diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-03-09-andrewseb555-x-archive.md b/inbox/archive/2026-03-09-andrewseb555-x-archive.md
index dbd0203..0df983e 100644
--- a/inbox/archive/2026-03-09-andrewseb555-x-archive.md
+++ b/inbox/archive/2026-03-09-andrewseb555-x-archive.md
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ url: https://x.com/AndrewSeb555
 date: 2026-03-09
 domain: internet-finance
 format: tweet
-status: unprocessed
+status: null-result
 tags: [wider-ecosystem, governance, arbitrage, ai-agents, trading]
 linked_set: metadao-x-landscape-2026-03
 curator_notes: |
@@ -21,6 +21,11 @@ extraction_hints:
   - "Liquidation process improvement discussions — enrichment for governance claims"
   - "Low priority — moderate signal, mostly ecosystem participation"
 priority: low
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-03-10
+enrichments_applied: ["futarchy-governed-liquidation-is-the-enforcement-mechanism-that-makes-unruggable-ICOs-credible-because-investors-can-force-full-treasury-return-when-teams-materially-misrepresent.md", "futarchy-adoption-faces-friction-from-token-price-psychology-proposal-complexity-and-liquidity-requirements.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
+extraction_notes: "Low-priority source as flagged by curator. Primary value is empirical market data (60-70% arb spreads) confirming liquidity friction in futarchy adoption. Liquidation process improvement discussions indicate iterative governance refinement. No novel claims - author is ecosystem participant rather than builder/analyst. WLFI and Clarity Act mentions are regulatory context but no specific claims extractable. Most content is ecosystem participation noise rather than substantive analysis."
 ---
 
 # @AndrewSeb555 X Archive (March 2026)
@@ -40,3 +45,9 @@ priority: low
 
 ## Noise Filtered Out
 - 26% noise — community engagement, casual takes
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- 60-70% arbitrage opportunities observed in MetaDAO futarchy markets (March 2026)
+- 5 MetaDAO references in 100 tweets (moderate ecosystem engagement)
+- 74% substantive content ratio