diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-03-23-telegram-m3taversal-glad-your-able-to-actually-read-the-article-this-t.md b/inbox/queue/2026-03-23-telegram-m3taversal-glad-your-able-to-actually-read-the-article-this-t.md
index 44bb93ac..6d72a024 100644
--- a/inbox/queue/2026-03-23-telegram-m3taversal-glad-your-able-to-actually-read-the-article-this-t.md
+++ b/inbox/queue/2026-03-23-telegram-m3taversal-glad-your-able-to-actually-read-the-article-this-t.md
@@ -7,12 +7,16 @@ url: ""
 date: 2026-03-23
 domain: internet-finance
 format: conversation
-status: unprocessed
+status: null-result
 priority: high
 intake_tier: directed
 rationale: "glad your able to actually read the article this time"
 proposed_by: "@m3taversal"
 tags: [telegram, ownership-community]
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-03-23
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
+extraction_notes: "LLM returned 0 claims, 0 rejected by validator"
 ---
 
 ## Conversation
@@ -28,3 +32,9 @@ ha, fair. yeah I couldn't see the linked content last time and should've just sa
 **Rationale from contributor:** glad your able to actually read the article this time
 **Intake tier:** directed — fast-tracked, contributor provided reasoning
 **Triage:** Conversation may contain [CLAIM], [ENTITY], or [EVIDENCE] for extraction.
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- Telegram exchange between @m3taversal and Rio on 2026-03-23
+- @m3taversal confirmed Rio was able to read the article this time after a previous failed attempt
+- Rio acknowledged not being able to see linked content in a previous interaction