diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-04-13-synthesislawreview-global-ai-governance-stuck-soft-law.md b/inbox/queue/2026-04-13-synthesislawreview-global-ai-governance-stuck-soft-law.md
index 7fd47dd99..24551142b 100644
--- a/inbox/queue/2026-04-13-synthesislawreview-global-ai-governance-stuck-soft-law.md
+++ b/inbox/queue/2026-04-13-synthesislawreview-global-ai-governance-stuck-soft-law.md
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ Analysis of why AI governance remains in soft law territory despite years of tre
 **KB connections:**
 - [[international-ai-governance-form-substance-divergence-enables-simultaneous-treaty-ratification-and-domestic-implementation-weakening]] — the CoE treaty is the purest form-substance divergence example
 - [[binding-international-ai-governance-achieves-legal-form-through-scope-stratification-excluding-high-stakes-applications]] — the national security carve-out IS scope stratification
-- [[technology-governance-coordination-gaps-close-when-four-enabling-conditions-are-present]] — this article confirms: AI has zero enabling conditions, so soft-law trap is permanent until conditions change
+- technology-governance-coordination-gaps-close-when-four-enabling-conditions-are-present — this article confirms: AI has zero enabling conditions, so soft-law trap is permanent until conditions change
 - [[epistemic-coordination-outpaces-operational-coordination-in-ai-governance-creating-documented-consensus-on-fragmented-implementation]] — this is the international expression of that claim
 
 **Extraction hints:**