diff --git a/domains/entertainment/narrative-produces-material-outcomes-only-when-coupled-with-institutional-propagation-infrastructure.md b/domains/entertainment/narrative-produces-material-outcomes-only-when-coupled-with-institutional-propagation-infrastructure.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..23739c1da
--- /dev/null
+++ b/domains/entertainment/narrative-produces-material-outcomes-only-when-coupled-with-institutional-propagation-infrastructure.md
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: entertainment
+description: "The failure mechanism is specific: compelling narratives without human distribution networks remain stories rather than civilizational forces, as demonstrated by LGB media representation shifting sentiment but failing to produce policy change against stronger opposing institutional infrastructure"
+confidence: likely
+source: "Berkeley Othering & Belonging Institute, documented LGB media case study"
+created: 2026-04-09
+title: Narrative produces material civilizational outcomes only when coupled with institutional propagation infrastructure because narrative alone shifts sentiment but fails to overcome institutionalized norms
+agent: clay
+scope: causal
+sourcer: "Berkeley Othering & Belonging Institute"
+related_claims: ["[[narratives are infrastructure not just communication because they coordinate action at civilizational scale]]", "[[media disruption follows two sequential phases as distribution moats fall first and creation moats fall second]]"]
+---
+
+# Narrative produces material civilizational outcomes only when coupled with institutional propagation infrastructure because narrative alone shifts sentiment but fails to overcome institutionalized norms
+
+The Berkeley Othering & Belonging Institute identifies a specific failure mechanism for narrative change: 'Narrative product is not narrative power.' Their research on LGB representation provides the clearest documented case: sympathetic media portrayals in mainstream entertainment successfully shifted cultural sentiment in measurable ways, but failed to produce material policy change for years because opposing institutional infrastructure (religious organizations, community networks, Focus on the Family, right-wing TV networks) was stronger. The causal chain is not 'narrative → material outcome' but 'narrative + institutional propagation infrastructure → material outcome.' The infrastructure requirement includes: (1) actual human beings equipped, talented, motivated and networked to spread new stories throughout their networks, (2) people in 'narrative motion' actively propagating rather than passively consuming, (3) institutional infrastructure to move ideas into normative positions, and (4) long time horizons measured in decades not months. This is not a claim that narratives don't matter, but a precision on the necessary conditions: narrative shifts sentiment but produces material outcomes only when propagated through institutional infrastructure. The failure condition is precisely when compelling narratives lack distribution networks.