From c404742dae62995a247a64c13d11aef69cdf1adc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Teleo Agents Date: Fri, 20 Mar 2026 04:57:32 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] auto-fix: strip 2 broken wiki links Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base. --- ...model makes the net cost impact inflationary through 2035.md | 2 +- ...affordability-not-just-clinical-factors-drive-persistence.md | 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/domains/health/GLP-1 receptor agonists are the largest therapeutic category launch in pharmaceutical history but their chronic use model makes the net cost impact inflationary through 2035.md b/domains/health/GLP-1 receptor agonists are the largest therapeutic category launch in pharmaceutical history but their chronic use model makes the net cost impact inflationary through 2035.md index 958fa002..19b51500 100644 --- a/domains/health/GLP-1 receptor agonists are the largest therapeutic category launch in pharmaceutical history but their chronic use model makes the net cost impact inflationary through 2035.md +++ b/domains/health/GLP-1 receptor agonists are the largest therapeutic category launch in pharmaceutical history but their chronic use model makes the net cost impact inflationary through 2035.md @@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ If GLP-1 + exercise combination produces durable weight maintenance (3.5 kg rega ### Additional Evidence (challenge) -*Source: [[2026-01-13-aon-glp1-employer-cost-savings-cancer-reduction]] | Added: 2026-03-19* +*Source: 2026-01-13-aon-glp1-employer-cost-savings-cancer-reduction | Added: 2026-03-19* Aon's 192,000+ patient analysis shows the inflationary impact is front-loaded and time-limited: costs rise 23% vs 10% in year 1, but after 12 months medical costs grow just 2% vs 6% for non-users. At 30 months for diabetes patients, medical cost growth is 6-9 percentage points lower. This suggests the 'inflationary through 2035' claim may be true only for short-term payers who never capture the year-2+ savings, while long-term risk-bearers see net cost reduction. The inflationary impact depends on payment model structure, not just the chronic use model itself. diff --git a/domains/health/lower-income-patients-show-higher-glp-1-discontinuation-rates-suggesting-affordability-not-just-clinical-factors-drive-persistence.md b/domains/health/lower-income-patients-show-higher-glp-1-discontinuation-rates-suggesting-affordability-not-just-clinical-factors-drive-persistence.md index 914b402e..4efeb540 100644 --- a/domains/health/lower-income-patients-show-higher-glp-1-discontinuation-rates-suggesting-affordability-not-just-clinical-factors-drive-persistence.md +++ b/domains/health/lower-income-patients-show-higher-glp-1-discontinuation-rates-suggesting-affordability-not-just-clinical-factors-drive-persistence.md @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ The Trump Administration deal establishes a $50/month out-of-pocket maximum for ### Additional Evidence (confirm) -*Source: [[2026-01-13-aon-glp1-employer-cost-savings-cancer-reduction]] | Added: 2026-03-18* +*Source: 2026-01-13-aon-glp1-employer-cost-savings-cancer-reduction | Added: 2026-03-18* Aon's commercial claims data (employer-sponsored insurance) shows strong adherence effects, but the sample is biased toward higher-income employed populations. The fact that even in this relatively advantaged cohort, adherence is the key determinant of cost-effectiveness supports the claim that affordability barriers in lower-income populations would be even more binding.