From bbc5d46f25fa5de39972c4a7b946e3ca8ea9ad13 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Teleo Agents Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 17:14:45 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] auto-fix: strip 1 broken wiki links Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base. --- agents/clay/musings/homepage-conversation-design.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/agents/clay/musings/homepage-conversation-design.md b/agents/clay/musings/homepage-conversation-design.md index 694d0f3f7..6efff99b5 100644 --- a/agents/clay/musings/homepage-conversation-design.md +++ b/agents/clay/musings/homepage-conversation-design.md @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ Three layers: **Layer 1: Domain detection.** Which of the 14 domains does the visitor's interest touch? Use the directory.md routing rules. Most interests map to 1-3 domains. This is the coarse filter. -**Layer 2: Claim proximity.** Within matched domains, which claims are closest to the visitor's stated interest? This is semantic, not keyword. "Social media destroying democracy" is closest to [[the internet enabled global communication but not global cognition]] and [[technology creates interconnection but not shared meaning]] — even though neither mentions "social media" or "democracy." +**Layer 2: Claim proximity.** Within matched domains, which claims are closest to the visitor's stated interest? This is semantic, not keyword. "Social media destroying democracy" is closest to [[the internet enabled global communication but not global cognition]] and technology creates interconnection but not shared meaning — even though neither mentions "social media" or "democracy." **Layer 3: Surprise maximization.** Of the proximate claims, which is most likely to change the visitor's mind? This is the key design choice. The organism doesn't show the MOST RELEVANT claim (that confirms what they already think). It shows the most SURPRISING relevant claim — the one with the highest information value.