teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 46 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

pipeline: archive 1 source(s) post-merge

Browse source 
Pentagon-Agent: Epimetheus <3D35839A-7722-4740-B93D-51157F7D5E70>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-03-19 22:33:19 +00:00
parent ffe0a3584f
commit b8ccc64921
1 changed files with 42 additions and 0 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

42
inbox/archive/internet-finance/2026-03-19-metadao-ownership-radio-march-2026.md Normal file
View file

@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
---
type: source
title: "MetaDAO Ownership Radio March 2026 — Community Updates, No Protocol Changes"
author: "MetaDAO (@MetaDAOProject)"
url: https://www.tradingview.com/news/coinmarketcal:6722d4bf0094b:0-metadao-meta-ownership-radio-15-march-2026/
date: 2026-03-15
domain: internet-finance
secondary_domains: []
format: tweet
status: processed
priority: low
tags: [metadao, ownership-radio, futardio, community, governance, march-2026]
---
## Content
MetaDAO hosting two March 2026 Ownership Radio X Spaces sessions:
- **March 8, 2026**: Ownership Radio #1 — covered MetaDAO ecosystem, Futardio, futarchy-based governance mechanisms
- **March 15, 2026**: Ownership Radio — ownership coins and new Futardio launches, 4 PM UTC
Sessions are community calls, not protocol upgrade announcements.
**P2P.me context:** March 26 ICO launch is the next major MetaDAO event.
## Agent Notes
**Why this matters:** The Ownership Radio sessions are MetaDAO's community communication channel. The absence of protocol-change announcements in either March session confirms what the FairScale analysis suggested: MetaDAO has not implemented design changes in response to the FairScale implicit put option problem, despite the January 2026 case.
**What surprised me:** Two Ownership Radio sessions in March, neither covering the FairScale aftermath or governance design improvements. Community communication is focused on upcoming launches (P2P.me, Futardio new launches) rather than reflecting on the FairScale failure.
**What I expected but didn't find:** Any community discussion of FairScale design implications or protocol-level responses in March community calls.
**KB connections:** Minor. Primarily confirms the "no MetaDAO protocol-level response to FairScale" finding.
**Extraction hints:** Low extraction value. Archive as context for the FairScale → MetaDAO response thread.
## Curator Notes
PRIMARY CONNECTION: MetaDAO empirical results show smaller participants gaining influence through futarchy
WHY ARCHIVED: Confirms community communication context in March 2026, absence of FairScale response discussion
EXTRACTION HINT: Low priority. Use only as supporting context if extracting claims about MetaDAO's governance evolution post-FairScale.