teleo/teleo-codex
8
0
Fork 0
Code Issues 22 Pull requests 11 Projects Releases Packages Wiki Activity Actions 1

auto-fix: strip 2 broken wiki links

Browse source 
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links
that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-03-16 12:57:09 +00:00
parent c90c461e8f
commit cfa7a9ee33
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions
Show stats Download patch file Download diff file Expand all files Collapse all files

4
inbox/archive/2026-01-00-nevada-polymarket-lawsuit-prediction-markets.md
View file

@ -50,12 +50,12 @@ extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
**Why this matters:** This is the most existential regulatory risk for futarchy that the KB doesn't adequately capture. If prediction markets are classified as "gaming" subject to state regulation, futarchy governance faces 50-state licensing — practically impossible for a permissionless protocol. If CFTC exclusive jurisdiction holds, futarchy operates under one federal framework.
**What surprised me:** 36 states filing amicus briefs against federal preemption. This is not a fringe position — it's a majority of states. The gaming industry lobby is clearly mobilized against prediction markets.
**What I expected but didn't find:** Any specific analysis of how this affects non-sports prediction markets (like futarchy governance markets). The lawsuits focus on sports events — futarchy markets about protocol governance may be treated differently.
**KB connections:** [[Futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders]] — irrelevant if the market is illegal in most states. [[Polymarket vindicated prediction markets over polling in 2024 US election]] — Polymarket's legal viability is now in question.
**KB connections:** Futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders — irrelevant if the market is illegal in most states. [[Polymarket vindicated prediction markets over polling in 2024 US election]] — Polymarket's legal viability is now in question.
**Extraction hints:** New claim about state-federal jurisdiction as existential risk for futarchy. Distinction between sports prediction markets and governance prediction markets.
**Context:** This is the single most important regulatory development for the futarchy thesis since Polymarket's CFTC approval. The circuit split virtually guarantees eventual Supreme Court involvement.
## Curator Notes (structured handoff for extractor)
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[Futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders]]
PRIMARY CONNECTION: Futarchy is manipulation-resistant because attack attempts create profitable opportunities for defenders
WHY ARCHIVED: State-federal jurisdiction crisis is the highest-stakes regulatory question for futarchy. If states win, futarchy governance becomes impractical. The KB has no claim covering this risk. Also important: the sports vs governance market distinction — futarchy markets may be classified differently than sports betting markets.
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on (1) existential risk to futarchy from state gaming classification, (2) distinction between sports prediction and governance prediction markets, (3) CFTC rulemaking as potential resolution path.