diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md b/domains/internet-finance/MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md
index a5982cc6..9247774e 100644
--- a/domains/internet-finance/MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md	
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md	
@@ -188,12 +188,12 @@ Multiple X posts reference Robin Hanson's direct involvement with MetaDAO, with
 P2P.me is conducting an ICO through MetaDAO's platform, demonstrating the platform's use for non-custodial fiat-to-crypto ramps. The project has ~23K registered users, peaked at $3.95M monthly volume, and operates primarily in India (78%) and Brazil (15%). Community engagement around allocation multipliers (3x preferential allocations) shows the ICO mechanics in practice.
 
 ### Additional Evidence (extend)
-*Source: [[2026-03-21-pineanalytics-metadao-q4-2025-report]] | Added: 2026-03-24*
+*Source: 2026-03-21-pineanalytics-metadao-q4-2025-report | Added: 2026-03-24*
 
 MetaDAO reached first operating profitability in Q4 2025 with $2.51M in fee revenue from Futarchy AMM and Meteora pools. The platform expanded from 2 to 8 futarchy-governed protocols in a single quarter, with non-META futarchy market cap reaching $69M. This demonstrates the platform has achieved operational sustainability and meaningful ecosystem adoption beyond its native token. However, revenue 'declined sharply since mid-December' as ICO activity slowed, and the platform maintains 15+ quarters of runway at current burn rate.
 
 ### Additional Evidence (confirm)
-*Source: [[2026-03-23-x-research-metadao-governance-proposal]] | Added: 2026-03-24*
+*Source: 2026-03-23-x-research-metadao-governance-proposal | Added: 2026-03-24*
 
 MetaDAO governance proposal with 84% likelihood to pass and $408k traded demonstrates active futarchy-governed decision-making. Multiple sources reference MetaDAO's operational governance continuing 'rain or shine' during market volatility.
 
diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/metadao-ico-platform-demonstrates-15x-oversubscription-validating-futarchy-governed-capital-formation.md b/domains/internet-finance/metadao-ico-platform-demonstrates-15x-oversubscription-validating-futarchy-governed-capital-formation.md
index c708585d..71c9ca4f 100644
--- a/domains/internet-finance/metadao-ico-platform-demonstrates-15x-oversubscription-validating-futarchy-governed-capital-formation.md
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/metadao-ico-platform-demonstrates-15x-oversubscription-validating-futarchy-governed-capital-formation.md
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ Umbra Privacy ICO achieved 206x oversubscription ($155M commitments vs $750K tar
 Through Q4 2025, MetaDAO hosted 8 total ICOs raising $25.6M from $390M in committed capital (15x aggregate oversubscription). 6 of these ICOs launched in Q4 2025 alone, with $18.7M raised in that quarter. The $390M committed vs. $25.6M raised ratio suggests the oversubscription metric may overstate genuine investor conviction, as most capital was signaling interest rather than actually deploying.
 
 ### Additional Evidence (extend)
-*Source: [[2026-03-19-pineanalytics-p2p-metadao-ico-analysis]] | Added: 2026-03-24*
+*Source: 2026-03-19-pineanalytics-p2p-metadao-ico-analysis | Added: 2026-03-24*
 
 P2P.me ICO targeting $6M at $15.5M FDV represents a stretched valuation case (182x gross profit multiple) that tests whether MetaDAO's futarchy governance can correctly filter overpriced deals. Pine Analytics identifies fundamental concerns: $82K annual gross profit, plateaued user growth since mid-2025, and 50% liquid float at TGE creating FairScale-style liquidation risk. The outcome (pass/fail after March 26, 2026) will provide evidence on whether community judgment overrides analyst signals or whether futarchy markets correctly price stretched valuations.
 
diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/ownership coins primary value proposition is investor protection not governance quality because anti-rug enforcement through market-governed liquidation creates credible exit guarantees that no amount of decision optimization can match.md b/domains/internet-finance/ownership coins primary value proposition is investor protection not governance quality because anti-rug enforcement through market-governed liquidation creates credible exit guarantees that no amount of decision optimization can match.md
index d3926401..62bb2bec 100644
--- a/domains/internet-finance/ownership coins primary value proposition is investor protection not governance quality because anti-rug enforcement through market-governed liquidation creates credible exit guarantees that no amount of decision optimization can match.md	
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/ownership coins primary value proposition is investor protection not governance quality because anti-rug enforcement through market-governed liquidation creates credible exit guarantees that no amount of decision optimization can match.md	
@@ -44,10 +44,10 @@ Futardio cult's $11.4M raise against $50,000 target with stated use of funds for
 
 
 ### Additional Evidence (confirm)
-*Source: [[2026-02-26-futardio-launch-fitbyte]] | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
+*Source: 2026-02-26-futardio-launch-fitbyte | Added: 2026-03-11 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
 
 FitByte's pitch explicitly frames MetaDAO's unruggable ICO structure as investor protection through structural enforcement: 'The mechanism does not rely on trust. It does not require goodwill. It is structurally enforced.' The pitch emphasizes treasury governance, IP ownership through DAO LLC, and performance-gated founder unlocks as credibility mechanisms, not as superior decision-making tools. The framing is entirely about preventing founder extraction and ensuring investor sovereignty, with governance quality mentioned only as a secondary benefit. This confirms that even projects themselves understand and market the ownership coin value proposition as protection-first.
-*Source: [[2026-01-00-alearesearch-metadao-fair-launches-misaligned-market]] | Added: 2026-03-12 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
+*Source: 2026-01-00-alearesearch-metadao-fair-launches-misaligned-market | Added: 2026-03-12 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
 
 MetaDAO's fair launch structure demonstrates investor protection through three mechanisms: (1) No private allocations—all participants pay identical prices during defined windows; (2) Market-governed treasury where founders receive only monthly allowances and larger expenditures require community approval through futarchy; (3) Mechanistic safeguards where IP and revenue are legally tied to ownership coins, and if a token trades below NAV, anyone can propose returning capital. Eight ICOs from April 2025-January 2026 raised $25.6M with no reported rug pulls despite 15x oversubscription creating strong incentives for founder extraction.