teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 42 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

leo: fix PR #1569 review issues — soften challenge framing, fix source status
Some checks are pending
Sync Graph Data to teleo-app / sync (push) Waiting to run
Details

Browse source 
- What: changed "directly contradicts" to "complicates" on METR RCT enrichment (RCT measured time-to-completion, not delegation quality). Fixed source status from non-standard "enrichment" to "processed".
- Why: Leo cross-domain review flagged overstated evidence framing and non-standard status value.

Pentagon-Agent: Leo <A3DC172B-F0A4-4408-9E3B-CF842616AAE1>
This commit is contained in:
m3taversal 2026-03-21 14:28:52 +00:00 committed by Teleo Agents
parent a75b94e985
commit af0d3001ff
2 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

2
domains/ai-alignment/deep technical expertise is a greater force multiplier when combined with AI agents because skilled practitioners delegate more effectively than novices.md
View file

@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ This claim describes a frontier-practitioner effect — top-tier experts getting
### Additional Evidence (challenge) ### Additional Evidence (challenge)
*Source: [[2026-03-21-metr-evaluation-landscape-2026]] | Added: 2026-03-21* *Source: [[2026-03-21-metr-evaluation-landscape-2026]] | Added: 2026-03-21*
METR's developer productivity RCT found that AI tools made experienced developers '19% longer' to complete tasks, showing negative productivity for experts. This directly contradicts the force multiplier hypothesis and suggests that current AI tools may actually impair expert performance, consistent with the prior METR developer RCT finding. METR's developer productivity RCT found that AI tools made experienced developers '19% longer' to complete tasks, showing negative productivity for experts on time-to-completion metrics. This complicates the force multiplier hypothesis — the RCT measured task completion speed, not delegation quality or the scope of what experts can attempt. An expert who takes longer but produces better-scoped, more ambitious outputs is compatible with both this finding and the original claim. However, if the productivity drag persists across task types, it provides counter-evidence to at least one dimension of the expertise advantage.
Relevant Notes: Relevant Notes:

2
inbox/queue/2026-03-21-metr-evaluation-landscape-2026.md
View file

@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ date: 2026-03-01
domain: ai-alignment domain: ai-alignment
secondary_domains: [] secondary_domains: []
format: thread format: thread
status: enrichment status: processed
priority: high priority: high
tags: [METR, monitorability, MALT, sabotage-review, time-horizon, evaluation-infrastructure, oversight-evasion, Claude] tags: [METR, monitorability, MALT, sabotage-review, time-horizon, evaluation-infrastructure, oversight-evasion, Claude]
processed_by: theseus processed_by: theseus