diff --git a/inbox/archive/2025-06-00-panews-futarchy-governance-weapons.md b/inbox/archive/2025-06-00-panews-futarchy-governance-weapons.md
index 1895f46b1..c8f34d1de 100644
--- a/inbox/archive/2025-06-00-panews-futarchy-governance-weapons.md
+++ b/inbox/archive/2025-06-00-panews-futarchy-governance-weapons.md
@@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2025-06-00
 domain: internet-finance
 secondary_domains: [collective-intelligence]
 format: article
-status: unprocessed
+status: null-result
 priority: high
 tags: [futarchy, prediction-markets, governance, optimism, self-referential, gamification]
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2025-06-15
+enrichments_applied: ["futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md", "domain-expertise-loses-to-trading-skill-in-futarchy-markets-because-prediction-accuracy-requires-calibration-not-just-knowledge.md", "futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders.md", "speculative markets aggregate information through incentive and selection effects not wisdom of crowds.md", "MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
+extraction_notes: "Three new claims extracted focusing on self-referential dynamic (major gap in KB), gamification frame (category shift in value proposition), and information asymmetry. Five enrichments applied: extending UX friction documentation, confirming domain-expertise-loses claim with strong evidence, challenging manipulation-resistance with self-referential vector, extending speculative-markets-aggregate with strategic positioning dimension, and extending MetaDAO volume claim with quality-volume disconnect. The self-referential paradox is the most significant new insight—it's a fundamental challenge to futarchy theory not currently captured in the KB."
 ---
 
 ## Content
@@ -53,3 +58,14 @@ Unlike pure prediction markets (Polymarket predicting elections), futarchy's pre
 PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders]]
 WHY ARCHIVED: Identifies the self-referential paradox — a fundamental challenge to futarchy's theoretical foundations not currently captured in KB
 EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the self-referential dynamic as a NEW challenge distinct from manipulation resistance — this is about the feedback loop between prediction and outcome, not about bad actors
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- Optimism March 2025 futarchy experiment: 2,262 visitors, 19% conversion rate, 5,898 total transactions
+- Average 13.6 transactions per participant, top performer 406 transactions in 3 days
+- 41% of participants joined in final three days, 41% hedged to avoid losses
+- Only 4 of 20 top forecasters held OP governance credentials
+- All futarchy-selected projects declined $15.8M TVL collectively
+- Grants Council picks grew: Extra Finance +$8M TVL, QiDAO +$10M TVL
+- 45% of projects didn't disclose plans
+- Single bet required 6 on-chain interactions