extract: 2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content
Pentagon-Agent: Ganymede <F99EBFA6-547B-4096-BEEA-1D59C3E4028A>
This commit is contained in:
parent
af067944f1
commit
b1ba1ba675
3 changed files with 27 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -33,6 +33,12 @@ This claim extends futarchy-governed-permissionless-launches-require-brand-separ
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Phonon Studio AI raised $88,888 target but ended in 'Refunding' status within one day (launched 2026-03-05, closed 2026-03-06). The project had live product traction (1000+ songs generated in first week, functional tokenized AI artist logic) but still failed to attract capital, suggesting futarchy-governed launches face quality perception issues even when projects demonstrate real product-market validation.
|
Phonon Studio AI raised $88,888 target but ended in 'Refunding' status within one day (launched 2026-03-05, closed 2026-03-06). The project had live product traction (1000+ songs generated in first week, functional tokenized AI artist logic) but still failed to attract capital, suggesting futarchy-governed launches face quality perception issues even when projects demonstrate real product-market validation.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
|
||||||
|
*Source: [[2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Futardio proposal lists 'Makes futarchy look less serious' and 'May make it harder to sell DeFi DAOs / non-crypto organizations' as explicit potential pitfalls, demonstrating MetaDAO's awareness of the reputational cost. The proposal's failure (status: Failed) provides empirical validation that the market rejected this tradeoff.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Relevant Notes:
|
Relevant Notes:
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -34,6 +34,12 @@ This claim complements [[coin price is the fairest objective function for asset
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
MetaDAO's Futardio proposal explicitly states: 'One of the ideal use-cases for futarchy is memecoin governance. This is because memecoin holders only want the price of the token to increase. There's no question of "maybe the market knows what's the best short-term action, but not the best long-term action."' This provides direct confirmation from MetaDAO itself that memecoins eliminate the temporal tradeoff problem that complicates futarchy in other contexts.
|
MetaDAO's Futardio proposal explicitly states: 'One of the ideal use-cases for futarchy is memecoin governance. This is because memecoin holders only want the price of the token to increase. There's no question of "maybe the market knows what's the best short-term action, but not the best long-term action."' This provides direct confirmation from MetaDAO itself that memecoins eliminate the temporal tradeoff problem that complicates futarchy in other contexts.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
|
||||||
|
*Source: [[2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
MetaDAO proposal explicitly identifies memecoins as 'ideal use-cases for futarchy' because 'memecoin holders only want the price of the token to increase. There's no question of maybe the market knows what's the best short-term action, but not the best long-term action.' This confirms the single-objective-function thesis with direct practitioner reasoning.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Relevant Notes:
|
Relevant Notes:
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -6,9 +6,13 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/EmPUGgv2Utzuu2vgSu6GcTRAtJMox5vJeZKi95cBgfJ
|
||||||
date: 2024-08-28
|
date: 2024-08-28
|
||||||
domain: internet-finance
|
domain: internet-finance
|
||||||
format: data
|
format: data
|
||||||
status: unprocessed
|
status: enrichment
|
||||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||||
event_type: proposal
|
event_type: proposal
|
||||||
|
processed_by: rio
|
||||||
|
processed_date: 2026-03-16
|
||||||
|
enrichments_applied: ["memecoin-governance-is-ideal-futarchy-use-case-because-single-objective-function-eliminates-long-term-tradeoff-ambiguity.md", "futarchy-governed-memecoin-launchpads-face-reputational-risk-tradeoff-between-adoption-and-credibility.md"]
|
||||||
|
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Proposal Details
|
## Proposal Details
|
||||||
|
|
@ -352,3 +356,13 @@ This would all be left to the discretion of the team building it, but they would
|
||||||
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
||||||
- Completed: 2024-09-01
|
- Completed: 2024-09-01
|
||||||
- Ended: 2024-09-01
|
- Ended: 2024-09-01
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Key Facts
|
||||||
|
- MetaDAO futardio proposal created 2024-08-28, failed 2024-09-01
|
||||||
|
- Proposed $100k grant over 6 months for futardio development
|
||||||
|
- Futardio would allocate portion of each memecoin to futarchy DAO
|
||||||
|
- Points would convert to $FUTA token within 180 days
|
||||||
|
- Target launch was Q3 2024
|
||||||
|
- Proposal account: EmPUGgv2Utzuu2vgSu6GcTRAtJMox5vJeZKi95cBgfJo
|
||||||
|
- Nallok and Proph3t would support team but not be core team
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue