diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/cryptographic-stake-weighted-trust-solves-autonomous-agent-coordination-without-central-authority-because-agentrank-adapts-pagerank-to-verifiable-computational-contribution.md b/domains/internet-finance/cryptographic-stake-weighted-trust-solves-autonomous-agent-coordination-without-central-authority-because-agentrank-adapts-pagerank-to-verifiable-computational-contribution.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..cb538801
--- /dev/null
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/cryptographic-stake-weighted-trust-solves-autonomous-agent-coordination-without-central-authority-because-agentrank-adapts-pagerank-to-verifiable-computational-contribution.md
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: internet-finance
+description: "Hyperspace's AgentRank protocol anchors autonomous agent trust to cryptographically verified computational stake, adapting PageRank to P2P agent networks — a mechanism design for reputation in multi-agent systems where no central evaluator exists"
+confidence: speculative
+source: "Rio via @varun_mathur, Hyperspace AI; AgentRank whitepaper (March 15, 2026)"
+created: 2026-03-16
+secondary_domains:
+  - ai-alignment
+  - mechanisms
+depends_on:
+  - "speculative markets aggregate information through incentive and selection effects not wisdom of crowds"
+flagged_for:
+  - theseus
+challenged_by:
+  - "Single empirical test (333 experiments, 35 agents). Scale and adversarial robustness are untested."
+  - "Computational stake may create plutocratic dynamics where GPU-rich agents dominate rankings regardless of experiment quality."
+---
+
+# Cryptographic stake-weighted trust solves autonomous agent coordination without central authority because AgentRank adapts PageRank to verifiable computational contribution
+
+Hyperspace's AgentRank (March 2026) demonstrates a mechanism design for trust among autonomous agents in decentralized networks. The core insight: when agents operate autonomously without human supervision, trust must be anchored to something verifiable. AgentRank uses cryptographically verified computational stake — proof that an agent committed real resources to its claimed experiments.
+
+**How it works:**
+1. Agents on a P2P network run ML experiments autonomously
+2. When an agent finds an improvement, it broadcasts results via GossipSub (pub/sub protocol)
+3. Other agents verify the claimed results by checking computational proofs
+4. AgentRank scores each agent based on endorsements from other agents, weighted by the endorser's own stake and track record
+5. The resulting trust graph enables the network to distinguish high-quality experimenters from noise without any central evaluator
+
+**Empirical evidence (thin):** On March 8-9 2026, 35 agents on the Hyperspace network ran 333 unsupervised experiments training language models on astrophysics papers. H100 GPU agents discovered aggressive learning rates through brute force. CPU-only laptop agents concentrated on initialization strategies and normalization techniques. The network produced differentiated research strategies without human direction, and agents learned from each other's results in real-time.
+
+**Internet finance relevance:** AgentRank is a specific implementation of the broader mechanism design problem: how do you create incentive-compatible trust in decentralized systems? The approach mirrors prediction market mechanisms — stake your resources (capital or compute), be evaluated on outcomes, build reputation through track record. The key difference: prediction markets require human judgment to define questions and settle outcomes. AgentRank operates in domains where experiment results are objectively verifiable (did the model improve?), bypassing the oracle problem.
+
+**Open questions:**
+- Does stake-weighted trust create GPU plutocracy? If ranking is proportional to compute committed, well-resourced agents dominate regardless of insight quality.
+- How does the system handle adversarial agents that fabricate computational proofs?
+- Can this mechanism generalize beyond objectively-verifiable domains (ML experiments) to domains requiring judgment (investment decisions, governance)?
+
+---
+
+Relevant Notes:
+- [[speculative markets aggregate information through incentive and selection effects not wisdom of crowds]] — AgentRank uses similar mechanism: stake creates incentive, track record creates selection
+- [[expert staking in Living Capital uses Numerai-style bounded burns for performance and escalating dispute bonds for fraud creating accountability without deterring participation]] — parallel staking mechanism for human experts, AgentRank does the same for autonomous agents
+- [[all agents running the same model family creates correlated blind spots that adversarial review cannot catch because the evaluator shares the proposers training biases]] — Hyperspace's heterogeneous compute (H100 vs CPU) naturally creates diversity. Mechanism design insight for our own pipeline.
+
+Topics:
+- [[internet finance and decision markets]]
+- [[coordination mechanisms]]