auto-fix: strip 6 broken wiki links

Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.

inbox/queue/2026-05-04-hollywoodreporter-obsidian-studio-ai-filmmaking-imagine.md

@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ intake_tier: research-task
 **KB connections:**
 - [[Hollywood talent will embrace AI because narrowing creative paths within the studio system leave few alternatives]] — Obsidian Studio is evidence for this claim at the infrastructure level. The studio is founded by directors who chose to build with AI rather than against it.
 - [[GenAI adoption in entertainment will be gated by consumer acceptance not technology capability]] — Obsidian's "if it's AI-detectable, you've failed" standard IS the consumer acceptance gate. The strategy is invisible AI.
-- [[five factors determine the speed and extent of disruption]] — Institutional infrastructure formation (Obsidian + Imagine + AWS) is a speed factor: it accelerates adoption by reducing the friction of individual productions having to figure out AI workflows from scratch.
+- five factors determine the speed and extent of disruption — Institutional infrastructure formation (Obsidian + Imagine + AWS) is a speed factor: it accelerates adoption by reducing the friction of individual productions having to figure out AI workflows from scratch.
 
 **Extraction hints:**
 1. PRIMARY: "Production services companies purpose-built for AI filmmaking are emerging with institutional backing (Obsidian Studio + Imagine Entertainment + AWS) — indicating AI production has crossed from experimentation to infrastructure formation, a disruption speed indicator."

inbox/queue/2026-05-04-indiewire-project-hail-mary-oppenheimer-pattern.md

@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ intake_tier: research-task
 
 **KB connections:**
 - [[master narrative crisis is a design window not a catastrophe because the interval between constellations is when deliberate narrative architecture has maximum leverage]] — this is the market test. If the design window is real, earnest civilizational sci-fi should find audiences. $613.4M says yes.
-- [[The meaning crisis is a narrative infrastructure failure not a personal psychological problem]] — Project Hail Mary is about international cooperative civilization-preservation. It's direct evidence that audiences have appetite for this framing.
+- The meaning crisis is a narrative infrastructure failure not a personal psychological problem — Project Hail Mary is about international cooperative civilization-preservation. It's direct evidence that audiences have appetite for this framing.
 - [[consumer definition of quality is fluid and revealed through preference not fixed by production value]] — audiences revealed their preference: earnest civilizational > most franchise product
 
 **Extraction hints:**

inbox/queue/2026-05-04-variety-megalopolis-earnest-civilizational-flop.md

@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ intake_tier: research-task
 **What I expected but didn't find:** A case where audiences rejected the civilizational concept itself. Instead, the evidence shows concept acceptance (audiences saw it) followed by execution rejection (D+ word of mouth). This is exactly the pattern that would make Belief 4 refineable rather than falsified.
 
 **KB connections:**
-- [[master narrative crisis is a design window not a catastrophe]] — Megalopolis is evidence that the window is execution-gated. The film's vision (utopia, civilizational renewal) is precisely what the "design window" claim predicts has audience appetite. But D+ CinemaScore means the execution killed the transmission.
+- master narrative crisis is a design window not a catastrophe — Megalopolis is evidence that the window is execution-gated. The film's vision (utopia, civilizational renewal) is precisely what the "design window" claim predicts has audience appetite. But D+ CinemaScore means the execution killed the transmission.
 - [[consumer definition of quality is fluid and revealed through preference not fixed by production value]] — Megalopolis was made by an A-list director with auteur prestige. Quality wasn't production value (budget was $136M). Quality was narrative execution — which audiences rejected.
 
 **Extraction hints:**

inbox/queue/2026-05-04-variety-pixar-elio-worst-opening-animated-earnest-scifi.md

@@ -40,8 +40,8 @@ intake_tier: research-task
 **What I expected but didn't find:** Any evidence that the CONCEPT of earnest optimistic sci-fi drove the underperformance. The Variety headline attributes failure to "Pixar can't launch original films" — a franchise fatigue/Pixar-brand problem, not an earnest-sci-fi problem.
 
 **KB connections:**
-- [[creator and corporate media economies are zero-sum because total media time is stagnant]] — Pixar is in the corporate media category; its originals are competing with a creator economy that has trained audiences to seek content through different channels.
+- creator and corporate media economies are zero-sum because total media time is stagnant — Pixar is in the corporate media category; its originals are competing with a creator economy that has trained audiences to seek content through different channels.
-- [[information cascades create power law distributions in culture because consumers use popularity as a quality signal]] — Elio had weak opening signal → Pixar brand didn't overcome it → cascade reinforced itself.
+- information cascades create power law distributions in culture because consumers use popularity as a quality signal — Elio had weak opening signal → Pixar brand didn't overcome it → cascade reinforced itself.
 
 **Extraction hints:**
 1. Elio is useful as a SCOPE qualifier for the "earnest sci-fi design window" thesis: the window appears more reliably open for live-action adult sci-fi than for animated family sci-fi where brand fatigue (Pixar originals) is the primary headwind.

inbox/queue/2026-05-04-variety-wbd-q4-2025-132m-subscribers-reporting-end.md

@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ intake_tier: research-task
 
 **KB connections:**
 - [[proxy inertia is the most reliable predictor of incumbent failure because current profitability rationally discourages pursuit of viable futures]] — WBD's subscriber growth is "current profitability" that rationally discourages pursuing community-creation paths. The IP accumulation trajectory is the rational response to their cost structure and debt load.
-- [[what matters in industry transitions is the slope not the trigger]] — WBD's 131.6M subscribers is impressive; the slope (3.6M QoQ, internationally driven) is the key metric. If international expansion plateaus, the slope changes fast.
+- what matters in industry transitions is the slope not the trigger — WBD's 131.6M subscribers is impressive; the slope (3.6M QoQ, internationally driven) is the key metric. If international expansion plateaus, the slope changes fast.
 - [[streaming churn may be permanently uneconomic because maintenance marketing consumes up to half of average revenue per user]] — WBD isn't disclosing ARPU or churn; stopping subscriber reporting is partly to avoid scrutiny of these metrics.
 
 **Extraction hints:**