diff --git a/entities/internet-finance/futardio.md b/entities/internet-finance/futardio.md index 076b30ed..d8849d6a 100644 --- a/entities/internet-finance/futardio.md +++ b/entities/internet-finance/futardio.md @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ MetaDAO's token launch platform. Implements "unruggable ICOs" — permissionless - **2024-08-28** — MetaDAO proposal to develop futardio as memecoin launchpad with futarchy governance failed. Proposal would have allocated $100k grant over 6 months to development team. Key features: percentage of each new token supply allocated to futarchy DAO, points-to-token conversion within 180 days, revenue distribution to $FUTA holders, immutable deployment on IPFS/Arweave. Proposal rejected by market, suggesting reputational risks outweighed adoption benefits. - **2025-11-14** — Solomon launch: $8M raised (12.9x oversubscribed, $102.9M committed) for composable yield-bearing stablecoin - **2026-02-03** — Hurupay fundraise launched targeting $3M, closed Feb 7 at $2M (67% of target) in refunding status +- **2026-03-05** — Seyf AI-native wallet launch: raised $200 against $300,000 target, refunded (99.93% shortfall) +- **2026-03-06** — LobsterFutarchy launch raised $1,183 against $500,000 target, closed in refunding status after one day ## Competitive Position - **Unique mechanism**: Only launch platform with futarchy-governed accountability and treasury return guarantees - **vs pump.fun**: pump.fun is memecoin launch (zero accountability, pure speculation). Futardio is ownership coin launch (futarchy governance, treasury enforcement). Different categories despite both being "launch platforms." diff --git a/entities/internet-finance/mycorealms.md b/entities/internet-finance/mycorealms.md index 7b2c7b16..6995b6cc 100644 --- a/entities/internet-finance/mycorealms.md +++ b/entities/internet-finance/mycorealms.md @@ -38,6 +38,7 @@ The team includes crypticmeta (Solana/Bitcoin developer, previously built Ordina - **2026-03-04** — Fundraise closed in refunding status (did not reach $200K minimum) - **2026-01-01** — Launched $125,000 USDC raise on Futardio with 72-hour window. Token supply: 15.9M max (10M ICO, 2.9M liquidity, 3M team). Monthly allowance: $10,000. First CAPEX proposal: $50K for 3 growing rooms, accommodation, DG set. Team: crypticmeta (Solana/Bitcoin dev, OrdinalNovus $30M volume) + Ram (5+ years mushroom production). Performance-based team vesting: 5 tranches at 2x/4x/8x/16x/32x ICO price via 3-month TWAP, 18-month minimum cliff. All operations published to Arweave for transparency. +- **2026-03-11** — Launched $125K futarchy-governed fundraise on Futardio for mushroom farm infrastructure. Token supply: 15.9M max (12.9M circulating), with 10M ICO tokens (62.9%), 2.9M liquidity (18.2%), 3M team performance package (18.9%). Team tokens locked with 2x/4x/8x/16x/32x price triggers, 18-month cliff, 3-month TWAP evaluation. Monthly treasury allowance: $10K. First proposal post-raise: $50K CAPEX for 3 growing rooms, accommodation, DG set. 72-hour raise window with full refunds if target not met. ## Governance Structure Treasury control enforced through: diff --git a/entities/internet-finance/omnipair.md b/entities/internet-finance/omnipair.md index 6b0cb27a..6f887a75 100644 --- a/entities/internet-finance/omnipair.md +++ b/entities/internet-finance/omnipair.md @@ -53,6 +53,7 @@ Combined AMM + lending protocol on Solana — swapping and borrowing in the same - **Pending** — LP experience improvements, combined APY display (swap + interest), off-chain watchers for bad debt monitoring - **2026-01-00** — Performance update: reached 16x peak return, currently trading at ~5x from ICO price +- **2026-03-09** — Jupiter SDK integration ready and imminent; identified as highest-impact near-term catalyst. Team of 6, $2-3M market cap, $250-300K TVL. Core challenge: chicken-and-egg liquidity bootstrapping between LPs (need borrow demand) and borrowers (need LP depth). Rate controller mechanism adjusts borrow costs dynamically based on utilization. 1% withdrawal fee implemented for security. Positioned as 'only game in town' for metaDAO ecosystem leverage until Drift enters (if META hits $1B). ## Competitive Position - **"Only game in town"** for leverage on MetaDAO ecosystem tokens currently - Rakka argues mathematically: same AMM + aggregator integration + borrow rate surplus = must yield more than Raydium for equivalent pools