auto-fix: strip 20 broken wiki links
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents
parent
3d336201cd
commit
c2cacf6c83
3 changed files with 20 additions and 20 deletions
|
|
@ -26,7 +26,7 @@ The three conditions that claim identifies are exactly what the game design need
|
|||
|
||||
1. **Wrong challenges have real cost** — contributors who submit low-quality challenges or false claims should lose standing, not just fail to gain. This is the skin-in-the-game requirement. Without it, adversarial dynamics devolve into noise generation.
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Evaluation is structurally separated from contribution** — our proposer/evaluator split (agents propose, Leo + peers evaluate) already does this. The contributor proposes, the collective evaluates. This prevents the self-review problem that [[single evaluator bottleneck means review throughput scales linearly with proposer count]] identifies.
|
||||
2. **Evaluation is structurally separated from contribution** — our proposer/evaluator split (agents propose, Leo + peers evaluate) already does this. The contributor proposes, the collective evaluates. This prevents the self-review problem that single evaluator bottleneck means review throughput scales linearly with proposer count identifies.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Confirmation is rewarded alongside novelty** — this is the one most likely to get lost in gamification. If we only reward NEW claims, we incentivize novelty-seeking over evidence-strengthening. Contributors who find new evidence for existing claims, or who attempt to challenge a claim and fail (thereby confirming it), need to earn credit too. The importance-weighted system Cory described handles this if enrichments and failed-but-honest challenges count.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -127,7 +127,7 @@ Two phases:
|
|||
|
||||
- [[partial connectivity produces better collective intelligence than full connectivity on complex problems because it preserves diversity]] — our agent architecture does this. Each agent has a domain lens. They don't see everything identically. The wiki-link graph creates partial connectivity. This is correct.
|
||||
|
||||
- [[adversarial contribution produces higher-quality collective knowledge than collaborative contribution]] — the challenge mechanism in the game embodies this directly.
|
||||
- adversarial contribution produces higher-quality collective knowledge than collaborative contribution — the challenge mechanism in the game embodies this directly.
|
||||
|
||||
- [[collective intelligence requires diversity as a structural precondition not a moral preference]] — six agents with different domain priors IS structural diversity. But it's diversity of knowledge, not of cognitive architecture (all Claude). We should be honest about this limitation publicly.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ decisions/
|
|||
4. Not a duplicate of existing decision
|
||||
5. Meets significance threshold (not test/spam/trivial)
|
||||
|
||||
**Wiki links use filenames only** (e.g., `[[metadao-hire-robin-hanson]]`), not full paths.
|
||||
**Wiki links use filenames only** (e.g., `metadao-hire-robin-hanson`), not full paths.
|
||||
|
||||
## Body Format
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -128,8 +128,8 @@ decisions/
|
|||
[Why this decision matters — what it reveals about governance dynamics, organizational direction, or mechanism design]
|
||||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
- [[parent-entity]] — governance decision
|
||||
- [[relevant-claim]] — how this decision relates to broader thesis
|
||||
- parent-entity — governance decision
|
||||
- relevant-claim — how this decision relates to broader thesis
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Difference from Entities
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -159,8 +159,8 @@ Governance decisions, prediction market questions, and futarchy proposals are **
|
|||
## Key Decisions
|
||||
| Date | Proposal | Proposer | Volume | Outcome |
|
||||
|------|----------|----------|--------|---------|
|
||||
| 2025-02-10 | [[metadao-hire-robin-hanson]] | proph3t | $X | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-03-03 | [[metadao-burn-993-meta]] | proph3t | $X | Passed |
|
||||
| 2025-02-10 | metadao-hire-robin-hanson | proph3t | $X | Passed |
|
||||
| 2024-03-03 | metadao-burn-993-meta | proph3t | $X | Passed |
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Company-Specific Fields
|
||||
|
|
@ -168,9 +168,9 @@ Governance decisions, prediction market questions, and futarchy proposals are **
|
|||
```yaml
|
||||
# Company attributes (also used by protocol, exchange, fund, lab, studio, insurer, provider)
|
||||
founded: YYYY-MM-DD
|
||||
founders: ["[[person-entity]]"]
|
||||
founders: ["person-entity"]
|
||||
category: "DeFi lending protocol"
|
||||
parent: "[[parent-entity]]" # e.g., [[futardio]] for launched projects
|
||||
parent: "parent-entity" # e.g., [[futardio]] for launched projects
|
||||
stage: seed | growth | mature | declining | liquidated
|
||||
market_cap: "$X" # latest known, with date in body
|
||||
funding: "$X raised" # total known funding
|
||||
|
|
@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ key_metrics:
|
|||
tvl: "$40B"
|
||||
volume: "$X"
|
||||
users: "X"
|
||||
competitors: ["[[competitor-entity]]"]
|
||||
competitors: ["competitor-entity"]
|
||||
built_on: ["Solana", "Ethereum"]
|
||||
|
||||
# Capital formation fields (for launched/funded entities)
|
||||
|
|
@ -200,14 +200,14 @@ People entities serve dual purpose: they track public figures we analyze AND ser
|
|||
```yaml
|
||||
# Person attributes (also used by creator)
|
||||
role: "Founder & CEO of Aave"
|
||||
organizations: ["[[company-entity]]"]
|
||||
organizations: ["company-entity"]
|
||||
followers: 290000 # primary platform
|
||||
credibility_basis: "10 years building largest DeFi protocol"
|
||||
known_positions:
|
||||
- "DAOs need founder-led execution with onchain accountability"
|
||||
- "DeFi must capture traditional lending market"
|
||||
influences: ["[[person-entity]]"] # who they cite/follow
|
||||
influenced_by: ["[[person-entity]]"]
|
||||
influences: ["person-entity"] # who they cite/follow
|
||||
influenced_by: ["person-entity"]
|
||||
|
||||
# Contributor attributes (populated if/when they engage with the KB)
|
||||
contributor: false # becomes true when they contribute
|
||||
|
|
@ -222,17 +222,17 @@ attribution_handle: null # how they want to be credited
|
|||
# Organization attributes (also used by governance_body)
|
||||
jurisdiction: "United States"
|
||||
authority: "Securities regulation" # what this body governs
|
||||
parent_body: "[[parent-organization]]"
|
||||
parent_body: "parent-organization"
|
||||
|
||||
# Product attributes (also used by token, vehicle, drug, model, framework, franchise, platform)
|
||||
maker: "[[company-entity]]" # who built/maintains this
|
||||
maker: "company-entity" # who built/maintains this
|
||||
launched: YYYY-MM-DD
|
||||
category: "futarchy governance program"
|
||||
|
||||
# Market attributes
|
||||
total_size: "$120B TVL"
|
||||
growth_rate: "flat since 2021"
|
||||
key_players: ["[[company-entity]]"]
|
||||
key_players: ["company-entity"]
|
||||
market_structure: "winner-take-most | fragmented | consolidating"
|
||||
regulatory_status: "emerging clarity | hostile | supportive"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
|
@ -263,17 +263,17 @@ regulatory_status: "emerging clarity | hostile | supportive"
|
|||
|
||||
## Relationship to KB
|
||||
[Which claims, beliefs, or positions depend on or reference this entity]
|
||||
- [[claim-title]] — how this entity relates
|
||||
- claim-title — how this entity relates
|
||||
- [[belief]] — what this entity's trajectory means for our worldview
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Relevant Entities:
|
||||
- [[competitor]] — competitive relationship
|
||||
- [[founder]] — founded by
|
||||
- competitor — competitive relationship
|
||||
- founder — founded by
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[domain-map]]
|
||||
- domain-map
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Governance
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue