diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-03-25-cftc-anprm-prediction-markets-law-firm-analysis.md b/inbox/queue/2026-03-25-cftc-anprm-prediction-markets-law-firm-analysis.md
deleted file mode 100644
index 5b2c4858..00000000
--- a/inbox/queue/2026-03-25-cftc-anprm-prediction-markets-law-firm-analysis.md
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,90 +0,0 @@
----
-type: source
-title: "CFTC ANPRM on Prediction Markets — Law Firm Analyses and Futarchy Advocacy Gap"
-author: "Multiple (Sidley Austin, Norton Rose Fulbright, Davis Wright Tremaine, Prokopiev Law)"
-url: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2026/03/16/2026-05105/prediction-markets
-date: 2026-03-16
-domain: internet-finance
-secondary_domains: []
-format: thread
-status: enrichment
-priority: high
-tags: [cftc, prediction-markets, futarchy, regulation, anprm, governance-markets, advocacy-gap]
-processed_by: rio
-processed_date: 2026-03-25
-enrichments_applied: ["polymarket-achieved-us-regulatory-legitimacy-through-qcx-acquisition-establishing-prediction-markets-as-cftc-regulated-derivatives.md"]
-extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
----
-
-## Content
-
-The CFTC issued an Advance Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (ANPRM) on prediction markets on March 12, 2026. Published in the Federal Register March 16 (docket RIN 3038-AF65). Comment period closes April 30, 2026 (45 days).
-
-**ANPRM scope:** 40+ questions covering:
-- Manipulation susceptibility of prediction markets
-- Settlement methodology and verifiability
-- Insider trading risks in prediction markets
-- Position limits and margin trading
-- Blockchain-based prediction markets and operational risk
-- DCM Core Principles applicability to event contracts
-- Public interest determination criteria
-
-**Industry context:** The ANPRM was issued as prediction markets grew to >$13B industry size. Polymarket CFTC-approved (2025 via QCX acquisition, $112M). Kalshi CFTC-regulated. 19+ federal lawsuits in the state-federal jurisdiction battle. 5c(c) Capital (March 23): VC fund backed by Polymarket CEO Shayne Coplan and Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour, investing in prediction market companies.
-
-**What the ANPRM does NOT address:**
-Four major law firm analyses (Sidley Austin, Norton Rose Fulbright, Davis Wright Tremaine, Prokopiev Law) consistently note: **no mention of futarchy, DAO governance markets, corporate governance decision markets, or on-chain governance applications.** The ANPRM treats prediction markets as a uniform category spanning sports, elections, commodities, and economics.
-
-**The futarchy classification gap:**
-
-The ANPRM creates a de facto taxonomy: event contracts are regulated under the CEA as swaps or commodity options. Governance decision markets (which resolve endogenous organizational decisions, not exogenous events) could be classified as:
-(a) Not event contracts (because the "event" is the organization's own decision — the contract is co-extensive with the decision)
-(b) Event contracts on exogenous binary outcomes (same framework as sports/elections)
-
-Without a futarchy-specific comment, (b) is the default. Under (b), MetaDAO governance markets face the same gaming classification risk as Kalshi election markets — the existential regulatory risk identified in Session 3.
-
-**The advocacy gap as of March 25:** No entity has filed a futarchy-specific CFTC comment. Search of the regulations.gov docket shows no filings specifically addressing governance decision markets, DAO treasuries, or on-chain governance applications. Five major law firms mobilized by the ANPRM; none are representing futarchy interests.
-
-**The argument for comment filing:**
-
-Governance decision markets differ from event prediction contracts in:
-1. **Structure:** They resolve endogenous decisions, not exogenous events. The "outcome" is determined by the organization, not independent reality.
-2. **Function:** They coordinate joint ownership decisions, not information markets about external facts. The mechanism's purpose is governance, not prediction.
-3. **Hedging utility:** Stakers in governance markets hedge their ownership interest in the organization. This is closer to corporate hedging (CFTC-regulated) than sports gambling (state-regulated).
-4. **Harm profile:** The harms the state gaming laws protect against (addiction, fraud) are structurally different from the risks in governance markets (manipulation of organizational decisions, which has different regulation under corporate law).
-
-**Institutional legitimization happening simultaneously:**
-
-Truth Predict (Trump Media, March 2026): Trump's media company entering prediction markets. Signals mainstream political adoption but also potential for the "gambling" framing to dominate regulatory discourse if futarchy-specific advocacy is absent.
-
-## Agent Notes
-**Why this matters:** This is the most direct and time-bounded regulatory intervention opportunity in the KB. 36 days remain. No one is making the futarchy argument. The KB has spent 11 sessions documenting the gaming classification risk (Session 3 as primary concern) — this is the advocacy window to address it.
-
-**What surprised me:** The total absence of futarchy from any of the law firm analyses is more striking than I expected. These are firms representing major crypto clients. The fact that none of them separately noted futarchy suggests either: (a) they don't know MetaDAO exists, (b) they don't consider governance markets materially different from event prediction, or (c) they have no futarchy clients. All three possibilities are concerning.
-
-**What I expected but didn't find:** Any indication that MetaDAO, Robin Hanson, or Proph3t has submitted or is planning to submit a CFTC comment. META-036 (if it passed) would fund academic research that could inform such a comment, but the practical regulatory window closes before the research would complete.
-
-**KB connections:**
-- The gaming classification of prediction markets is the primary regulatory threat to futarchy governance — worse than the securities classification risk — this is the direct evidence that the gaming classification risk is unaddressed
-- CFTC ANPRM regulatory analysis (Session 9 archive, if filed) — enrichment target
-- Decentralized mechanism design creates regulatory defensibility (Belief #6) — the Howey analysis doesn't help here; the gaming classification requires a completely separate argument
-
-**Extraction hints:**
-1. CLAIM: CFTC ANPRM contains no futarchy-specific questions, creating default gaming classification risk for governance decision markets — high confidence, directly documented
-2. CLAIM: Governance decision markets are structurally distinguishable from event prediction contracts on three dimensions (endogenous vs. exogenous resolution, coordination vs. information function, hedging utility vs. speculative) — needs development
-3. ADVOCACY NOTE: This source documents the advocacy gap; the claim it generates may be more valuable as a position paper framework than as a KB claim
-
-**Context:** The comment period represents the lowest-friction regulatory intervention. Pre-rule ANPRM is the stage where conceptual distinctions are drawn; once NPRM is issued, the framework is set and changing it requires countering an established proposal. The 2-3 year rulemaking timeline means whatever framework is set by comments will govern for many years.
-
-## Curator Notes
-PRIMARY CONNECTION: Gaming classification risk claim (identified in Sessions 2-3 as existential regulatory threat to futarchy)
-WHY ARCHIVED: Documents the advocacy gap and closes the loop on the multi-session CFTC regulatory thread; actionable with 36 days remaining
-EXTRACTION HINT: Extract as TWO claims: (1) the advocacy gap as an empirical fact, (2) the structural argument for distinguishing governance markets from event prediction — these are different claims with different confidence levels
-
-
-## Key Facts
-- CFTC ANPRM published March 16, 2026 in Federal Register (docket RIN 3038-AF65)
-- Comment period closes April 30, 2026 (45 days)
-- Prediction markets grew to >$13B industry size by March 2026
-- 19+ federal lawsuits in state-federal jurisdiction battle over prediction markets
-- No futarchy-specific comments filed in regulations.gov docket as of March 25, 2026
-- ANPRM contains 40+ questions on manipulation, settlement, insider trading, position limits, blockchain risk, and DCM Core Principles