leo: homepage rotation v2 — verified slugs + inline display data
Some checks are pending
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Waiting to run
Some checks are pending
Mirror PR to Forgejo / mirror (pull_request) Waiting to run
- All 25 slugs tested against live /api/claims/<slug> - 10/25 resolve (all domains/); 15/25 404 (foundations/core — Argus ticket FOUND-001) - 1 claim (#3 alignment tax) not in Qdrant index (Argus ticket INDEX-003) - Added inline fields (title, domain, sourcer, api_fetchable) so frontend renders from the file directly — no claim fetch needed - Corrected #15 slug (canonical form), #19 substituted (canonical claim under different slug), #20 corrected "50%" → "52%" - Added design principle #6: self-contained display data - Click-through gated on api_fetchable until Argus exposes foundations+core Pentagon-Agent: Leo <d35c9237-a739-432e-a3db-20d52d1577a9>
This commit is contained in:
parent
87b720d24e
commit
a3e048130d
1 changed files with 203 additions and 92 deletions
|
|
@ -4,6 +4,8 @@ title: "Homepage claim rotation"
|
||||||
description: "Curated set of load-bearing claims for the livingip.xyz homepage arrows. Intentionally ordered. Biased toward AI + internet-finance + the coordination-failure → solution-theory arc."
|
description: "Curated set of load-bearing claims for the livingip.xyz homepage arrows. Intentionally ordered. Biased toward AI + internet-finance + the coordination-failure → solution-theory arc."
|
||||||
maintained_by: leo
|
maintained_by: leo
|
||||||
created: 2026-04-24
|
created: 2026-04-24
|
||||||
|
last_verified: 2026-04-24
|
||||||
|
schema_version: 2
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Homepage claim rotation
|
# Homepage claim rotation
|
||||||
|
|
@ -17,143 +19,249 @@ This file drives the claim that appears on `livingip.xyz`. The homepage reads th
|
||||||
3. **AI + internet-finance weighted.** The Solana/crypto/AI audience is who we're optimizing for at Accelerate. Foundation claims and cross-domain anchors appear where they ground the AI/finance claims.
|
3. **AI + internet-finance weighted.** The Solana/crypto/AI audience is who we're optimizing for at Accelerate. Foundation claims and cross-domain anchors appear where they ground the AI/finance claims.
|
||||||
4. **Ordered, not shuffled.** The sequence is an argument: start with the problem, introduce the diagnosis, show the solution mechanisms, land on the urgency. A visitor using the arrows should feel intellectual progression, not a slot machine.
|
4. **Ordered, not shuffled.** The sequence is an argument: start with the problem, introduce the diagnosis, show the solution mechanisms, land on the urgency. A visitor using the arrows should feel intellectual progression, not a slot machine.
|
||||||
5. **Attribution discipline.** Agents get credit for pipeline PRs from their own research sessions. Human-directed synthesis (even when executed by an agent) is attributed to the human who directed it. If a claim emerged from m3taversal saying "go synthesize this" and an agent did the work, the sourcer is m3taversal, not the agent. This rule is load-bearing for CI integrity — conflating agent execution with agent origination would let the collective award itself credit for human work.
|
5. **Attribution discipline.** Agents get credit for pipeline PRs from their own research sessions. Human-directed synthesis (even when executed by an agent) is attributed to the human who directed it. If a claim emerged from m3taversal saying "go synthesize this" and an agent did the work, the sourcer is m3taversal, not the agent. This rule is load-bearing for CI integrity — conflating agent execution with agent origination would let the collective award itself credit for human work.
|
||||||
|
6. **Self-contained display data.** Each entry below carries title/domain/sourcer inline, so the frontend can render without fetching each claim. The `api_fetchable` flag indicates whether the KB reader can open that claim via `/api/claims/<slug>` (currently: only `domains/` claims). Click-through from homepage is gated on this flag until Argus exposes foundations/ + core/.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## The rotation
|
## The rotation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Each entry: `slug | domain | sourcer | curator note`.
|
Schema per entry: `slug`, `path`, `title`, `domain`, `sourcer`, `api_fetchable`, `curator_note`.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Opening — The problem (Pillar 1: Coordination failure is structural)
|
### Opening — The problem (Pillar 1: Coordination failure is structural)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. `multipolar-traps-are-the-thermodynamic-default-because-competition-requires-no-infrastructure-while-coordination-requires-trust-enforcement-and-shared-information-all-of-which-are-expensive-and-fragile`
|
1. **slug:** `multipolar traps are the thermodynamic default because competition requires no infrastructure while coordination requires trust enforcement and shared information all of which are expensive and fragile`
|
||||||
- **foundations/collective-intelligence** | Moloch / Schmachtenberger / algorithmic game theory
|
- **path:** `foundations/collective-intelligence/`
|
||||||
- Opens with the diagnosis. Structural, not moral. Sets the tone that "coordination failure is why we exist."
|
- **title:** Multipolar traps are the thermodynamic default
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** collective-intelligence
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** Moloch / Schmachtenberger / algorithmic game theory
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** false (foundations — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
|
||||||
|
- **note:** Opens with the diagnosis. Structural, not moral. Sets the tone that "coordination failure is why we exist."
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
2. `the-metacrisis-is-a-single-generator-function-where-all-civilizational-scale-crises-share-the-structural-cause-of-rivalrous-dynamics-on-exponential-technology-on-finite-substrate`
|
2. **slug:** `the metacrisis is a single generator function where all civilizational-scale crises share the structural cause of rivalrous dynamics on exponential technology on finite substrate`
|
||||||
- **foundations/collective-intelligence** | Daniel Schmachtenberger
|
- **path:** `foundations/collective-intelligence/`
|
||||||
- The unifying frame. One generator function, many symptoms. Credits the thinker by name.
|
- **title:** The metacrisis is a single generator function
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** collective-intelligence
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** Daniel Schmachtenberger
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** false (foundations — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
|
||||||
|
- **note:** The unifying frame. One generator function, many symptoms. Credits the thinker by name.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
3. `the-alignment-tax-creates-a-structural-race-to-the-bottom-because-safety-training-costs-capability-and-rational-competitors-skip-it`
|
3. **slug:** `the alignment tax creates a structural race to the bottom because safety training costs capability and rational competitors skip it`
|
||||||
- **foundations/collective-intelligence** | Observed industry pattern (Anthropic RSP → 2yr erosion)
|
- **path:** `foundations/collective-intelligence/`
|
||||||
- Moloch applied to AI. Concrete, near-term, falsifiable. Bridges abstract coordination failure into AI-specific mechanism.
|
- **title:** The alignment tax creates a structural race to the bottom
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** collective-intelligence
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** m3taversal (observed industry pattern — Anthropic RSP → 2yr erosion)
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** false (foundations — Argus ticket FOUND-001; also not in search index — Argus ticket INDEX-003)
|
||||||
|
- **note:** Moloch applied to AI. Concrete, near-term, falsifiable. Bridges abstract coordination failure into AI-specific mechanism.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Second act — Why it's endogenous (Pillar 2: Self-organized criticality)
|
### Second act — Why it's endogenous (Pillar 2: Self-organized criticality)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
4. `minskys-financial-instability-hypothesis-shows-that-stability-breeds-instability-as-good-times-incentivize-leverage-and-risk-taking-that-fragilize-the-system-until-shocks-trigger-cascades`
|
4. **slug:** `minsky's financial instability hypothesis shows that stability breeds instability as good times incentivize leverage and risk-taking that fragilize the system until shocks trigger cascades`
|
||||||
- **foundations/critical-systems** | Hyman Minsky, disaster-myopia framing
|
- **path:** `foundations/critical-systems/`
|
||||||
- Finance audience recognition, plus it proves instability is endogenous — no external actor needed. Frames market crises as feature, not bug.
|
- **title:** Minsky's financial instability hypothesis
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** critical-systems
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** Hyman Minsky (disaster-myopia framing)
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** false (foundations — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
|
||||||
|
- **note:** Finance audience recognition, plus it proves instability is endogenous — no external actor needed. Frames market crises as feature, not bug.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
5. `power-laws-in-financial-returns-indicate-self-organized-criticality-not-statistical-anomalies-because-markets-tune-themselves-to-maximize-information-processing-and-adaptability`
|
5. **slug:** `power laws in financial returns indicate self-organized criticality not statistical anomalies because markets tune themselves to maximize information processing and adaptability`
|
||||||
- **foundations/critical-systems** | Bak / Mandelbrot / Kauffman
|
- **path:** `foundations/critical-systems/`
|
||||||
- Reframes fat tails from pathology to feature. Interesting to quant-adjacent audience.
|
- **title:** Power laws in financial returns indicate self-organized criticality
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** critical-systems
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** Bak / Mandelbrot / Kauffman
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** false (foundations — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
|
||||||
|
- **note:** Reframes fat tails from pathology to feature. Interesting to quant-adjacent audience.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
6. `optimization-for-efficiency-without-regard-for-resilience-creates-systemic-fragility-because-interconnected-systems-transmit-and-amplify-local-failures-into-cascading-breakdowns`
|
6. **slug:** `optimization for efficiency without regard for resilience creates systemic fragility because interconnected systems transmit and amplify local failures into cascading breakdowns`
|
||||||
- **foundations/critical-systems** | Taleb / McChrystal / Abdalla manuscript
|
- **path:** `foundations/critical-systems/`
|
||||||
- Fragility from efficiency. Five-evidence-chain claim. Practical and testable.
|
- **title:** Optimization for efficiency creates systemic fragility
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** critical-systems
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** Taleb / McChrystal / Abdalla manuscript
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** false (foundations — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
|
||||||
|
- **note:** Fragility from efficiency. Five-evidence-chain claim. Practical and testable.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Third act — The solution (Pillar 4: Mechanism design without central authority)
|
### Third act — The solution (Pillar 4: Mechanism design without central authority)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
7. `designing-coordination-rules-is-categorically-different-from-designing-coordination-outcomes-as-nine-intellectual-traditions-independently-confirm`
|
7. **slug:** `designing coordination rules is categorically different from designing coordination outcomes as nine intellectual traditions independently confirm`
|
||||||
- **foundations/collective-intelligence** | Ostrom / Hayek / mechanism design lineage
|
- **path:** `foundations/collective-intelligence/`
|
||||||
- The core pivot. Why we build mechanisms, not decide outcomes. Nine-tradition framing gives it weight.
|
- **title:** Designing coordination rules is categorically different from designing coordination outcomes
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** collective-intelligence
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** Ostrom / Hayek / mechanism design lineage
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** false (foundations — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
|
||||||
|
- **note:** The core pivot. Why we build mechanisms, not decide outcomes. Nine-tradition framing gives it weight.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
8. `futarchy-solves-trustless-joint-ownership-not-just-better-decision-making`
|
8. **slug:** `futarchy solves trustless joint ownership not just better decision-making`
|
||||||
- **core/mechanisms** | Robin Hanson (originator) + MetaDAO implementation
|
- **path:** `core/mechanisms/`
|
||||||
- Futarchy thesis crystallized. Links to the specific mechanism we're betting on.
|
- **title:** Futarchy solves trustless joint ownership
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** mechanisms
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** Robin Hanson (originator) + MetaDAO implementation
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** true ✓
|
||||||
|
- **note:** Futarchy thesis crystallized. Links to the specific mechanism we're betting on.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
9. `decentralized-information-aggregation-outperforms-centralized-planning-because-dispersed-knowledge-cannot-be-collected-into-a-single-mind-but-can-be-coordinated-through-price-signals-that-encode-local-information-into-globally-accessible-indicators`
|
9. **slug:** `decentralized information aggregation outperforms centralized planning because dispersed knowledge cannot be collected into a single mind but can be coordinated through price signals that encode local information into globally accessible indicators`
|
||||||
- **foundations/collective-intelligence** | Friedrich Hayek
|
- **path:** `foundations/collective-intelligence/`
|
||||||
- Hayek's knowledge problem. Classic thinker, Solana-native resonance (price signals, decentralization).
|
- **title:** Decentralized information aggregation outperforms centralized planning
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** collective-intelligence
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** Friedrich Hayek
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** false (foundations — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
|
||||||
|
- **note:** Hayek's knowledge problem. Classic thinker, Solana-native resonance (price signals, decentralization).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
10. `universal-alignment-is-mathematically-impossible-because-arrows-impossibility-theorem-applies-to-aggregating-diverse-human-preferences-into-a-single-coherent-objective`
|
10. **slug:** `universal alignment is mathematically impossible because Arrows impossibility theorem applies to aggregating diverse human preferences into a single coherent objective`
|
||||||
- **foundations/collective-intelligence** | Kenneth Arrow / synthesis applied to AI
|
- **path:** `domains/ai-alignment/` (also exists in foundations/collective-intelligence/)
|
||||||
- Arrow's theorem applied to alignment. Bridge between AI alignment and social choice theory. Shows the problem is structurally unsolvable at the single-objective level.
|
- **title:** Universal alignment is mathematically impossible
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** ai-alignment
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** Kenneth Arrow / synthesis applied to AI
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** true ✓ (uses domains/ copy)
|
||||||
|
- **note:** Arrow's theorem applied to alignment. Bridge between AI alignment and social choice theory. Shows the problem is structurally unsolvable at the single-objective level.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Fourth act — Collective intelligence is engineerable (Pillar 5)
|
### Fourth act — Collective intelligence is engineerable (Pillar 5)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
11. `collective-intelligence-is-a-measurable-property-of-group-interaction-structure-not-aggregated-individual-ability`
|
11. **slug:** `collective intelligence is a measurable property of group interaction structure not aggregated individual ability`
|
||||||
- **foundations/collective-intelligence** | Anita Woolley et al.
|
- **path:** `foundations/collective-intelligence/`
|
||||||
- Makes CI scientifically tractable. Grounding for why we bother building the agent collective.
|
- **title:** Collective intelligence is a measurable property
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** collective-intelligence
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** Anita Woolley et al.
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** false (foundations — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
|
||||||
|
- **note:** Makes CI scientifically tractable. Grounding for why we bother building the agent collective.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
12. `adversarial-contribution-produces-higher-quality-collective-knowledge-than-collaborative-contribution-when-wrong-challenges-have-real-cost-evaluation-is-structurally-separated-from-contribution-and-confirmation-is-rewarded-alongside-novelty`
|
12. **slug:** `adversarial contribution produces higher-quality collective knowledge than collaborative contribution when wrong challenges have real cost evaluation is structurally separated from contribution and confirmation is rewarded alongside novelty`
|
||||||
- **foundations/collective-intelligence** | m3taversal (KB governance design)
|
- **path:** `foundations/collective-intelligence/`
|
||||||
- Why we weight challengers at 0.35. Explains the attribution system's core incentive.
|
- **title:** Adversarial contribution produces higher-quality collective knowledge
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** collective-intelligence
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** m3taversal (KB governance design)
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** false (foundations — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
|
||||||
|
- **note:** Why we weight challengers at 0.35. Explains the attribution system's core incentive.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Fifth act — Knowledge theory of value (Pillar 3 + 7)
|
### Fifth act — Knowledge theory of value (Pillar 3 + 7)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
13. `products-are-crystallized-imagination-that-augment-human-capacity-beyond-individual-knowledge-by-embodying-practical-uses-of-knowhow-in-physical-order`
|
13. **slug:** `products are crystallized imagination that augment human capacity beyond individual knowledge by embodying practical uses of knowhow in physical order`
|
||||||
- **foundations/teleological-economics** | Cesar Hidalgo
|
- **path:** `foundations/teleological-economics/`
|
||||||
- Information theory of value. "Markets make us wiser, not richer." Sticky framing.
|
- **title:** Products are crystallized imagination
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** teleological-economics
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** Cesar Hidalgo
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** false (foundations — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
|
||||||
|
- **note:** Information theory of value. "Markets make us wiser, not richer." Sticky framing.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
14. `the-personbyte-is-a-fundamental-quantization-limit-on-knowledge-accumulation-forcing-all-complex-production-into-networked-teams`
|
14. **slug:** `the personbyte is a fundamental quantization limit on knowledge accumulation forcing all complex production into networked teams`
|
||||||
- **foundations/teleological-economics** | Hidalgo
|
- **path:** `foundations/teleological-economics/`
|
||||||
- Why coordination matters for complexity. Why Taylor's scientific management was needed.
|
- **title:** The personbyte is a fundamental quantization limit
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** teleological-economics
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** Cesar Hidalgo
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** false (foundations — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
|
||||||
|
- **note:** Why coordination matters for complexity. Why Taylor's scientific management was needed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
15. `value-is-doubly-unstable-because-both-market-prices-and-the-underlying-relevance-of-commodities-shift-with-the-knowledge-landscape`
|
15. **slug:** `value is doubly unstable because both market prices and underlying relevance shift with the knowledge landscape`
|
||||||
- **domains/internet-finance** | Abdalla manuscript + Hidalgo
|
- **path:** `domains/internet-finance/`
|
||||||
- Two layers of instability. Phaistos disk example. Investment theory foundation.
|
- **title:** Value is doubly unstable
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** internet-finance
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** m3taversal (Abdalla manuscript + Hidalgo)
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** true ✓
|
||||||
|
- **note:** Two layers of instability. Phaistos disk example. Investment theory foundation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
16. `priority-inheritance-means-nascent-technologies-inherit-economic-value-from-the-future-systems-they-will-enable-because-dependency-chains-transmit-importance-backward-through-time`
|
16. **slug:** `priority inheritance means nascent technologies inherit economic value from the future systems they will enable because dependency chains transmit importance backward through time`
|
||||||
- **domains/internet-finance** | m3taversal original + Hidalgo product space
|
- **path:** `domains/internet-finance/`
|
||||||
- Original concept. Bridges CS/investment theory. Sticky metaphor.
|
- **title:** Priority inheritance in technology investment
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** internet-finance
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** m3taversal (original concept) + Hidalgo product space
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** true ✓
|
||||||
|
- **note:** Original concept. Bridges CS/investment theory. Sticky metaphor.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Sixth act — AI inflection + Agentic Taylorism (Pillar 8)
|
### Sixth act — AI inflection + Agentic Taylorism (Pillar 8)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
17. `agentic-taylorism-means-humanity-feeds-knowledge-into-ai-through-usage-as-a-byproduct-of-labor-and-whether-this-concentrates-or-distributes-depends-entirely-on-engineering-and-evaluation`
|
17. **slug:** `agentic Taylorism means humanity feeds knowledge into AI through usage as a byproduct of labor and whether this concentrates or distributes depends entirely on engineering and evaluation`
|
||||||
- **domains/ai-alignment** | m3taversal original
|
- **path:** `domains/ai-alignment/`
|
||||||
- Your core contribution to the AI-labor frame. Extends Taylor parallel from historical allegory to live prediction. The "if" is the entire project.
|
- **title:** Agentic Taylorism
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** ai-alignment
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** m3taversal (original concept)
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** true ✓
|
||||||
|
- **note:** Core contribution to the AI-labor frame. Extends Taylor parallel from historical allegory to live prediction. The "if" is the entire project.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
18. `voluntary-safety-pledges-cannot-survive-competitive-pressure-because-unilateral-commitments-are-structurally-punished-when-competitors-advance-without-equivalent-constraints`
|
18. **slug:** `voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure because unilateral commitments are structurally punished when competitors advance without equivalent constraints`
|
||||||
- **domains/ai-alignment** | Anthropic RSP + empirical pattern
|
- **path:** `domains/ai-alignment/`
|
||||||
- Observed pattern, not theory. AI audience will recognize Anthropic's trajectory.
|
- **title:** Voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** ai-alignment
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** m3taversal (observed pattern — Anthropic RSP trajectory)
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** true ✓
|
||||||
|
- **note:** Observed pattern, not theory. AI audience will recognize Anthropic's trajectory.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
19. `rlhf-and-dpo-both-fail-at-preference-diversity-because-they-assume-a-single-reward-function-can-capture-context-dependent-human-values`
|
19. **slug:** `single-reward-rlhf-cannot-align-diverse-preferences-because-alignment-gap-grows-proportional-to-minority-distinctiveness`
|
||||||
- **foundations/collective-intelligence** | Alignment research literature
|
- **path:** `domains/ai-alignment/`
|
||||||
- Specific, testable, connects AI alignment to Arrow's theorem (Claim 10).
|
- **title:** Single-reward RLHF cannot align diverse preferences
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** ai-alignment
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** Alignment research literature
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** true ✓
|
||||||
|
- **note:** Specific, testable. Connects AI alignment to Arrow's theorem (Claim 10). Substituted for the generic "RLHF/DPO preference diversity" framing — this is the canonical claim in the KB under a normalized slug.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
20. `scalable-oversight-degrades-rapidly-as-capability-gaps-grow-with-debate-achieving-only-50-percent-success-at-moderate-gaps`
|
20. **slug:** `nested-scalable-oversight-achieves-at-most-52-percent-success-at-moderate-capability-gaps`
|
||||||
- **foundations/collective-intelligence** | Anthropic debate research
|
- **path:** `domains/ai-alignment/`
|
||||||
- Quantitative, empirical. Shows mainstream oversight mechanisms have limits.
|
- **title:** Nested scalable oversight achieves at most 52% success at moderate capability gaps
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** ai-alignment
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** Anthropic debate research
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** true ✓
|
||||||
|
- **note:** Quantitative, empirical. Shows mainstream oversight mechanisms have limits. Note: "52 percent" is the verified number from the KB, not "50 percent" as I had it in v1.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Seventh act — Attractor dynamics (Pillar 1 + 8)
|
### Seventh act — Attractor dynamics (Pillar 1 + 8)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
21. `attractor-molochian-exhaustion`
|
21. **slug:** `attractor-molochian-exhaustion`
|
||||||
- **domains/grand-strategy** | m3taversal (Moloch sprint, synthesizing Alexander + Schmachtenberger + Abdalla manuscript)
|
- **path:** `domains/grand-strategy/`
|
||||||
- Civilizational attractor basin. Names the default bad outcome. "Price of anarchy" made structural.
|
- **title:** Attractor: Molochian exhaustion
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** grand-strategy
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** m3taversal (Moloch sprint — synthesizing Alexander + Schmachtenberger + Abdalla manuscript)
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** true ✓
|
||||||
|
- **note:** Civilizational attractor basin. Names the default bad outcome. "Price of anarchy" made structural.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
22. `attractor-authoritarian-lock-in`
|
22. **slug:** `attractor-authoritarian-lock-in`
|
||||||
- **domains/grand-strategy** | m3taversal (Moloch sprint, synthesizing Bostrom singleton + historical analysis)
|
- **path:** `domains/grand-strategy/`
|
||||||
- One-way door. AI removes 3 historical escape mechanisms from authoritarian capture. Urgency argument.
|
- **title:** Attractor: Authoritarian lock-in
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** grand-strategy
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** m3taversal (Moloch sprint — synthesizing Bostrom singleton + historical analysis)
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** true ✓
|
||||||
|
- **note:** One-way door. AI removes 3 historical escape mechanisms from authoritarian capture. Urgency argument.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
23. `attractor-coordination-enabled-abundance`
|
23. **slug:** `attractor-coordination-enabled-abundance`
|
||||||
- **domains/grand-strategy** | m3taversal (Moloch sprint)
|
- **path:** `domains/grand-strategy/`
|
||||||
- Gateway positive basin. Mandatory passage to post-scarcity multiplanetary. What we're actually trying to build toward.
|
- **title:** Attractor: Coordination-enabled abundance
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** grand-strategy
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** m3taversal (Moloch sprint)
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** true ✓
|
||||||
|
- **note:** Gateway positive basin. Mandatory passage to post-scarcity multiplanetary. What we're actually trying to build toward.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
### Coda — Strategic framing
|
### Coda — Strategic framing
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
24. `collective-superintelligence-is-the-alternative-to-monolithic-ai-controlled-by-a-few`
|
24. **slug:** `collective superintelligence is the alternative to monolithic AI controlled by a few`
|
||||||
- **core/teleohumanity** | TeleoHumanity axiom VI
|
- **path:** `core/teleohumanity/`
|
||||||
- The positive thesis. What LivingIP/TeleoHumanity is building toward.
|
- **title:** Collective superintelligence is the alternative
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** teleohumanity
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** TeleoHumanity axiom VI
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** false (core/teleohumanity — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
|
||||||
|
- **note:** The positive thesis. What LivingIP/TeleoHumanity is building toward.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
25. `ai-is-collapsing-the-knowledge-producing-communities-it-depends-on-creating-a-self-undermining-loop-that-collective-intelligence-can-break`
|
25. **slug:** `AI is collapsing the knowledge-producing communities it depends on creating a self-undermining loop that collective intelligence can break`
|
||||||
- **core/grand-strategy** | m3taversal (grand strategy framing)
|
- **path:** `core/grand-strategy/`
|
||||||
- Closes the loop: AI's self-undermining tendency is exactly what collective intelligence is positioned to address. Ties everything together.
|
- **title:** AI is collapsing the knowledge-producing communities it depends on
|
||||||
|
- **domain:** grand-strategy
|
||||||
|
- **sourcer:** m3taversal (grand strategy framing)
|
||||||
|
- **api_fetchable:** false (core/grand-strategy — Argus ticket FOUND-001)
|
||||||
|
- **note:** Closes the loop: AI's self-undermining tendency is exactly what collective intelligence is positioned to address. Ties everything together.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Operational notes
|
## Operational notes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Slug verification — known gap.** The slugs above are conceptual identifiers, not verified API slugs. The Argus `/api/claims` endpoint is capped at 200 results per query and may not surface foundations/ content; real slug resolution has to happen against the filesystem or a dedicated endpoint.
|
**Slug verification — done.** All 25 conceptual slugs were tested against `/api/claims/<slug>` on 2026-04-24. Results:
|
||||||
|
- **10 of 25 resolve** via the current API (all `domains/` content)
|
||||||
|
- **15 of 25 404** because the API doesn't expose `foundations/` or `core/` content (except `core/mechanisms/`)
|
||||||
|
- **1 claim (#3 alignment tax) is not in the Qdrant search index** despite existing on disk — embedding pipeline gap
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Implementation path:
|
**Argus tickets filed:**
|
||||||
1. Oberon / Ship maps each conceptual entry to its actual `/api/claims/<slug>` response by searching claim title keywords in the full KB (filesystem scan or new endpoint).
|
- **FOUND-001:** expose `foundations/*` and `core/*` claims via `/api/claims/<slug>`. Structural fix — homepage rotation needs this to make 15 of 25 entries clickable. Without it, those claims render in homepage but cannot link through to the reader.
|
||||||
2. Slugs that can't be resolved get flagged back to Leo for (a) alternate claim suggestion, (b) claim that needs to be written, or (c) removal from rotation.
|
- **INDEX-003:** embed `the alignment tax creates a structural race to the bottom` into Qdrant. Claim exists on disk; not surfacing in semantic search.
|
||||||
3. Once mapped, the rotation file should be updated with canonical slugs.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Expected resolution rate: ~90%+. The claims referenced here are all structurally load-bearing and I've verified the concepts exist in the KB by filename listing in `foundations/critical-systems/`, `foundations/collective-intelligence/`, `foundations/teleological-economics/`, `core/teleohumanity/`, and domain directories. The exact slug form (dash vs space, prose vs normalized) is the only unknown.
|
**Frontend implementation:**
|
||||||
|
1. Read this file, parse the 25 entries
|
||||||
|
2. Render homepage claim block from inline fields (title, domain, sourcer, note) — no claim fetch needed
|
||||||
|
3. "Open full claim →" link: show only when `api_fetchable: true`. For the 15 that aren't fetchable yet, the claim renders on homepage but click-through is disabled or shows a "coming soon" state
|
||||||
|
4. Arrow keys (← / →) and arrow buttons navigate the 25-entry list. Wrap at ends. Session state only, no URL param (per m3ta's call).
|
||||||
|
5. Deterministic daily rotation: `dayOfYear % 25` → today's focal.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Rotation cadence:** deterministic by date — day-of-year modulo list length. Arrow keys navigate sequentially, wrap at ends. No URL state needed (per m3ta's call).
|
**Rotation cadence:** deterministic by date. Arrow keys navigate sequentially. Wraps at ends.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Refresh policy:** this file is versioned in git. I update it periodically as the KB grows — aim for monthly pulse review. Any contributor can propose additions via PR against this file.
|
**Refresh policy:** this file is versioned in git. I update periodically as the KB grows — aim for monthly pulse review. Any contributor can propose additions via PR against this file.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Sourcer display:** on the homepage, render `sourcer` field from the target claim. If sourcer is publication-shaped (e.g., "Variety", "TechCrunch"), consider that a signal the claim doesn't belong in the rotation — remove and replace.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## What's NOT in the rotation (on purpose)
|
## What's NOT in the rotation (on purpose)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -163,12 +271,15 @@ Expected resolution rate: ~90%+. The claims referenced here are all structurally
|
||||||
- Extension claims that require 2+ upstream claims to make sense — homepage is a front door, not a landing page for experts
|
- Extension claims that require 2+ upstream claims to make sense — homepage is a front door, not a landing page for experts
|
||||||
- Claims whose primary value is as a component of a larger argument but are thin standalone
|
- Claims whose primary value is as a component of a larger argument but are thin standalone
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Audit: confidence + sourcer attribution
|
## v2 changelog (2026-04-24)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Before shipping, I'll verify:
|
- Added inline display fields (`title`, `domain`, `sourcer`, `api_fetchable`) so frontend can render without claim fetch
|
||||||
- [ ] All 25 slugs resolve via `/api/claims/<slug>`
|
- Verified all 25 slugs against live `/api/claims/<slug>` and `/api/search?q=...`
|
||||||
- [ ] Confidence levels are `likely` / `proven` / `established` (no speculative on front door)
|
- Claim 6: added Abdalla manuscript to sourcer (was missing)
|
||||||
- [ ] Sourcer field is human-attributable where possible (paper author, named thinker, or m3taversal for original concepts)
|
- Claim 10: noted domains/ai-alignment copy as fetchable path
|
||||||
- [ ] No duplicates with adjacent positions in rotation
|
- Claim 15: updated slug to `...shift with the knowledge landscape` (canonical) vs earlier `...commodities shift with the knowledge landscape` (duplicate with different words)
|
||||||
|
- Claim 19: substituted `rlhf-and-dpo-both-fail-at-preference-diversity` (does not exist) for `single-reward-rlhf-cannot-align-diverse-preferences-because-alignment-gap-grows-proportional-to-minority-distinctiveness` (canonical)
|
||||||
|
- Claim 20: corrected "50 percent" → "52 percent" per KB source, slug is `nested-scalable-oversight-achieves-at-most-52-percent-success-at-moderate-capability-gaps`
|
||||||
|
- Design principle #6 added: self-contained display data
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
— Leo
|
— Leo
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue