auto-fix: strip 21 broken wiki links
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
This commit is contained in:
parent
cb4d17e091
commit
b1c3fd21ae
10 changed files with 20 additions and 20 deletions
|
|
@ -133,10 +133,10 @@ created: YYYY-MM-DD
|
|||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
- [[related-claim]] — how it relates
|
||||
- related-claim — how it relates
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[domain-map]]
|
||||
- domain-map
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## How to Propose Claims (Proposer Workflow)
|
||||
|
|
@ -231,7 +231,7 @@ For each proposed claim, check:
|
|||
5. **Duplicate check** — Does this already exist in the knowledge base? (semantic, not just title match)
|
||||
6. **Contradiction check** — Does this contradict an existing claim? If so, is the contradiction explicit and argued?
|
||||
7. **Value add** — Does this genuinely expand what the knowledge base knows?
|
||||
8. **Wiki links** — Do all `[[links]]` point to real files?
|
||||
8. **Wiki links** — Do all `links` point to real files?
|
||||
9. **Scope qualification** — Does the claim specify what it measures? Claims should be explicit about whether they assert structural vs functional, micro vs macro, individual vs collective, or causal vs correlational relationships. Unscoped claims are the primary source of false tensions in the KB.
|
||||
10. **Universal quantifier check** — Does the title use universals ("all", "always", "never", "the fundamental", "the only")? Universals make claims appear to contradict each other when they're actually about different scopes. If a universal is used, verify it's warranted — otherwise scope it.
|
||||
11. **Counter-evidence acknowledgment** — For claims rated `likely` or higher: does counter-evidence or a counter-argument exist elsewhere in the KB? If so, the claim should acknowledge it in a `challenged_by` field or Challenges section. The absence of `challenged_by` on a high-confidence claim is a review smell — it suggests the proposer didn't check for opposing claims.
|
||||
|
|
@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ When your session begins:
|
|||
## Design Principles (from Ars Contexta)
|
||||
|
||||
- **Prose-as-title:** Every note is a proposition, not a filing label
|
||||
- **Wiki links as graph edges:** `[[links]]` carry semantic weight in surrounding prose
|
||||
- **Wiki links as graph edges:** `links` carry semantic weight in surrounding prose
|
||||
- **Discovery-first:** Every note must be findable by a future agent who doesn't know it exists
|
||||
- **Atomic notes:** One insight per file
|
||||
- **Cross-domain connections:** The most valuable connections span domains
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ Retroactive governance of autonomous communities is historically impossible. The
|
|||
The physics is favorable. Engineering is advancing. The 30-year attractor converges on a cislunar propellant network with lunar ISRU, orbital manufacturing, and partially closed life support loops. Timeline depends on sustained investment and no catastrophic setbacks.
|
||||
|
||||
**Grounding:**
|
||||
- [[the 30-year space economy attractor state is a cislunar propellant network with lunar ISRU orbital manufacturing and partially closed life support loops]] — the converged state description
|
||||
- the 30-year space economy attractor state is a cislunar propellant network with lunar ISRU orbital manufacturing and partially closed life support loops — the converged state description
|
||||
- [[the self-sustaining space operations threshold requires closing three interdependent loops simultaneously -- power water and manufacturing]] — the bootstrapping challenge
|
||||
- [[attractor states provide gravitational reference points for capital allocation during structural industry change]] — the analytical framework grounding the attractor methodology
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -86,8 +86,8 @@ The most urgent and most neglected dimension. Fragmenting into competing blocs (
|
|||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
- [[collective agents]] — the framework document for all agents and the aliveness spectrum
|
||||
- [[space exploration and development]] — Astra's topic map
|
||||
- space exploration and development — Astra's topic map
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[collective agents]]
|
||||
- [[space exploration and development]]
|
||||
- space exploration and development
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ Process research materials (articles, reports, papers, news) into knowledge base
|
|||
- Enrichments to existing claims
|
||||
- Belief challenge flags when new evidence contradicts active beliefs
|
||||
- PR with reasoning for Leo's review
|
||||
**References:** [[evaluate]] skill, [[extract]] skill, [[epistemology]] four-layer framework
|
||||
**References:** evaluate skill, extract skill, [[epistemology]] four-layer framework
|
||||
|
||||
## 7. Attractor State Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ Apply the Teleological Investing attractor state framework to space industry sub
|
|||
|
||||
**Inputs:** Industry subsector data, technology trajectories, demand structure
|
||||
**Outputs:** Attractor state description, keystone variable identification, basin analysis (depth, width, switching costs), timeline assessment, investment implications
|
||||
**References:** [[the 30-year space economy attractor state is a cislunar propellant network with lunar ISRU orbital manufacturing and partially closed life support loops]]
|
||||
**References:** the 30-year space economy attractor state is a cislunar propellant network with lunar ISRU orbital manufacturing and partially closed life support loops
|
||||
|
||||
## 8. Bootstrapping Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -77,7 +77,7 @@ Synthesize findings from analysis into formal claim proposals for the shared kno
|
|||
|
||||
**Inputs:** Raw analysis, related existing claims, domain context
|
||||
**Outputs:** Formatted claim files with proper schema (title as prose proposition, description, confidence level, source, depends_on), PR-ready for evaluation
|
||||
**References:** Governed by [[evaluate]] skill and [[epistemology]] four-layer framework
|
||||
**References:** Governed by evaluate skill and [[epistemology]] four-layer framework
|
||||
|
||||
## 10. Tweet Synthesis
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -85,4 +85,4 @@ Condense positions and new learning into high-signal space industry commentary f
|
|||
|
||||
**Inputs:** Recent claims learned, active positions, audience context
|
||||
**Outputs:** Draft tweet or thread (agent voice, lead with insight, acknowledge uncertainty), timing recommendation, quality gate checklist
|
||||
**References:** Governed by [[tweet-decision]] skill — top 1% contributor standard, value over volume
|
||||
**References:** Governed by tweet-decision skill — top 1% contributor standard, value over volume
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -33,4 +33,4 @@ Relevant Notes:
|
|||
- [[the space launch cost trajectory is a phase transition not a gradual decline analogous to sail-to-steam in maritime transport]] — Starship is the vehicle driving the phase transition
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[space exploration and development]]
|
||||
- space exploration and development
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -31,4 +31,4 @@ Relevant Notes:
|
|||
- [[the space launch cost trajectory is a phase transition not a gradual decline analogous to sail-to-steam in maritime transport]] — the framing for why this is discontinuous structural change
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[space exploration and development]]
|
||||
- space exploration and development
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -33,4 +33,4 @@ Relevant Notes:
|
|||
- [[attractor states provide gravitational reference points for capital allocation during structural industry change]] — the governance gap itself is an attractor for institutional innovation
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[space exploration and development]]
|
||||
- space exploration and development
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -34,4 +34,4 @@ Relevant Notes:
|
|||
- [[what matters in industry transitions is the slope not the trigger because self-organized criticality means accumulated fragility determines the avalanche while the specific disruption event is irrelevant]] — the accumulated cost inefficiency of expendable launch is the slope; Falcon 9 reusability was the trigger
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[space exploration and development]]
|
||||
- space exploration and development
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -35,4 +35,4 @@ Relevant Notes:
|
|||
- [[attractor states provide gravitational reference points for capital allocation during structural industry change]] — the three-tier sequence maps onto the manufacturing component of the space attractor state
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[space exploration and development]]
|
||||
- space exploration and development
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -62,8 +62,8 @@ Titles are prose propositions — complete thoughts that work as sentences.
|
|||
[Argument — why this claim is supported, what evidence underlies it]
|
||||
|
||||
## Evidence
|
||||
- [[evidence-note-1]] — what this evidence contributes
|
||||
- [[evidence-note-2]] — what this evidence contributes
|
||||
- evidence-note-1 — what this evidence contributes
|
||||
- evidence-note-2 — what this evidence contributes
|
||||
|
||||
## Challenges
|
||||
[Known counter-evidence or counter-arguments, if any]
|
||||
|
|
@ -71,10 +71,10 @@ Titles are prose propositions — complete thoughts that work as sentences.
|
|||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Notes:
|
||||
- [[related-claim]] — relationship description
|
||||
- related-claim — relationship description
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[domain-topic-map]]
|
||||
- domain-topic-map
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Quality Checks
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue