extract: 2026-03-22-voyager-technologies-q4-fy2025-starlab-financials
Some checks are pending
Sync Graph Data to teleo-app / sync (push) Waiting to run
Some checks are pending
Sync Graph Data to teleo-app / sync (push) Waiting to run
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2d0f9c6d61
commit
b59512ba7f
4 changed files with 73 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -46,6 +46,12 @@ Starlab completed Commercial Critical Design Review (CCDR) with NASA in February
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
NASA awarded Axiom Mission 5 and Vast's first PAM in February 2026, demonstrating active government demand for commercial station services even before stations are operational. Vast's PAM award before Haven-1 launches shows NASA creating operational experience and revenue streams that reduce commercial station development risk.
|
NASA awarded Axiom Mission 5 and Vast's first PAM in February 2026, demonstrating active government demand for commercial station services even before stations are operational. Vast's PAM award before Haven-1 launches shows NASA creating operational experience and revenue streams that reduce commercial station development risk.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||||
|
*Source: [[2026-03-22-voyager-technologies-q4-fy2025-starlab-financials]] | Added: 2026-03-22*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Voyager Technologies completed Starlab's commercial Critical Design Review (CCDR) in 2025, marking 31 total milestones completed with $183.2M NASA cash received inception-to-date. The company maintains $704.7M liquidity (+15% sequential) specifically to bridge the design-to-manufacturing transition, demonstrating that commercial station developers are actively progressing through development gates with substantial capital reserves.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -43,6 +43,12 @@ U.S. DOE Isotope Program signed contract for 3 liters of lunar He-3 by April 202
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
NASA's PAM program structure has NASA purchasing crew consumables, cargo delivery, and storage from commercial providers (Vast, Axiom), while NASA sells cold sample return capability back to them. This bidirectional service exchange demonstrates government operating as customer rather than prime contractor.
|
NASA's PAM program structure has NASA purchasing crew consumables, cargo delivery, and storage from commercial providers (Vast, Axiom), while NASA sells cold sample return capability back to them. This bidirectional service exchange demonstrates government operating as customer rather than prime contractor.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
|
||||||
|
*Source: [[2026-03-22-voyager-technologies-q4-fy2025-starlab-financials]] | Added: 2026-03-22*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Voyager's Space Solutions revenue declined 36% YoY to $47.6M as 'NASA services contract wind-down' (ISS-related services) accelerates, while Starlab development (commercial station as service model) received $56M in milestone payments in 2025. This demonstrates the active transition from government-operated infrastructure to commercial service procurement in real-time.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Relevant Notes:
|
Relevant Notes:
|
||||||
- [[good management causes disruption because rational resource allocation systematically favors sustaining innovation over disruptive opportunities]] — legacy primes rationally optimize for existing procurement relationships while commercial-first competitors redefine the game
|
- [[good management causes disruption because rational resource allocation systematically favors sustaining innovation over disruptive opportunities]] — legacy primes rationally optimize for existing procurement relationships while commercial-first competitors redefine the game
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"rejected_claims": [
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"filename": "commercial-station-developers-require-phase-2-anchor-funding-to-bridge-design-to-manufacturing-gap.md",
|
||||||
|
"issues": [
|
||||||
|
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||||
|
]
|
||||||
|
},
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
"filename": "defense-revenue-cross-subsidy-creates-commercial-station-resilience-independent-of-nasa-timing.md",
|
||||||
|
"issues": [
|
||||||
|
"missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||||
|
]
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
],
|
||||||
|
"validation_stats": {
|
||||||
|
"total": 2,
|
||||||
|
"kept": 0,
|
||||||
|
"fixed": 6,
|
||||||
|
"rejected": 2,
|
||||||
|
"fixes_applied": [
|
||||||
|
"commercial-station-developers-require-phase-2-anchor-funding-to-bridge-design-to-manufacturing-gap.md:set_created:2026-03-22",
|
||||||
|
"commercial-station-developers-require-phase-2-anchor-funding-to-bridge-design-to-manufacturing-gap.md:stripped_wiki_link:commercial space stations are the next infrastructure bet as",
|
||||||
|
"commercial-station-developers-require-phase-2-anchor-funding-to-bridge-design-to-manufacturing-gap.md:stripped_wiki_link:governments are transitioning from space system builders to ",
|
||||||
|
"defense-revenue-cross-subsidy-creates-commercial-station-resilience-independent-of-nasa-timing.md:set_created:2026-03-22",
|
||||||
|
"defense-revenue-cross-subsidy-creates-commercial-station-resilience-independent-of-nasa-timing.md:stripped_wiki_link:commercial space stations are the next infrastructure bet as",
|
||||||
|
"defense-revenue-cross-subsidy-creates-commercial-station-resilience-independent-of-nasa-timing.md:stripped_wiki_link:defense spending is the new catalyst for space investment wi"
|
||||||
|
],
|
||||||
|
"rejections": [
|
||||||
|
"commercial-station-developers-require-phase-2-anchor-funding-to-bridge-design-to-manufacturing-gap.md:missing_attribution_extractor",
|
||||||
|
"defense-revenue-cross-subsidy-creates-commercial-station-resilience-independent-of-nasa-timing.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
|
||||||
|
]
|
||||||
|
},
|
||||||
|
"model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
|
||||||
|
"date": "2026-03-22"
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2026-03-01
|
||||||
domain: space-development
|
domain: space-development
|
||||||
secondary_domains: []
|
secondary_domains: []
|
||||||
format: thread
|
format: thread
|
||||||
status: unprocessed
|
status: enrichment
|
||||||
priority: medium
|
priority: medium
|
||||||
tags: [Starlab, Voyager-Technologies, commercial-station, financials, NASA-milestones, capital-structure]
|
tags: [Starlab, Voyager-Technologies, commercial-station, financials, NASA-milestones, capital-structure]
|
||||||
|
processed_by: astra
|
||||||
|
processed_date: 2026-03-22
|
||||||
|
enrichments_applied: ["commercial space stations are the next infrastructure bet as ISS retirement creates a void that 4 companies are racing to fill by 2030.md", "governments are transitioning from space system builders to space service buyers which structurally advantages nimble commercial providers.md"]
|
||||||
|
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||||
---
|
---
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Content
|
## Content
|
||||||
|
|
@ -59,3 +63,23 @@ tags: [Starlab, Voyager-Technologies, commercial-station, financials, NASA-miles
|
||||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: Post-threshold constraint claims about capital formation
|
PRIMARY CONNECTION: Post-threshold constraint claims about capital formation
|
||||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Best available financial data on commercial station development economics — quantifies the capital structure and Phase 2 dependency
|
WHY ARCHIVED: Best available financial data on commercial station development economics — quantifies the capital structure and Phase 2 dependency
|
||||||
EXTRACTION HINT: The defense cross-subsidy insight is novel — Starlab may be more resilient than Orbital Reef because Voyager has a profitable defense business. This is a structural advantage not visible in NASA-funding comparisons alone.
|
EXTRACTION HINT: The defense cross-subsidy insight is novel — Starlab may be more resilient than Orbital Reef because Voyager has a profitable defense business. This is a structural advantage not visible in NASA-funding comparisons alone.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Key Facts
|
||||||
|
- Voyager Technologies FY2025 revenue: $166.4M (+15% YoY)
|
||||||
|
- Voyager Q4 2025 revenue: $46.7M (+24% YoY)
|
||||||
|
- Voyager year-end liquidity (12/31/25): $704.7M (+15% sequential quarterly increase)
|
||||||
|
- Voyager total backlog (12/31/25): $265.6M (+33% YoY)
|
||||||
|
- Voyager funded backlog: $146.1M
|
||||||
|
- Voyager FY2025 net loss: $(116.1)M
|
||||||
|
- Voyager Q4 2025 net loss: $(30.2)M
|
||||||
|
- Voyager FY2025 adjusted EBITDA: $(69.9)M
|
||||||
|
- Voyager Defense & National Security segment FY2025: $123.0M (+59% YoY)
|
||||||
|
- Voyager Defense & National Security Q4 2025: $35.7M (+63% YoY)
|
||||||
|
- Voyager Space Solutions segment FY2025: $47.6M (-36% YoY)
|
||||||
|
- Voyager Space Solutions Q4 2025: $12.5M (-29% YoY)
|
||||||
|
- Starlab 2025 NASA milestone cash: $56.0M
|
||||||
|
- Starlab inception-to-date milestone cash: $183.2M
|
||||||
|
- Starlab milestones completed: 31 total, 10 in 2025, 4 in Q4 2025
|
||||||
|
- Starlab Phase 1 total funding: $217.5M NASA + $15M Texas Space Commission + $40B financing facility
|
||||||
|
- Voyager 2026 revenue guidance: $225-255M (+35-53% projected growth)
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue