diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/democratic-war-bets-enforcement-demand-creates-cftc-offshore-jurisdiction-dilemma.md b/domains/internet-finance/democratic-war-bets-enforcement-demand-creates-cftc-offshore-jurisdiction-dilemma.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e3624767b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/democratic-war-bets-enforcement-demand-creates-cftc-offshore-jurisdiction-dilemma.md
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: internet-finance
+description: Congressional letter demanding CFTC enforce existing terrorism/war/assassination contract prohibitions on offshore platforms forces CFTC to either claim new offshore authority or appear to selectively enforce rules
+confidence: experimental
+source: House Democrats letter to CFTC Chair Selig, April 7 2026
+created: 2026-04-12
+title: Democratic demand for CFTC enforcement of existing war-bet rules creates a regulatory dilemma where enforcing expands offshore jurisdiction while refusing creates political ammunition
+agent: rio
+scope: structural
+sourcer: CNBC
+related_claims: ["[[congressional-insider-trading-legislation-for-prediction-markets-treats-them-as-financial-instruments-not-gambling-strengthening-dcm-regulatory-legitimacy]]"]
+---
+
+# Democratic demand for CFTC enforcement of existing war-bet rules creates a regulatory dilemma where enforcing expands offshore jurisdiction while refusing creates political ammunition
+
+Seven House Democrats led by Reps. Moulton and McGovern sent a letter to CFTC Chair Selig demanding enforcement of existing CFTC rules prohibiting terrorism, assassination, and war event contracts against offshore prediction markets like Polymarket. The letter cited suspicious trading before Venezuela intervention, Iran attacks, and a Polymarket contract on whether downed F-15E pilots would be rescued. The strategic significance is the framing: Democrats argue CFTC already has authority under existing rules, requiring no new legislation. This creates a forced choice for the CFTC. If Selig agrees and enforces, it establishes precedent for CFTC jurisdiction over offshore platforms—a major expansion of regulatory reach that prediction market advocates might actually want for legitimacy. If Selig declines, Democrats gain political ammunition against the administration's 'CFTC has exclusive jurisdiction' position, potentially opening the door for other agencies (SEC, state regulators) to claim authority. The 'existing authority' framing makes refusal politically costly because it appears as selective non-enforcement rather than jurisdictional limitation. The timing is notable: Polymarket removed the F-15 pilot market and acknowledged the lapse the same week, suggesting self-policing in anticipation of pressure.
diff --git a/entities/internet-finance/michael-selig.md b/entities/internet-finance/michael-selig.md
index 81188578f..c1a9ef57c 100644
--- a/entities/internet-finance/michael-selig.md
+++ b/entities/internet-finance/michael-selig.md
@@ -1,18 +1,13 @@
 # Michael Selig
 
-**Role:** CFTC Chair  
-**Status:** Active  
-**Appointed:** 2025 (approximate)
+**Type:** person  
+**Status:** active  
+**Domain:** internet-finance
 
 ## Overview
 
-Michael Selig serves as Chair of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission under the Trump administration. His tenure has been marked by aggressive assertion of federal jurisdiction over prediction markets.
+CFTC Chair as of April 2026.
 
 ## Timeline
 
-- **2025** — At confirmation hearing, stated CFTC should defer to courts on core legal question of prediction market jurisdiction
-- **2026-04-02** — Shifted position to actively sue Arizona, Connecticut, and Illinois, asserting exclusive federal jurisdiction over prediction markets
-
-## Significance
-
-Selig's shift from judicial deference to offensive litigation represents executive branch willingness to create favorable precedent through coordinated multi-state lawsuits rather than wait for case-law to develop organically.
\ No newline at end of file
+- **2026-04-07** — Received letter from seven House Democrats demanding CFTC enforce existing rules prohibiting terrorism, assassination, and war event contracts on offshore prediction markets; response requested by April 15, 2026
\ No newline at end of file