teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 9 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 82

vida: extract claims from 2025-00-00-nhs-england-waiting-times-underfunding.md

Browse source 
- Source: inbox/archive/2025-00-00-nhs-england-waiting-times-underfunding.md
- Domain: health
- Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 2)

Pentagon-Agent: Vida <HEADLESS>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-03-11 04:36:42 +00:00
parent 5a3d603e78
commit c24eba39fb
1 changed files with 17 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

18
inbox/archive/2025-00-00-nhs-england-waiting-times-underfunding.md
View file

@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2025-01-01
domain: health domain: health
secondary_domains: [] secondary_domains: []
format: report format: report
status: unprocessed status: null-result
priority: medium priority: medium
tags: [nhs, universal-coverage, waiting-times, underfunding, international-comparison, uk-healthcare] tags: [nhs, universal-coverage, waiting-times, underfunding, international-comparison, uk-healthcare]
processed_by: vida
processed_date: 2025-01-01
enrichments_applied: ["value-based care transitions stall at the payment boundary because 60 percent of payments touch value metrics but only 14 percent bear full risk.md", "medical care explains only 10-20 percent of health outcomes because behavioral social and genetic factors dominate as four independent methodologies confirm.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "Extracted two claims about the NHS paradox (universal coverage + excellent primary care + worst specialty access) and single-payer administrative efficiency not translating to delivery efficiency. Enriched existing claims on value-based care payment boundaries and medical care's limited impact on health outcomes. The NHS is the cautionary tale for 'single-payer solves everything' and the counter-example to 'universal coverage guarantees good outcomes.' Key insight: different system designs optimize different dimensions, and no architecture solves all problems simultaneously."
--- ---
## Content ## Content
@ -60,3 +65,14 @@ tags: [nhs, universal-coverage, waiting-times, underfunding, international-compa
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[medical care explains only 10-20 percent of health outcomes because behavioral social and genetic factors dominate as four independent methodologies confirm]] PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[medical care explains only 10-20 percent of health outcomes because behavioral social and genetic factors dominate as four independent methodologies confirm]]
WHY ARCHIVED: Cautionary international comparison — shows what universal coverage does and doesn't solve. WHY ARCHIVED: Cautionary international comparison — shows what universal coverage does and doesn't solve.
EXTRACTION HINT: The paradox of ranking 3rd overall while having worst specialty access is the extractable insight. Different metrics tell different stories about the same system. EXTRACTION HINT: The paradox of ranking 3rd overall while having worst specialty access is the extractable insight. Different metrics tell different stories about the same system.
## Key Facts
- Only 58.9% of 7.5M NHS waiting patients seen within 18 weeks (target: 92%) as of 2025
- 22% of NHS patients waiting >6 weeks for diagnostic tests (standard: 1%)
- NHS waiting list must be halved to 3.4 million to reach 92% standard
- Respiratory medicine waiting lists increased 263% over past decade
- Gynaecology waiting lists increased 223% over past decade
- NHS has shortfall of 3.6 million diagnostic tests
- NHS ranked 3rd overall in Commonwealth Fund Mirror Mirror 2024
- Trauma/orthopaedics and ENT have largest waiting times in NHS