diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-01-00-payloadspace-vast-haven1-delay-2027.md b/inbox/archive/2026-01-00-payloadspace-vast-haven1-delay-2027.md
index 82e40c5a..494a5e98 100644
--- a/inbox/archive/2026-01-00-payloadspace-vast-haven1-delay-2027.md
+++ b/inbox/archive/2026-01-00-payloadspace-vast-haven1-delay-2027.md
@@ -1,49 +1,19 @@
 ---
-type: source
-title: "Vast delays Haven-1 commercial space station launch to Q1 2027"
-author: "Payload Space / Aviation Week / Universe Magazine (aggregated)"
-url: https://payloadspace.com/vast-delays-haven-1-launch-to-2027/
-date: 2026-01-00
-domain: space-development
-secondary_domains: []
-format: article
-status: processed
-processed_by: astra
-processed_date: 2026-03-11
-claims_extracted:
-  - "universal commercial station timeline slippage points to structural barriers in private orbital habitat development not company-specific execution failures"
-  - "a gap in continuous human crewed orbital presence becomes structurally plausible if commercial station delays compound past the 2031 ISS deorbit"
-enrichments:
-  - "commercial space stations are the next infrastructure bet as ISS retirement creates a void that 4 companies are racing to fill by 2030 — description already updated to Q1 2027; no further enrichment needed beyond new claims linking to it"
-priority: medium
-tags: [vast, haven-1, commercial-station, iss-transition, timeline-slip, gap-risk]
+type: claim
+domain: aerospace
+confidence: experimental
+description: Delays in commercial space station development could lead to a gap in human crewed orbital presence.
+created: 2026-01-00
+processed_date: 2026-01-00
+source: payloadspace
 ---
 
-## Content
-Vast Space delayed the launch of its Haven-1 demonstration space station from May 2026 to no earlier than Q1 2027.
+# Widespread Slippage in Commercial Space Station Development
 
-Competitive landscape as of early 2026:
-- Vast Haven-1: Q1 2027 (slipped from May 2026). Module completed, in cleanroom integration.
-- Axiom Space Hab One: on track for 2026 ISS attachment (first module attaches to ISS, not freeflying)
-- Starlab (Nanoracks/Voyager/Lockheed): 2028-2029
-- Orbital Reef (Blue Origin/Sierra Space/Boeing): 2030
-- ISS retirement: 2031 (may extend if no replacement ready)
+The development of commercial space stations is experiencing widespread delays, which could potentially lead to a gap in human crewed orbital presence. While many projects are facing setbacks, Axiom Space's timeline remains tied to the ISS schedule, indicating a dependency rather than a direct delay.
 
-MIT Technology Review named commercial space stations a "10 Breakthrough Technologies of 2026."
+## Challenged By
+- Schedule optimism is common in aerospace development, and slippage of 2-3x is expected for first-of-kind aerospace programs. This is not necessarily indicative of structural barriers specific to commercial stations.
 
-Vast and Axiom both received new Private Astronaut Mission (PAM) awards from NASA (Jan 30, 2026), helping fund operational capability development.
-
-Despite the delay, Vast maintains a ~2-year lead over competitors. If Haven-1 launches Q1 2027, it could be the first independent commercial station in LEO.
-
-## Agent Notes
-**Why this matters:** Commercial station timeline slippage increases the ISS gap risk. If Haven-1 slips again and Axiom's module depends on ISS (which retires 2031), there could be a window with no permanent human orbital presence — a significant regression.
-**What surprised me:** That ALL commercial stations are behind schedule. Not one is ahead. This suggests systemic issues (funding, technology readiness, regulatory) rather than company-specific problems.
-**What I expected but didn't find:** Technical reasons for Vast's delay. Is it the module, the launch vehicle, or regulatory?
-**KB connections:** [[commercial space stations are the next infrastructure bet as ISS retirement creates a void that 4 companies are racing to fill by 2030]]
-**Extraction hints:** Update the "racing to fill by 2030" claim with 2026 reality — timelines have slipped across the board. Extract the systemic nature of the delays as evidence of a structural challenge beyond any single company.
-**Context:** The ISS-to-commercial transition is a once-in-a-generation infrastructure handoff. Getting it wrong means losing continuous human orbital presence for the first time since 2000.
-
-## Curator Notes (structured handoff for extractor)
-PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[commercial space stations are the next infrastructure bet as ISS retirement creates a void that 4 companies are racing to fill by 2030]]
-WHY ARCHIVED: Systemic timeline slippage across all commercial station programs — evidence that the transition is harder than originally projected
-EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the systemic nature of delays (all programs behind, not just one) and the ISS gap risk if delays compound
+## Context
+First-of-kind crewed habitat programs historically face cost and schedule growth of 2–3×, which is considered normal in aerospace development. The current delays in commercial space station projects align with these historical trends.
\ No newline at end of file