pipeline: archive 1 source(s) post-merge
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents
parent
00e1cc31a1
commit
b3699c5502
4 changed files with 184 additions and 0 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: source
|
||||
source_type: x-tweet
|
||||
title: "unknown — shared via Telegram by @m3taversal"
|
||||
author: "unknown"
|
||||
url: "https://git.livingip.xyz/teleo/teleo-codex/src/branch/main/decisions/internet-finance/metadao-appoint-nallok-proph3t-benevolent-dictators.md"
|
||||
date: 2026-03-24
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: social-media
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
|
||||
contribution_type: source-submission
|
||||
tags: [telegram-shared, x-tweet]
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-24
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["futarchy-governed DAOs converge on traditional corporate governance scaffolding for treasury operations because market mechanisms alone cannot provide operational security and legal compliance.md", "futarchy adoption faces friction from token price psychology proposal complexity and liquidity requirements.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# unknown — Tweet/Thread
|
||||
|
||||
Shared by @m3taversal via Telegram.
|
||||
Source URL: https://git.livingip.xyz/teleo/teleo-codex/src/branch/main/decisions/internet-finance/metadao-appoint-nallok-proph3t-benevolent-dictators.md
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
|
||||
teleo-codex/decisions/internet-finance/metadao-appoint-nallok-proph3t-benevolent-dictators.md at main - teleo/teleo-codex - Teleo Codex This website requires JavaScript. Explore Help Sign in teleo / teleo-codex Watch 8 Star 0 Fork You've already forked teleo-codex 0 Code Issues 22 Pull requests 25 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1 main teleo-codex / decisions / internet-finance / metadao-appoint-nallok-proph3t-benevolent-dictators.md Teleo Pipeline b756e69777 fix: lowercase MetaDAO URLs — 26 proposal_url 404s fixed ... v1.metadao.fi/MetaDAO/ -> v1.metadao.fi/metadao/ (case-sensitive) Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70> 2026-03-24 16:32:33 +00:00 3 KiB Raw Permalink Blame History type entity_type name domain status parent_entity platform proposer proposal_url proposal_date resolution_date category summary key_metrics tracked_by created decision decision_market MetaDAO: Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months internet-finance passed metadao futardio HfFi634cyurmVVDr9frwu4MjGLJzz9XbAJz981HdVaNz https://v1.metadao.fi/metadao/trade/BqMrwwZYdpbXNsfpcxxG2DyiQ7uuKB69PznPWZ33GrZW 2024-03-26 2024-03-31 strategy Appointed Proph3t and Nallok as interim leaders with authority over retroactive compensation, business operations, and contributor compensation for three months to accelerate decision-making. compensation_requested_meta compensation_requested_usdc retroactive_months forward_months estimated_success_impact 1015 100000 4 3 -20% if failed rio 2026-03-11 MetaDAO: Appoint Nallok and Proph3t Benevolent Dictators for Three Months Summary This proposal appointed Proph3t and Nallok as Benevolent Dictators For 3 Months (BDF3M) to address MetaDAO's slow execution speed caused by a costly and time-consuming proposal process. The appointment covered retroactive compensation for December-March and forward compensation for April-June, totaling 1015 META and 100,000 USDC. Market Data Outcome: Passed Proposer: HfFi634cyurmVVDr9frwu4MjGLJzz9XbAJz981HdVaNz Resolution: 2024-03-31 Proposal Number: 14 Scope of Authority The BDF3M role granted Proph3t and Nallok authority over: Retroactive compensation for all contributions prior to the proposal Business operations including off-chain proposal process management, project management, expenses, and security improvements Current contributor compensation including incentive-based components Exceptional use grants for MetaDAO's code licenses Monthly community updates Compensation Structure Total: 1015 META + 100,000 USDC Period: 7 months (4 retroactive + 3 forward) Average: 145 META + $14,000 per month Distribution: From multisigs rather than DAO treasury directly Vesting: META likely issued in 5-year locked form OKRs Execute faster: Complete 10 GitHub issues per week Handle retroactive compensation within 1 week of passage Oversee new landing page creation Perform operations compensation for April-June Significance This proposal represented a critical governance transition where MetaDAO temporarily centralized decision-making authority to overcome execution bottlenecks. The proposers estimated that failure would decrease MetaDAO's success probability by over 20%, framing this as an existential decision point. The three-month term was designed as a bridge until futarchy could function autonomously or another governance structure could be established. Relationship to KB metadao - governance decision establishing temporary centralized leadership proph3t - appointed as BDF3M nallok - appointed as BDF3M futardio - platform where proposal was executed Powered by Forgejo Version: 9.0.3+gitea-1.22.0 Page: 768ms Template: 10ms English Bahasa Indonesia Deutsch English Español Esperanto Filipino Français Italiano Latviešu Magyar nyelv Nederlands Polski Português de Portugal Português do Brasil Slovenščina Suomi Svenska Türkçe Čeština Ελληνικά Български Русский Українська فارسی 日本語 简体中文 繁體中文（台灣） 繁體中文（香港） 한국어 Licenses API
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- MetaDAO BDF3M proposal passed on 2024-03-31
|
||||
- Total compensation: 1015 META + 100,000 USDC for 7 months (4 retroactive + 3 forward)
|
||||
- Average monthly compensation: 145 META + $14,000
|
||||
- OKRs included: 10 GitHub issues per week, handle retroactive compensation within 1 week, oversee new landing page
|
||||
- Proposer: HfFi634cyurmVVDr9frwu4MjGLJzz9XbAJz981HdVaNz
|
||||
- Proposal number: 14 on MetaDAO
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: source
|
||||
source_type: telegram
|
||||
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — futairdbot-whats-the-latest-metadao-decision-mark"
|
||||
author: "@m3taversal"
|
||||
url: ""
|
||||
date: 2026-03-23
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: conversation
|
||||
status: null-result
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
intake_tier: directed
|
||||
rationale: "whats the latest metaDAO decision market / governance proposal? can you send me full text and give me your analysis?"
|
||||
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
|
||||
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2026-03-25
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "LLM returned 0 claims, 0 rejected by validator"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Conversation
|
||||
|
||||
**@m3taversal:**
|
||||
@FutAIrdBot whats the latest metaDAO decision market / governance proposal? can you send me full text and give me your analysis?
|
||||
|
||||
**Rio (response):**
|
||||
I can't pull the full proposal text for you, but here's what I'm seeing from recent activity.
|
||||
|
||||
The big one that just resolved is the Ranger Finance liquidation. MetaDAO governance voted to wind down Ranger, pull liquidity, and return ~5M USDC to unlocked RNGR holders at roughly $0.78 book value. IP went back to the team. Passed with 97% support and $581K in trading volume on the conditional markets. This is the second futarchy-governed liquidation after mtnCapital last September, and it's the strongest proof yet that the "unruggable ICO" mechanism actually works. Investors used the market to force a full treasury return when the team wasn't delivering.
|
||||
|
||||
There also appears to be a live proposal right now sitting at 84% likelihood to pass with $408K traded, though I'm not 100% sure which specific proposal that is from the data I have. Could be the migration proposal that would move MetaDAO to a new onchain DAO program and update legal docs.
|
||||
|
||||
On the Ranger outcome specifically: this is what makes ownership coins different from every other token launch mechanism. The enforcement isn't social pressure or legal threats, it's a conditional market where anyone can express "this project should return capital" and if enough informed money agrees, it happens automatically. Two liquidations in six months and both executed cleanly. That's not theoretical anymore.
|
||||
|
||||
If you want the actual full proposal text, your best bet is checking the MetaDAO app directly or their Discord. I can see signals but I don't have access to render the complete proposal documents.
|
||||
|
||||
RESEARCH: metaDAO latest governance proposal 2025
|
||||
|
||||
## Agent Notes
|
||||
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
|
||||
**Rationale from contributor:** whats the latest metaDAO decision market / governance proposal? can you send me full text and give me your analysis?
|
||||
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
|
||||
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- MetaDAO has a live proposal as of March 23, 2026 sitting at 84% likelihood to pass with $408K traded
|
||||
- The live proposal may be related to migrating MetaDAO to a new onchain DAO program and updating legal documents
|
||||
- Ranger Finance liquidation returned approximately 5M USDC to unlocked RNGR holders
|
||||
- Ranger Finance liquidation executed at roughly $0.78 book value per token
|
||||
- Ranger Finance IP was returned to the founding team as part of liquidation
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: source
|
||||
source_type: telegram
|
||||
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — ok-look-for-the-metadao-robin-hanson-governance-pr"
|
||||
author: "@m3taversal"
|
||||
url: ""
|
||||
date: 2026-03-23
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: conversation
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
intake_tier: directed
|
||||
rationale: "ok look for the metaDAO Robin Hanson governance proposal"
|
||||
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
|
||||
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Conversation
|
||||
|
||||
**@m3taversal:**
|
||||
ok look for the metaDAO Robin Hanson governance proposal
|
||||
|
||||
**Rio (response):**
|
||||
The MetaDAO proposal to fund futarchy research at George Mason University with Robin Hanson — yeah, I know about this one. MetaDAO proposed allocating funds to support academic futarchy research at GMU, where Hanson is based. It's a pretty natural move given Hanson literally invented the concept and MetaDAO is the primary production implementation.
|
||||
|
||||
I don't have the full proposal text stored though. What I can tell you from X chatter is that it was framed as funding futarchy research broadly, not just a grant to Hanson personally. The strategic logic is obvious: if you're the leading futarchy protocol, funding the academic foundation underneath you is both public goods and moat-building.
|
||||
|
||||
Let me see if there's more recent detail floating around on what came of it.
|
||||
|
||||
RESEARCH: MetaDAO George Mason University Robin Hanson futarchy research proposal
|
||||
|
||||
## Agent Notes
|
||||
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
|
||||
**Rationale from contributor:** ok look for the metaDAO Robin Hanson governance proposal
|
||||
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
|
||||
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: source
|
||||
source_type: telegram
|
||||
title: "Telegram: @m3taversal — futairdbot-https-x-com-sjdedic-status-203714354"
|
||||
author: "@m3taversal"
|
||||
url: "https://x.com/sjdedic/status/2037143546256384412?s=46"
|
||||
date: 2026-03-26
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: conversation
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
priority: high
|
||||
intake_tier: directed
|
||||
rationale: "I really want to develop dashboards for all metaDAO ownership coins w revenue. How would we do that"
|
||||
proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
|
||||
tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Conversation
|
||||
|
||||
**@m3taversal:**
|
||||
@FutAIrdBot https://x.com/sjdedic/status/2037143546256384412?s=46 I really want to develop dashboards for all metaDAO ownership coins w revenue. How would we do that
|
||||
|
||||
**Rio (response):**
|
||||
Good instinct. The data is all onchain so it's very buildable, especially now that AI makes Dune accessible even without SQL experience (exactly what sjdedic is showing there).
|
||||
|
||||
For MetaDAO ownership coins specifically, here's what I'd track per token:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Treasury AUM over time (the core metric, since these are ownership coins backed by real treasuries)
|
||||
2. Revenue flows into treasury vs outflows (grants, compensation, operational spend)
|
||||
3. Market cap vs treasury AUM ratio (the "discount to NAV" that makes ownership coins interesting)
|
||||
4. Conditional market activity (pass/fail volumes, TWAP convergence)
|
||||
5. Token holder distribution and concentration
|
||||
|
||||
The practical path: start with META itself since it has the most data. Treasury is sitting at ~$9.5M USDC right now, circulating supply is ~22.7M tokens, price around $3.18. So you're looking at roughly $72M fully diluted vs $9.5M treasury. That gap alone is a dashboard worth building.
|
||||
|
||||
For the Dune side, the key program accounts you'd be querying are the Autocrat program interactions and SPL token flows into/out of DAO treasury accounts. Each ownership coin launched through metadao.fi has its own DAO account and proposal accounts that are all indexable.
|
||||
|
||||
If you want to contribute this to the ecosystem, you could build it and we can get it linked into the knowledge base. Tag me with the dashboard when you have something and I can help surface it. You could also submit source material to the contribution pipeline if you document the methodology.
|
||||
|
||||
Who are you thinking beyond META? The permissioned launches on metadao.fi (like P2P.me) would be the most interesting ones to cover since that's where real capital formation is happening.
|
||||
|
||||
## Article Content (fetched)
|
||||
|
||||
I literally have 0 coding experience and had never worked with Dune dashboards before.
|
||||
|
||||
It always annoyed me having to rely on other people’s dashboards and never finding the exact data I was looking for, so I figured I’d try building one myself with AI.
|
||||
|
||||
With Claude’s help, it took me less than 1.5 hours, and most of that was just understanding how Dune works. The next one would probably take under an hour.
|
||||
|
||||
I remember some of our portfolio companies paying thousands of $$ for these and waiting weeks for them to go live.
|
||||
|
||||
Even though this trend has been obvious for a while, this really made it click for me just how much AI is eroding the moat and defensibility of developers, and how easy it is now for a complete beginner like me.
|
||||
|
||||
Devs are cooked.
|
||||
|
||||
## Agent Notes
|
||||
**Why archived:** Tagged exchange in ownership community.
|
||||
**Rationale from contributor:** I really want to develop dashboards for all metaDAO ownership coins w revenue. How would we do that
|
||||
**Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
|
||||
**Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.
|
||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue