From a2da2d924e1117c94a9f664fd87cdfa1cc9b1f37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: m3taversal Date: Mon, 9 Mar 2026 12:13:27 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Auto: inbox/archive/2026-03-09-rocketresearchx-x-archive.md | 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) --- .../2026-03-09-rocketresearchx-x-archive.md | 38 +++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+) create mode 100644 inbox/archive/2026-03-09-rocketresearchx-x-archive.md diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-03-09-rocketresearchx-x-archive.md b/inbox/archive/2026-03-09-rocketresearchx-x-archive.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6042441 --- /dev/null +++ b/inbox/archive/2026-03-09-rocketresearchx-x-archive.md @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +--- +type: source +title: "@rocketresearchx X archive — 100 most recent tweets" +author: "Team Rocket Research (@rocketresearchx)" +url: https://x.com/rocketresearchx +date: 2026-03-09 +domain: internet-finance +format: tweet +status: unprocessed +tags: [media, research, trading, market-analysis, solana] +linked_set: metadao-x-landscape-2026-03 +curator_notes: | + OG crypto research outfit (Bitcoin since 2011). 94% substantive ratio but content is + primarily trading/technical analysis and market commentary rather than mechanism design. + Only 2 MetaDAO references. Market cap analysis ($15M vs $100M valuations), technical + indicators (EMA 8 rejection), geopolitical risk assessment. Useful for broader crypto + market context but not a source of mechanism design claims. +extraction_hints: + - "Market structure commentary — broader context for crypto capital formation" + - "Null-result likely for MetaDAO-specific claims" +priority: low +--- + +# @rocketresearchx X Archive (March 2026) + +## Substantive Tweets + +### Market Analysis +- Technical analysis: EMA 8 rejection on weekly, market cap comparisons +- Geopolitical risk assessment (Iran events, Bloomberg coverage) +- 94% substantive but all trading-focused + +### MetaDAO Connection +- 2 references — peripheral to ecosystem +- Research perspective rather than builder perspective + +## Noise Filtered Out +- 6% noise — highly substantive but wrong domain for claim extraction