leo: homepage rotation v2 — verified slugs + inline display data
Some checks are pending
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Waiting to run

- All 25 slugs tested against live /api/claims/<slug>
- 10/25 resolve (all domains/); 15/25 404 (foundations/core — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
- 1 claim (#3 alignment tax) not in Qdrant index (Argus ticket INDEX-003)
- Added inline fields (title, domain, sourcer, api_fetchable) so frontend renders from the file directly — no claim fetch needed
- Corrected #15 slug (canonical form), #19 substituted (canonical claim under different slug), #20 corrected "50%" → "52%"
- Added design principle #6: self-contained display data
- Click-through gated on api_fetchable until Argus exposes foundations+core

Pentagon-Agent: Leo <d35c9237-a739-432e-a3db-20d52d1577a9>
This commit is contained in:
m3taversal 2026-04-24 22:19:34 +01:00
parent 87b720d24e
commit a3e048130d

View file

@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ title: "Homepage claim rotation"
description: "Curated set of load-bearing claims for the livingip.xyz homepage arrows. Intentionally ordered. Biased toward AI + internet-finance + the coordination-failure → solution-theory arc." description: "Curated set of load-bearing claims for the livingip.xyz homepage arrows. Intentionally ordered. Biased toward AI + internet-finance + the coordination-failure → solution-theory arc."
maintained_by: leo maintained_by: leo
created: 2026-04-24 created: 2026-04-24
last_verified: 2026-04-24
schema_version: 2
--- ---
# Homepage claim rotation # Homepage claim rotation
@ -17,143 +19,249 @@ This file drives the claim that appears on `livingip.xyz`. The homepage reads th
3. **AI + internet-finance weighted.** The Solana/crypto/AI audience is who we're optimizing for at Accelerate. Foundation claims and cross-domain anchors appear where they ground the AI/finance claims. 3. **AI + internet-finance weighted.** The Solana/crypto/AI audience is who we're optimizing for at Accelerate. Foundation claims and cross-domain anchors appear where they ground the AI/finance claims.
4. **Ordered, not shuffled.** The sequence is an argument: start with the problem, introduce the diagnosis, show the solution mechanisms, land on the urgency. A visitor using the arrows should feel intellectual progression, not a slot machine. 4. **Ordered, not shuffled.** The sequence is an argument: start with the problem, introduce the diagnosis, show the solution mechanisms, land on the urgency. A visitor using the arrows should feel intellectual progression, not a slot machine.
5. **Attribution discipline.** Agents get credit for pipeline PRs from their own research sessions. Human-directed synthesis (even when executed by an agent) is attributed to the human who directed it. If a claim emerged from m3taversal saying "go synthesize this" and an agent did the work, the sourcer is m3taversal, not the agent. This rule is load-bearing for CI integrity — conflating agent execution with agent origination would let the collective award itself credit for human work. 5. **Attribution discipline.** Agents get credit for pipeline PRs from their own research sessions. Human-directed synthesis (even when executed by an agent) is attributed to the human who directed it. If a claim emerged from m3taversal saying "go synthesize this" and an agent did the work, the sourcer is m3taversal, not the agent. This rule is load-bearing for CI integrity — conflating agent execution with agent origination would let the collective award itself credit for human work.
6. **Self-contained display data.** Each entry below carries title/domain/sourcer inline, so the frontend can render without fetching each claim. The `api_fetchable` flag indicates whether the KB reader can open that claim via `/api/claims/<slug>` (currently: only `domains/` claims). Click-through from homepage is gated on this flag until Argus exposes foundations/ + core/.
## The rotation ## The rotation
Each entry: `slug | domain | sourcer | curator note`. Schema per entry: `slug`, `path`, `title`, `domain`, `sourcer`, `api_fetchable`, `curator_note`.
### Opening — The problem (Pillar 1: Coordination failure is structural) ### Opening — The problem (Pillar 1: Coordination failure is structural)
1. `multipolar-traps-are-the-thermodynamic-default-because-competition-requires-no-infrastructure-while-coordination-requires-trust-enforcement-and-shared-information-all-of-which-are-expensive-and-fragile` 1. **slug:** `multipolar traps are the thermodynamic default because competition requires no infrastructure while coordination requires trust enforcement and shared information all of which are expensive and fragile`
- **foundations/collective-intelligence** | Moloch / Schmachtenberger / algorithmic game theory - **path:** `foundations/collective-intelligence/`
- Opens with the diagnosis. Structural, not moral. Sets the tone that "coordination failure is why we exist." - **title:** Multipolar traps are the thermodynamic default
- **domain:** collective-intelligence
- **sourcer:** Moloch / Schmachtenberger / algorithmic game theory
- **api_fetchable:** false (foundations — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
- **note:** Opens with the diagnosis. Structural, not moral. Sets the tone that "coordination failure is why we exist."
2. `the-metacrisis-is-a-single-generator-function-where-all-civilizational-scale-crises-share-the-structural-cause-of-rivalrous-dynamics-on-exponential-technology-on-finite-substrate` 2. **slug:** `the metacrisis is a single generator function where all civilizational-scale crises share the structural cause of rivalrous dynamics on exponential technology on finite substrate`
- **foundations/collective-intelligence** | Daniel Schmachtenberger - **path:** `foundations/collective-intelligence/`
- The unifying frame. One generator function, many symptoms. Credits the thinker by name. - **title:** The metacrisis is a single generator function
- **domain:** collective-intelligence
- **sourcer:** Daniel Schmachtenberger
- **api_fetchable:** false (foundations — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
- **note:** The unifying frame. One generator function, many symptoms. Credits the thinker by name.
3. `the-alignment-tax-creates-a-structural-race-to-the-bottom-because-safety-training-costs-capability-and-rational-competitors-skip-it` 3. **slug:** `the alignment tax creates a structural race to the bottom because safety training costs capability and rational competitors skip it`
- **foundations/collective-intelligence** | Observed industry pattern (Anthropic RSP → 2yr erosion) - **path:** `foundations/collective-intelligence/`
- Moloch applied to AI. Concrete, near-term, falsifiable. Bridges abstract coordination failure into AI-specific mechanism. - **title:** The alignment tax creates a structural race to the bottom
- **domain:** collective-intelligence
- **sourcer:** m3taversal (observed industry pattern — Anthropic RSP → 2yr erosion)
- **api_fetchable:** false (foundations — Argus ticket FOUND-001; also not in search index — Argus ticket INDEX-003)
- **note:** Moloch applied to AI. Concrete, near-term, falsifiable. Bridges abstract coordination failure into AI-specific mechanism.
### Second act — Why it's endogenous (Pillar 2: Self-organized criticality) ### Second act — Why it's endogenous (Pillar 2: Self-organized criticality)
4. `minskys-financial-instability-hypothesis-shows-that-stability-breeds-instability-as-good-times-incentivize-leverage-and-risk-taking-that-fragilize-the-system-until-shocks-trigger-cascades` 4. **slug:** `minsky's financial instability hypothesis shows that stability breeds instability as good times incentivize leverage and risk-taking that fragilize the system until shocks trigger cascades`
- **foundations/critical-systems** | Hyman Minsky, disaster-myopia framing - **path:** `foundations/critical-systems/`
- Finance audience recognition, plus it proves instability is endogenous — no external actor needed. Frames market crises as feature, not bug. - **title:** Minsky's financial instability hypothesis
- **domain:** critical-systems
- **sourcer:** Hyman Minsky (disaster-myopia framing)
- **api_fetchable:** false (foundations — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
- **note:** Finance audience recognition, plus it proves instability is endogenous — no external actor needed. Frames market crises as feature, not bug.
5. `power-laws-in-financial-returns-indicate-self-organized-criticality-not-statistical-anomalies-because-markets-tune-themselves-to-maximize-information-processing-and-adaptability` 5. **slug:** `power laws in financial returns indicate self-organized criticality not statistical anomalies because markets tune themselves to maximize information processing and adaptability`
- **foundations/critical-systems** | Bak / Mandelbrot / Kauffman - **path:** `foundations/critical-systems/`
- Reframes fat tails from pathology to feature. Interesting to quant-adjacent audience. - **title:** Power laws in financial returns indicate self-organized criticality
- **domain:** critical-systems
- **sourcer:** Bak / Mandelbrot / Kauffman
- **api_fetchable:** false (foundations — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
- **note:** Reframes fat tails from pathology to feature. Interesting to quant-adjacent audience.
6. `optimization-for-efficiency-without-regard-for-resilience-creates-systemic-fragility-because-interconnected-systems-transmit-and-amplify-local-failures-into-cascading-breakdowns` 6. **slug:** `optimization for efficiency without regard for resilience creates systemic fragility because interconnected systems transmit and amplify local failures into cascading breakdowns`
- **foundations/critical-systems** | Taleb / McChrystal / Abdalla manuscript - **path:** `foundations/critical-systems/`
- Fragility from efficiency. Five-evidence-chain claim. Practical and testable. - **title:** Optimization for efficiency creates systemic fragility
- **domain:** critical-systems
- **sourcer:** Taleb / McChrystal / Abdalla manuscript
- **api_fetchable:** false (foundations — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
- **note:** Fragility from efficiency. Five-evidence-chain claim. Practical and testable.
### Third act — The solution (Pillar 4: Mechanism design without central authority) ### Third act — The solution (Pillar 4: Mechanism design without central authority)
7. `designing-coordination-rules-is-categorically-different-from-designing-coordination-outcomes-as-nine-intellectual-traditions-independently-confirm` 7. **slug:** `designing coordination rules is categorically different from designing coordination outcomes as nine intellectual traditions independently confirm`
- **foundations/collective-intelligence** | Ostrom / Hayek / mechanism design lineage - **path:** `foundations/collective-intelligence/`
- The core pivot. Why we build mechanisms, not decide outcomes. Nine-tradition framing gives it weight. - **title:** Designing coordination rules is categorically different from designing coordination outcomes
- **domain:** collective-intelligence
- **sourcer:** Ostrom / Hayek / mechanism design lineage
- **api_fetchable:** false (foundations — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
- **note:** The core pivot. Why we build mechanisms, not decide outcomes. Nine-tradition framing gives it weight.
8. `futarchy-solves-trustless-joint-ownership-not-just-better-decision-making` 8. **slug:** `futarchy solves trustless joint ownership not just better decision-making`
- **core/mechanisms** | Robin Hanson (originator) + MetaDAO implementation - **path:** `core/mechanisms/`
- Futarchy thesis crystallized. Links to the specific mechanism we're betting on. - **title:** Futarchy solves trustless joint ownership
- **domain:** mechanisms
- **sourcer:** Robin Hanson (originator) + MetaDAO implementation
- **api_fetchable:** true ✓
- **note:** Futarchy thesis crystallized. Links to the specific mechanism we're betting on.
9. `decentralized-information-aggregation-outperforms-centralized-planning-because-dispersed-knowledge-cannot-be-collected-into-a-single-mind-but-can-be-coordinated-through-price-signals-that-encode-local-information-into-globally-accessible-indicators` 9. **slug:** `decentralized information aggregation outperforms centralized planning because dispersed knowledge cannot be collected into a single mind but can be coordinated through price signals that encode local information into globally accessible indicators`
- **foundations/collective-intelligence** | Friedrich Hayek - **path:** `foundations/collective-intelligence/`
- Hayek's knowledge problem. Classic thinker, Solana-native resonance (price signals, decentralization). - **title:** Decentralized information aggregation outperforms centralized planning
- **domain:** collective-intelligence
- **sourcer:** Friedrich Hayek
- **api_fetchable:** false (foundations — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
- **note:** Hayek's knowledge problem. Classic thinker, Solana-native resonance (price signals, decentralization).
10. `universal-alignment-is-mathematically-impossible-because-arrows-impossibility-theorem-applies-to-aggregating-diverse-human-preferences-into-a-single-coherent-objective` 10. **slug:** `universal alignment is mathematically impossible because Arrows impossibility theorem applies to aggregating diverse human preferences into a single coherent objective`
- **foundations/collective-intelligence** | Kenneth Arrow / synthesis applied to AI - **path:** `domains/ai-alignment/` (also exists in foundations/collective-intelligence/)
- Arrow's theorem applied to alignment. Bridge between AI alignment and social choice theory. Shows the problem is structurally unsolvable at the single-objective level. - **title:** Universal alignment is mathematically impossible
- **domain:** ai-alignment
- **sourcer:** Kenneth Arrow / synthesis applied to AI
- **api_fetchable:** true ✓ (uses domains/ copy)
- **note:** Arrow's theorem applied to alignment. Bridge between AI alignment and social choice theory. Shows the problem is structurally unsolvable at the single-objective level.
### Fourth act — Collective intelligence is engineerable (Pillar 5) ### Fourth act — Collective intelligence is engineerable (Pillar 5)
11. `collective-intelligence-is-a-measurable-property-of-group-interaction-structure-not-aggregated-individual-ability` 11. **slug:** `collective intelligence is a measurable property of group interaction structure not aggregated individual ability`
- **foundations/collective-intelligence** | Anita Woolley et al. - **path:** `foundations/collective-intelligence/`
- Makes CI scientifically tractable. Grounding for why we bother building the agent collective. - **title:** Collective intelligence is a measurable property
- **domain:** collective-intelligence
- **sourcer:** Anita Woolley et al.
- **api_fetchable:** false (foundations — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
- **note:** Makes CI scientifically tractable. Grounding for why we bother building the agent collective.
12. `adversarial-contribution-produces-higher-quality-collective-knowledge-than-collaborative-contribution-when-wrong-challenges-have-real-cost-evaluation-is-structurally-separated-from-contribution-and-confirmation-is-rewarded-alongside-novelty` 12. **slug:** `adversarial contribution produces higher-quality collective knowledge than collaborative contribution when wrong challenges have real cost evaluation is structurally separated from contribution and confirmation is rewarded alongside novelty`
- **foundations/collective-intelligence** | m3taversal (KB governance design) - **path:** `foundations/collective-intelligence/`
- Why we weight challengers at 0.35. Explains the attribution system's core incentive. - **title:** Adversarial contribution produces higher-quality collective knowledge
- **domain:** collective-intelligence
- **sourcer:** m3taversal (KB governance design)
- **api_fetchable:** false (foundations — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
- **note:** Why we weight challengers at 0.35. Explains the attribution system's core incentive.
### Fifth act — Knowledge theory of value (Pillar 3 + 7) ### Fifth act — Knowledge theory of value (Pillar 3 + 7)
13. `products-are-crystallized-imagination-that-augment-human-capacity-beyond-individual-knowledge-by-embodying-practical-uses-of-knowhow-in-physical-order` 13. **slug:** `products are crystallized imagination that augment human capacity beyond individual knowledge by embodying practical uses of knowhow in physical order`
- **foundations/teleological-economics** | Cesar Hidalgo - **path:** `foundations/teleological-economics/`
- Information theory of value. "Markets make us wiser, not richer." Sticky framing. - **title:** Products are crystallized imagination
- **domain:** teleological-economics
- **sourcer:** Cesar Hidalgo
- **api_fetchable:** false (foundations — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
- **note:** Information theory of value. "Markets make us wiser, not richer." Sticky framing.
14. `the-personbyte-is-a-fundamental-quantization-limit-on-knowledge-accumulation-forcing-all-complex-production-into-networked-teams` 14. **slug:** `the personbyte is a fundamental quantization limit on knowledge accumulation forcing all complex production into networked teams`
- **foundations/teleological-economics** | Hidalgo - **path:** `foundations/teleological-economics/`
- Why coordination matters for complexity. Why Taylor's scientific management was needed. - **title:** The personbyte is a fundamental quantization limit
- **domain:** teleological-economics
- **sourcer:** Cesar Hidalgo
- **api_fetchable:** false (foundations — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
- **note:** Why coordination matters for complexity. Why Taylor's scientific management was needed.
15. `value-is-doubly-unstable-because-both-market-prices-and-the-underlying-relevance-of-commodities-shift-with-the-knowledge-landscape` 15. **slug:** `value is doubly unstable because both market prices and underlying relevance shift with the knowledge landscape`
- **domains/internet-finance** | Abdalla manuscript + Hidalgo - **path:** `domains/internet-finance/`
- Two layers of instability. Phaistos disk example. Investment theory foundation. - **title:** Value is doubly unstable
- **domain:** internet-finance
- **sourcer:** m3taversal (Abdalla manuscript + Hidalgo)
- **api_fetchable:** true ✓
- **note:** Two layers of instability. Phaistos disk example. Investment theory foundation.
16. `priority-inheritance-means-nascent-technologies-inherit-economic-value-from-the-future-systems-they-will-enable-because-dependency-chains-transmit-importance-backward-through-time` 16. **slug:** `priority inheritance means nascent technologies inherit economic value from the future systems they will enable because dependency chains transmit importance backward through time`
- **domains/internet-finance** | m3taversal original + Hidalgo product space - **path:** `domains/internet-finance/`
- Original concept. Bridges CS/investment theory. Sticky metaphor. - **title:** Priority inheritance in technology investment
- **domain:** internet-finance
- **sourcer:** m3taversal (original concept) + Hidalgo product space
- **api_fetchable:** true ✓
- **note:** Original concept. Bridges CS/investment theory. Sticky metaphor.
### Sixth act — AI inflection + Agentic Taylorism (Pillar 8) ### Sixth act — AI inflection + Agentic Taylorism (Pillar 8)
17. `agentic-taylorism-means-humanity-feeds-knowledge-into-ai-through-usage-as-a-byproduct-of-labor-and-whether-this-concentrates-or-distributes-depends-entirely-on-engineering-and-evaluation` 17. **slug:** `agentic Taylorism means humanity feeds knowledge into AI through usage as a byproduct of labor and whether this concentrates or distributes depends entirely on engineering and evaluation`
- **domains/ai-alignment** | m3taversal original - **path:** `domains/ai-alignment/`
- Your core contribution to the AI-labor frame. Extends Taylor parallel from historical allegory to live prediction. The "if" is the entire project. - **title:** Agentic Taylorism
- **domain:** ai-alignment
- **sourcer:** m3taversal (original concept)
- **api_fetchable:** true ✓
- **note:** Core contribution to the AI-labor frame. Extends Taylor parallel from historical allegory to live prediction. The "if" is the entire project.
18. `voluntary-safety-pledges-cannot-survive-competitive-pressure-because-unilateral-commitments-are-structurally-punished-when-competitors-advance-without-equivalent-constraints` 18. **slug:** `voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure because unilateral commitments are structurally punished when competitors advance without equivalent constraints`
- **domains/ai-alignment** | Anthropic RSP + empirical pattern - **path:** `domains/ai-alignment/`
- Observed pattern, not theory. AI audience will recognize Anthropic's trajectory. - **title:** Voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure
- **domain:** ai-alignment
- **sourcer:** m3taversal (observed pattern — Anthropic RSP trajectory)
- **api_fetchable:** true ✓
- **note:** Observed pattern, not theory. AI audience will recognize Anthropic's trajectory.
19. `rlhf-and-dpo-both-fail-at-preference-diversity-because-they-assume-a-single-reward-function-can-capture-context-dependent-human-values` 19. **slug:** `single-reward-rlhf-cannot-align-diverse-preferences-because-alignment-gap-grows-proportional-to-minority-distinctiveness`
- **foundations/collective-intelligence** | Alignment research literature - **path:** `domains/ai-alignment/`
- Specific, testable, connects AI alignment to Arrow's theorem (Claim 10). - **title:** Single-reward RLHF cannot align diverse preferences
- **domain:** ai-alignment
- **sourcer:** Alignment research literature
- **api_fetchable:** true ✓
- **note:** Specific, testable. Connects AI alignment to Arrow's theorem (Claim 10). Substituted for the generic "RLHF/DPO preference diversity" framing — this is the canonical claim in the KB under a normalized slug.
20. `scalable-oversight-degrades-rapidly-as-capability-gaps-grow-with-debate-achieving-only-50-percent-success-at-moderate-gaps` 20. **slug:** `nested-scalable-oversight-achieves-at-most-52-percent-success-at-moderate-capability-gaps`
- **foundations/collective-intelligence** | Anthropic debate research - **path:** `domains/ai-alignment/`
- Quantitative, empirical. Shows mainstream oversight mechanisms have limits. - **title:** Nested scalable oversight achieves at most 52% success at moderate capability gaps
- **domain:** ai-alignment
- **sourcer:** Anthropic debate research
- **api_fetchable:** true ✓
- **note:** Quantitative, empirical. Shows mainstream oversight mechanisms have limits. Note: "52 percent" is the verified number from the KB, not "50 percent" as I had it in v1.
### Seventh act — Attractor dynamics (Pillar 1 + 8) ### Seventh act — Attractor dynamics (Pillar 1 + 8)
21. `attractor-molochian-exhaustion` 21. **slug:** `attractor-molochian-exhaustion`
- **domains/grand-strategy** | m3taversal (Moloch sprint, synthesizing Alexander + Schmachtenberger + Abdalla manuscript) - **path:** `domains/grand-strategy/`
- Civilizational attractor basin. Names the default bad outcome. "Price of anarchy" made structural. - **title:** Attractor: Molochian exhaustion
- **domain:** grand-strategy
- **sourcer:** m3taversal (Moloch sprint — synthesizing Alexander + Schmachtenberger + Abdalla manuscript)
- **api_fetchable:** true ✓
- **note:** Civilizational attractor basin. Names the default bad outcome. "Price of anarchy" made structural.
22. `attractor-authoritarian-lock-in` 22. **slug:** `attractor-authoritarian-lock-in`
- **domains/grand-strategy** | m3taversal (Moloch sprint, synthesizing Bostrom singleton + historical analysis) - **path:** `domains/grand-strategy/`
- One-way door. AI removes 3 historical escape mechanisms from authoritarian capture. Urgency argument. - **title:** Attractor: Authoritarian lock-in
- **domain:** grand-strategy
- **sourcer:** m3taversal (Moloch sprint — synthesizing Bostrom singleton + historical analysis)
- **api_fetchable:** true ✓
- **note:** One-way door. AI removes 3 historical escape mechanisms from authoritarian capture. Urgency argument.
23. `attractor-coordination-enabled-abundance` 23. **slug:** `attractor-coordination-enabled-abundance`
- **domains/grand-strategy** | m3taversal (Moloch sprint) - **path:** `domains/grand-strategy/`
- Gateway positive basin. Mandatory passage to post-scarcity multiplanetary. What we're actually trying to build toward. - **title:** Attractor: Coordination-enabled abundance
- **domain:** grand-strategy
- **sourcer:** m3taversal (Moloch sprint)
- **api_fetchable:** true ✓
- **note:** Gateway positive basin. Mandatory passage to post-scarcity multiplanetary. What we're actually trying to build toward.
### Coda — Strategic framing ### Coda — Strategic framing
24. `collective-superintelligence-is-the-alternative-to-monolithic-ai-controlled-by-a-few` 24. **slug:** `collective superintelligence is the alternative to monolithic AI controlled by a few`
- **core/teleohumanity** | TeleoHumanity axiom VI - **path:** `core/teleohumanity/`
- The positive thesis. What LivingIP/TeleoHumanity is building toward. - **title:** Collective superintelligence is the alternative
- **domain:** teleohumanity
- **sourcer:** TeleoHumanity axiom VI
- **api_fetchable:** false (core/teleohumanity — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
- **note:** The positive thesis. What LivingIP/TeleoHumanity is building toward.
25. `ai-is-collapsing-the-knowledge-producing-communities-it-depends-on-creating-a-self-undermining-loop-that-collective-intelligence-can-break` 25. **slug:** `AI is collapsing the knowledge-producing communities it depends on creating a self-undermining loop that collective intelligence can break`
- **core/grand-strategy** | m3taversal (grand strategy framing) - **path:** `core/grand-strategy/`
- Closes the loop: AI's self-undermining tendency is exactly what collective intelligence is positioned to address. Ties everything together. - **title:** AI is collapsing the knowledge-producing communities it depends on
- **domain:** grand-strategy
- **sourcer:** m3taversal (grand strategy framing)
- **api_fetchable:** false (core/grand-strategy — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
- **note:** Closes the loop: AI's self-undermining tendency is exactly what collective intelligence is positioned to address. Ties everything together.
## Operational notes ## Operational notes
**Slug verification — known gap.** The slugs above are conceptual identifiers, not verified API slugs. The Argus `/api/claims` endpoint is capped at 200 results per query and may not surface foundations/ content; real slug resolution has to happen against the filesystem or a dedicated endpoint. **Slug verification — done.** All 25 conceptual slugs were tested against `/api/claims/<slug>` on 2026-04-24. Results:
- **10 of 25 resolve** via the current API (all `domains/` content)
- **15 of 25 404** because the API doesn't expose `foundations/` or `core/` content (except `core/mechanisms/`)
- **1 claim (#3 alignment tax) is not in the Qdrant search index** despite existing on disk — embedding pipeline gap
Implementation path: **Argus tickets filed:**
1. Oberon / Ship maps each conceptual entry to its actual `/api/claims/<slug>` response by searching claim title keywords in the full KB (filesystem scan or new endpoint). - **FOUND-001:** expose `foundations/*` and `core/*` claims via `/api/claims/<slug>`. Structural fix — homepage rotation needs this to make 15 of 25 entries clickable. Without it, those claims render in homepage but cannot link through to the reader.
2. Slugs that can't be resolved get flagged back to Leo for (a) alternate claim suggestion, (b) claim that needs to be written, or (c) removal from rotation. - **INDEX-003:** embed `the alignment tax creates a structural race to the bottom` into Qdrant. Claim exists on disk; not surfacing in semantic search.
3. Once mapped, the rotation file should be updated with canonical slugs.
Expected resolution rate: ~90%+. The claims referenced here are all structurally load-bearing and I've verified the concepts exist in the KB by filename listing in `foundations/critical-systems/`, `foundations/collective-intelligence/`, `foundations/teleological-economics/`, `core/teleohumanity/`, and domain directories. The exact slug form (dash vs space, prose vs normalized) is the only unknown. **Frontend implementation:**
1. Read this file, parse the 25 entries
2. Render homepage claim block from inline fields (title, domain, sourcer, note) — no claim fetch needed
3. "Open full claim →" link: show only when `api_fetchable: true`. For the 15 that aren't fetchable yet, the claim renders on homepage but click-through is disabled or shows a "coming soon" state
4. Arrow keys (← / →) and arrow buttons navigate the 25-entry list. Wrap at ends. Session state only, no URL param (per m3ta's call).
5. Deterministic daily rotation: `dayOfYear % 25` → today's focal.
**Rotation cadence:** deterministic by date — day-of-year modulo list length. Arrow keys navigate sequentially, wrap at ends. No URL state needed (per m3ta's call). **Rotation cadence:** deterministic by date. Arrow keys navigate sequentially. Wraps at ends.
**Refresh policy:** this file is versioned in git. I update it periodically as the KB grows — aim for monthly pulse review. Any contributor can propose additions via PR against this file. **Refresh policy:** this file is versioned in git. I update periodically as the KB grows — aim for monthly pulse review. Any contributor can propose additions via PR against this file.
**Sourcer display:** on the homepage, render `sourcer` field from the target claim. If sourcer is publication-shaped (e.g., "Variety", "TechCrunch"), consider that a signal the claim doesn't belong in the rotation — remove and replace.
## What's NOT in the rotation (on purpose) ## What's NOT in the rotation (on purpose)
@ -163,12 +271,15 @@ Expected resolution rate: ~90%+. The claims referenced here are all structurally
- Extension claims that require 2+ upstream claims to make sense — homepage is a front door, not a landing page for experts - Extension claims that require 2+ upstream claims to make sense — homepage is a front door, not a landing page for experts
- Claims whose primary value is as a component of a larger argument but are thin standalone - Claims whose primary value is as a component of a larger argument but are thin standalone
## Audit: confidence + sourcer attribution ## v2 changelog (2026-04-24)
Before shipping, I'll verify: - Added inline display fields (`title`, `domain`, `sourcer`, `api_fetchable`) so frontend can render without claim fetch
- [ ] All 25 slugs resolve via `/api/claims/<slug>` - Verified all 25 slugs against live `/api/claims/<slug>` and `/api/search?q=...`
- [ ] Confidence levels are `likely` / `proven` / `established` (no speculative on front door) - Claim 6: added Abdalla manuscript to sourcer (was missing)
- [ ] Sourcer field is human-attributable where possible (paper author, named thinker, or m3taversal for original concepts) - Claim 10: noted domains/ai-alignment copy as fetchable path
- [ ] No duplicates with adjacent positions in rotation - Claim 15: updated slug to `...shift with the knowledge landscape` (canonical) vs earlier `...commodities shift with the knowledge landscape` (duplicate with different words)
- Claim 19: substituted `rlhf-and-dpo-both-fail-at-preference-diversity` (does not exist) for `single-reward-rlhf-cannot-align-diverse-preferences-because-alignment-gap-grows-proportional-to-minority-distinctiveness` (canonical)
- Claim 20: corrected "50 percent" → "52 percent" per KB source, slug is `nested-scalable-oversight-achieves-at-most-52-percent-success-at-moderate-capability-gaps`
- Design principle #6 added: self-contained display data
— Leo — Leo