diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/ownership coin treasuries should be actively managed through buybacks and token sales as continuous capital calibration not treated as static war chests.md b/domains/internet-finance/ownership coin treasuries should be actively managed through buybacks and token sales as continuous capital calibration not treated as static war chests.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..83e965e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/ownership coin treasuries should be actively managed through buybacks and token sales as continuous capital calibration not treated as static war chests.md	
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: internet-finance
+description: "The market cap-to-treasury multiple signals whether to expand or contract, making buybacks and additional token sales features of healthy ownership coins rather than signs of distress or extraction"
+confidence: experimental
+source: "rio, based on @m3taversal 'Fluid Capital Stacks' article (Feb 2026) and MetaDAO ecosystem buyback evidence"
+created: 2026-03-05
+depends_on:
+  - "ownership coin treasuries respond to market signals"
+  - "MetaDAO ecosystem projects executing buybacks (Paystream, Ranger, Turbine Cash)"
+  - "Fluid Capital Stacks article by @m3taversal"
+---
+
+# Ownership coin treasuries should be actively managed through buybacks and token sales as continuous capital calibration not treated as static war chests
+
+The default assumption in crypto is that treasury tokens should be held indefinitely — selling is extraction, buying back is cope. This claim argues the opposite: active treasury management through buybacks, liquidations, and additional token sales is the correct mechanism for ownership coins, because the market cap-to-treasury multiple provides a real-time signal for whether to expand or contract.
+
+The mechanism: when market cap trades at a high multiple to treasury value, the market is signaling confidence — this is the time to sell tokens and fund growth. When market cap compresses toward treasury value, the market is signaling doubt — this is the time to buy back tokens and concentrate ownership among believers. The treasury acts as a buffer that absorbs market information and translates it into capital allocation decisions.
+
+This is not financial engineering theater. Three MetaDAO ecosystem projects (Paystream Labs, Ranger Finance, Turbine Cash) executed buyback proposals in early 2026 via futarchy governance, providing the first real-world evidence of this model operating at protocol scale. Solomon Labs announced $SOLO buyback initiatives in Lab Notes 05 (Feb 2026). The pattern is emerging across the ecosystem, not isolated to one project.
+
+The deeper connection: since [[Living Capital vehicles are agentically managed SPACs with flexible structures that marshal capital toward mission-aligned investments and unwind when purpose is fulfilled]], fluid capital stacks are the operational mechanism for how that flexibility manifests day-to-day. A Living Capital vehicle that cannot buy back tokens when undervalued or sell tokens when overvalued is structurally worse at capital allocation than one that can. Since [[token economics replacing management fees and carried interest creates natural meritocracy in investment governance]], active treasury management is how the meritocratic signal — market price — actually feeds back into the system.
+
+## Evidence
+
+- @m3taversal "Fluid Capital Stacks" article (Feb 11 2026) — theoretical framework for continuous treasury management
+- @metaproph3t "Learning, Fast" (Feb 17 2026) — three buyback proposals executed across MetaDAO ecosystem
+- @oxranga Solomon Lab Notes 05 (Feb 25 2026) — $SOLO buyback initiatives announced
+
+## Challenges
+
+- Active treasury management gives insiders information asymmetry about upcoming buybacks/sells, potentially recreating the extraction problem it claims to solve
+- Buybacks can be value-destructive if executed at inflated prices — the mechanism depends on market cap-to-treasury being an accurate signal, which requires liquid markets
+- "Continuous calibration" may be indistinguishable from insider trading without robust disclosure mechanisms
+- Since [[futarchy-governed entities are structurally not securities because prediction market participation replaces the concentrated promoter effort that the Howey test requires]], active treasury management by a team could re-introduce the "efforts of others" prong that the structural argument depends on eliminating
+
+---
+
+Relevant Notes:
+- [[Living Capital vehicles are agentically managed SPACs with flexible structures that marshal capital toward mission-aligned investments and unwind when purpose is fulfilled]] — fluid capital stacks are the operational mechanism for this flexibility
+- [[token economics replacing management fees and carried interest creates natural meritocracy in investment governance]] — market price as the feedback signal for treasury action
+- [[futarchy-governed entities are structurally not securities because prediction market participation replaces the concentrated promoter effort that the Howey test requires]] — active treasury management may complicate this argument
+
+Topics:
+- [[internet finance and decision markets]]