teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 116 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

theseus: extract from 2025-12-00-fullstack-alignment-thick-models-value.md

Browse source 
- Source: inbox/archive/2025-12-00-fullstack-alignment-thick-models-value.md
- Domain: ai-alignment
- Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 3)

Pentagon-Agent: Theseus <HEADLESS>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-03-12 12:34:19 +00:00
parent ba4ac4a73e
commit cdd8bd03d1
1 changed files with 6 additions and 1 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

7
inbox/archive/2025-12-00-fullstack-alignment-thick-models-value.md
View file

@ -7,9 +7,14 @@ date: 2025-12-01
domain: ai-alignment
secondary_domains: [mechanisms, grand-strategy]
format: paper
status: unprocessed
status: null-result
priority: medium
tags: [full-stack-alignment, institutional-alignment, thick-values, normative-competence, co-alignment]
processed_by: theseus
processed_date: 2026-03-11
enrichments_applied: ["AI alignment is a coordination problem not a technical problem.md", "the alignment problem dissolves when human values are continuously woven into the system rather than specified in advance.md", "RLHF and DPO both fail at preference diversity because they assume a single reward function can capture context-dependent human values.md"]
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
extraction_notes: "Extracted two novel claims about full-stack alignment and thick value models. Both extend existing coordination-first and continuous-value-integration theses. Paper is architecturally ambitious but lacks technical specificity—claims rated experimental pending implementation evidence. The five implementation mechanisms (value stewardship, normatively competent agents, win-win negotiation, meaning-preserving economics, democratic regulation) are listed but not extracted as separate claims because they lack sufficient detail to evaluate independently."
---
## Content