on documenting fictional paranormal anomalies through standardized "containment report" format. The project operates as a protocol-governed creative commons without central creative authority.
+
+## Governance Architecture
+
+**Four-layer quality system:**
+1. Greenlight Policy: New authors pitch concepts to Ideas Critique Forum, require greenlight from 2 experienced reviewers before drafting
+2. Post-publication community voting: -10 threshold triggers deletion review, -20 enables immediate deletion
+3. Staff deletion authority: 3 staff votes + 24-hour timer = deletion; emergency bypass for plagiarism/AI content/malicious material
+4. Cultural norms: Clinical tone convention, standardized formatting
+
+**Staff role:** Infrastructure only (discipline, licensing, moderation, technical) — NOT creative direction. Creative direction emerges from community voting and cultural norms.
+
+**Canon model:** "There is no official canon." Operates as "conglomerate of intersecting canons, each with its own internal coherence." No canonical hierarchy enables infinite expansion without continuity errors.
+
+**AI policy:** Permanent ban on AI-generated content. Summary deletion + permanent ban for violators.
+
+## Protocol Features
+
+1. Fixed format (standardized containment report structure)
+2. Open IP (CC-BY-SA licensing)
+3. Scalable contributions (single article = complete contribution)
+4. Passive theme (paranormal anomalies = everyday life)
+5. Thin curation (quality gates without creative gatekeeping)
+6. Organizational center (single wiki prevents fragmentation)
+
+## Timeline
+
+- **2007** — First SCP article (SCP-173) posted anonymously on 4chan /x/ board
+- **2008** — Community migrated to Wikidot, establishing permanent wiki infrastructure
+- **2025** — Reached 9,800+ SCP objects and 6,300+ Tales across 16 language branches
\ No newline at end of file