auto-fix: strip 4 broken wiki links
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
This commit is contained in:
parent
ec92a439eb
commit
babe869c33
3 changed files with 4 additions and 4 deletions
|
|
@ -36,4 +36,4 @@ NFA.space targets physical art under $500 as RWA tokenization opportunity, citin
|
|||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[domains/internet-finance/_map]]
|
||||
- domains/internet-finance/_map
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -34,13 +34,13 @@ Dean's List DAO's fee increase proposal included switching quote token from mSOL
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (extend)
|
||||
*Source: [[2024-11-25-futardio-proposal-launch-a-boost-for-hnt-ore]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
|
||||
*Source: 2024-11-25-futardio-proposal-launch-a-boost-for-hnt-ore | Added: 2026-03-16*
|
||||
|
||||
The HNT-ORE boost proposal frames strategic partnership value through liquidity network effects and brand positioning ('flagship DePIN project', 'competitive unit of account for real world assets'). Markets must price whether Helium association increases ORE's perceived legitimacy and network depth, demonstrating futarchy's ability to evaluate partnership proposals with significant intangible components.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (confirm)
|
||||
*Source: [[2024-12-02-futardio-proposal-approve-deans-list-treasury-management]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
|
||||
*Source: 2024-12-02-futardio-proposal-approve-deans-list-treasury-management | Added: 2026-03-16*
|
||||
|
||||
Dean's List DAO treasury de-risking proposal passed with market pricing showing 5-20% FDV increase ($500k to $525k-$600k) based on financial stability perception. The proposal explicitly modeled how converting volatile assets to stablecoins would impact market confidence and token valuation, demonstrating futarchy markets can price operational stability as a token price input.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ Cloak raised only $1,455 against a $300,000 target (0.5% of target), entering re
|
|||
|
||||
|
||||
### Additional Evidence (challenge)
|
||||
*Source: [[2026-03-05-futardio-launch-phonon-studio-ai]] | Added: 2026-03-16*
|
||||
*Source: 2026-03-05-futardio-launch-phonon-studio-ai | Added: 2026-03-16*
|
||||
|
||||
Phonon Studio AI launch failed to reach its $88,888 target and entered refunding status, demonstrating that not all futarchy-governed raises succeed. The project had demonstrable traction (live product, 1000+ songs generated, functional token mechanics) but still failed to attract sufficient capital, suggesting futarchy capital formation success is not uniform across project types or market conditions.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue