diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-03-31-leo-campaign-stop-killer-robots-ai-weapons-stigmatization-trajectory.md b/inbox/queue/2026-03-31-leo-campaign-stop-killer-robots-ai-weapons-stigmatization-trajectory.md
index 4a52b6e5..7fd54066 100644
--- a/inbox/queue/2026-03-31-leo-campaign-stop-killer-robots-ai-weapons-stigmatization-trajectory.md
+++ b/inbox/queue/2026-03-31-leo-campaign-stop-killer-robots-ai-weapons-stigmatization-trajectory.md
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@ The ICBL was founded in 1992 and achieved the Ottawa Treaty in 1997 — five yea
 
 **KB connections:**
 - [[narratives are infrastructure not just communication because they coordinate action at civilizational scale]] — CS-KR IS the narrative infrastructure; the missing component is the triggering event that activates it
-- [[the meaning crisis is a narrative infrastructure failure not a personal psychological problem]] — the "who decides when AI kills" question is a narrative infrastructure problem at civilizational scale
+- the meaning crisis is a narrative infrastructure failure not a personal psychological problem — the "who decides when AI kills" question is a narrative infrastructure problem at civilizational scale
 - Ottawa Treaty analysis (today's first archive) — CS-KR has Component 1 (infrastructure) but lacks Components 2 and 3
 
 **Extraction hints:**
diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-03-31-leo-triggering-event-architecture-weapons-stigmatization-campaigns.md b/inbox/queue/2026-03-31-leo-triggering-event-architecture-weapons-stigmatization-campaigns.md
index 5fad28fa..42954a3c 100644
--- a/inbox/queue/2026-03-31-leo-triggering-event-architecture-weapons-stigmatization-campaigns.md
+++ b/inbox/queue/2026-03-31-leo-triggering-event-architecture-weapons-stigmatization-campaigns.md
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ The Princess Diana Angola visit succeeded because the ICBL had pre-built the nar
 - [[narratives are infrastructure not just communication because they coordinate action at civilizational scale]] — pre-event narrative infrastructure is load-bearing for whether the triggering event activates at scale
 - CS-KR analysis (today's second archive) — Component 1 assessment
 - Ottawa Treaty analysis (today's first archive) — Component 2 and 3 detail
-- [[the meaning crisis is a narrative infrastructure failure not a personal psychological problem]] — the AI weapons "meaning" gap (sci-fi vs. documented harm) is a narrative infrastructure problem
+- the meaning crisis is a narrative infrastructure failure not a personal psychological problem — the AI weapons "meaning" gap (sci-fi vs. documented harm) is a narrative infrastructure problem
 
 **Extraction hints:**
 1. STANDALONE CLAIM (Candidate 3 from research-2026-03-31.md): Triggering-event architecture as three-component sequential mechanism — infrastructure → triggering event → champion moment. Grand-strategy/mechanisms. Confidence: experimental (single strong case + CS-KR trajectory assessment; mechanism is clear but transfer is judgment).