diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-03-30-tg-claim-m3taversal-top-10-wallets-in-metadao-umbra-hold-approximately-5-3m-of.md b/inbox/queue/2026-03-30-tg-claim-m3taversal-top-10-wallets-in-metadao-umbra-hold-approximately-5-3m-of.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..57342d4d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/inbox/queue/2026-03-30-tg-claim-m3taversal-top-10-wallets-in-metadao-umbra-hold-approximately-5-3m-of.md
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+type: source
+source_type: telegram-claim
+title: "Claim from @m3taversal — Top 10 wallets in MetaDAO/UMBRA hold approximately $5.3M of $6.6M total committe"
+author: "@m3taversal"
+date: 2026-03-30
+domain: internet-finance
+format: claim-draft
+status: unprocessed
+proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
+contribution_type: claim-proposal
+tags: [telegram-claim, inline-claim]
+---
+
+# Draft Claim: Top 10 wallets in MetaDAO/UMBRA hold approximately $5.3M of $6.6M total committed capital, representing ~80% concentration with major institutional backers including Multicoin
+
+Contributed by @m3taversal in Telegram chat.
+Flagged by Rio as a specific, disagreeable assertion worth extracting.
+
+## Verbatim User Message
+
+But the polymarket stuff did raise a few judgement questions. Funds have long mandates. These are big players like multicoin, other major VCs, you should have in your records the 5 or so different VCs or major investors that have publicly supported a launch i a big way. the top ten wallets represent like $5.3m of the $6.6m contributed to date
+
+## Proposed Claim
+
+Top 10 wallets in MetaDAO/UMBRA hold approximately $5.3M of $6.6M total committed capital, representing ~80% concentration with major institutional backers including Multicoin