auto-fix: strip 5 broken wiki links

Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.

inbox/queue/2026-01-xx-spacenews-wef-clear-orbit-secure-future-spx-refuses-governance-standards.md

@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ SpaceX notably **did not endorse the guidelines**. The article states: "Some maj
 
 **Extraction hints:**
 - New claim candidate: "SpaceX's refusal to endorse WEF debris governance standards despite operating 63% of active satellites is the clearest instantiation of commons tragedy in the orbital commons"
-- Possible enrichment to [[orbital debris is a classic commons tragedy]] with this concrete 2026 evidence
+- Possible enrichment to orbital debris is a classic commons tragedy with this concrete 2026 evidence
 - Cross-domain flag for Leo: voluntary governance failure with the largest actor is a pattern across multiple commons (LEO, internet, AI). Does this deserve a synthesis claim?
 
 **Context:** WEF has governance legitimacy but no enforcement authority. The relevant enforcement would be FCC (can condition licenses), IADC (advisory only), or bilateral agreements through Artemis Accords (doesn't cover debris directly). The governance gap is not knowledge — it's enforcement.

inbox/queue/2026-05-05-aublr-fcc-five-year-deorbit-rule-compliance-industry-impact.md

@@ -59,8 +59,8 @@ intake_tier: research-task
 
 **KB connections:**
 - [[orbital debris is a classic commons tragedy where individual launch incentives are private but collision risk is externalized to all operators]] — FCC rule is the Ostrom institutional framework attempt; ADR gap is the Ostrom "monitoring and enforcement" weakness
-- [[space governance gaps are widening not narrowing]] — FCC 5-year rule (2024 effective) is the best governance progress in this area, but Frontiers 2026 shows it's insufficient without ADR mandate
+- space governance gaps are widening not narrowing — FCC 5-year rule (2024 effective) is the best governance progress in this area, but Frontiers 2026 shows it's insufficient without ADR mandate
-- [[the Artemis Accords replace multilateral treaty-making with bilateral norm-setting]] — FCC 5-year rule is analogous: unilateral domestic rule-making that creates de facto international norm for US-licensed operators
+- the Artemis Accords replace multilateral treaty-making with bilateral norm-setting — FCC 5-year rule is analogous: unilateral domestic rule-making that creates de facto international norm for US-licensed operators
 
 **Extraction hints:**
 - Possible enrichment to orbital debris commons tragedy claim: "FCC 5-year deorbit rule (2024) represents binding governance for US-licensed operators but remains insufficient without active debris removal mandates — compliance with the rule does not prevent debris growth under any current projections"

inbox/queue/2026-05-05-nasa-neo-surveyor-takes-shape-45pct-phas-discovered-survey-status.md

@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@ intake_tier: research-task
 
 **KB connections:**
 - Belief 1 (multiplanetary imperative): The survey gap directly validates why asteroid impact remains a live existential risk even with deflection capability
-- [[the 30-year space economy attractor state is a cislunar industrial system]] — planetary defense infrastructure is complementary to space development, not substitute
+- the 30-year space economy attractor state is a cislunar industrial system — planetary defense infrastructure is complementary to space development, not substitute
 - No existing KB claim specifically covers NEO survey completion status — this would be a new claim area
 
 **Extraction hints:**

inbox/queue/2026-11-xx-esa-hera-mission-didymos-november-2026-arrival-early.md

@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ The March 2026 publication showing DART shifted the binary system's solar orbit
 
 **KB connections:**
 - Belief 1 (multiplanetary imperative): planetary defense capability advancing, but scope-limited
-- [[space governance gaps are widening not narrowing]] — Hera represents international coordination working (ESA + NASA + multiple countries) in the planetary defense domain, which is interesting as a positive governance case vs. the orbital debris governance failure
+- space governance gaps are widening not narrowing — Hera represents international coordination working (ESA + NASA + multiple countries) in the planetary defense domain, which is interesting as a positive governance case vs. the orbital debris governance failure
 - The DART/Hera collaboration is an interesting counterpoint to the Artemis Accords bilateral approach — this is multilateral scientific cooperation working well
 
 **Extraction hints:**