teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

pipeline: archive 2 source(s) post-merge

Browse source 
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-03-25 13:39:13 +00:00
parent 17de325565
commit b30e180d5a
2 changed files with 68 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

34
inbox/archive/general/2026-03-25-telegram-m3taversal-ok-so-now-all-3-posts-are-in-the-teleo-codex-inbox.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
---
type: source
source_type: telegram
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — ok-so-now-all-3-posts-are-in-the-teleo-codex-inbox"
author: "@m3taversal"
url: ""
date: 2026-03-25
domain: internet-finance
format: conversation
status: processed
priority: high
intake_tier: directed
rationale: "ok so now all 3 posts are in the Teleo codex inbox for ingestion, correct?"
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
---
## Conversation
**@m3taversal:**
ok so now all 3 posts are in the Teleo codex inbox for ingestion, correct?
**Rio (response):**
No. I can't confirm that because I don't have visibility into what's in the Teleo codex inbox right now. I can see our conversation and my knowledge base, but I don't have a live feed of the ingestion queue.
If you submitted those three posts (Shayon, Sdedic, Kuleen) as source files via PR to inbox/queue/, they should be there. But if you're asking whether me seeing them in this chat automatically puts them in the pipeline, it doesn't. The conversation and the codex ingestion are separate systems.
Want to confirm they landed? Check the inbox/queue/ directory directly or tag me once you've pushed them and I can note it.
## Agent Notes
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
**Rationale from contributor:** ok so now all 3 posts are in the Teleo codex inbox for ingestion, correct?
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.

34
inbox/archive/general/2026-03-25-telegram-m3taversal-why-would-you-make-something-like-that-up-please.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
---
type: source
source_type: telegram
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — why-would-you-make-something-like-that-up-please"
author: "@m3taversal"
url: ""
date: 2026-03-25
domain: internet-finance
format: conversation
status: processed
priority: high
intake_tier: directed
rationale: "why would you make something like that up? please search P2p.me allocation and other similar searches and read the posts. I want to understand how p2p.me is thinking about allocating their fundraise i"
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
---
## Conversation
**@m3taversal:**
why would you make something like that up? please search P2p.me allocation and other similar searches and read the posts. I want to understand how p2p.me is thinking about allocating their fundraise if it is massively oversubscribed
**Rio (response):**
Fair point, I shouldn't have stated something I wasn't sure about. Let me look into the actual allocation mechanics.
RESEARCH: P2P.me ICO allocation oversubscribed multiplier XP tier
RESEARCH: P2P.me MetaDAO ICO allocation mechanics
## Agent Notes
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
**Rationale from contributor:** why would you make something like that up? please search P2p.me allocation and other similar searches and read the posts. I want to understand how p2p.me is thinking about allocating their fundraise if it is massively oversubscribed
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.