diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md b/domains/internet-finance/MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md
index af4a788cc..89057bb20 100644
--- a/domains/internet-finance/MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md	
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md	
@@ -82,6 +82,12 @@ Futardio cult launch (2026-03-03 to 2026-03-04) demonstrates MetaDAO's platform
 
 (challenge) Areal's failed Futardio launch ($11,654 raised of $50K target, REFUNDING status) demonstrates that futarchy-governed fundraising does not guarantee capital formation success. The mechanism provides credible exit guarantees through market-governed liquidation and governance quality through conditional markets, but market participants still evaluate project fundamentals and team credibility. Futarchy reduces rug risk but does not eliminate market skepticism of unproven business models or early-stage teams.
 
+
+### Additional Evidence (extend)
+*Source: [[2026-02-00-metadao-strategic-reset-permissionless]] | Added: 2026-03-12 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
+
+MetaDAO is transitioning from curated to permissionless launches with a proposed 'verified launch' trust layer. Revenue data shows ~$2.4M total since Futarchy AMM launch (Oct 10, 2025), split 60% AMM fees / 40% Meteora LP. Revenue declined sharply since mid-December as ICO activity slowed, demonstrating that curated models create unsustainable cadence problems. The platform is moving toward permissionless infrastructure with reputation-based quality signaling layered on top, described as 'like blue tick on X' where trusted ecosystem partners can refer projects for verification without blocking permissionless access.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:
diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility.md b/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility.md
index d46eb2420..92e48d9ff 100644
--- a/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility.md	
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility.md	
@@ -32,6 +32,12 @@ The implication for Living Capital: since [[agents create dozens of proposals bu
 - The "reputational liability" framing assumes MetaDAO's brand is the primary draw — but if futarchy governance itself is the value, the brand is secondary
 - Two-tier systems tend to become de facto caste systems where the lower tier never graduates to the upper tier
 
+
+### Additional Evidence (confirm)
+*Source: [[2026-02-00-metadao-strategic-reset-permissionless]] | Added: 2026-03-12 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
+
+MetaDAO's proposed solution to the curation-vs-permissionless tension is a 'verified launch' system that separates infrastructure access (permissionless) from quality signaling (curated through reputation networks). This confirms the claim's prediction that platforms need brand separation mechanisms. The verified launch layer allows MetaDAO to scale throughput while preserving reputational signaling for quality projects.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:
diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/internet capital markets compress fundraising from months to days because permissionless raises eliminate gatekeepers while futarchy replaces due diligence bottlenecks with real-time market pricing.md b/domains/internet-finance/internet capital markets compress fundraising from months to days because permissionless raises eliminate gatekeepers while futarchy replaces due diligence bottlenecks with real-time market pricing.md
index c9c640f78..c686fd676 100644
--- a/domains/internet-finance/internet capital markets compress fundraising from months to days because permissionless raises eliminate gatekeepers while futarchy replaces due diligence bottlenecks with real-time market pricing.md	
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/internet capital markets compress fundraising from months to days because permissionless raises eliminate gatekeepers while futarchy replaces due diligence bottlenecks with real-time market pricing.md	
@@ -48,6 +48,12 @@ MycoRealms demonstrates 72-hour permissionless raise window on Futardio for $125
 
 Futardio cult raised $11.4M in under 24 hours through MetaDAO's futarchy platform (launched 2026-03-03, closed 2026-03-04), confirming sub-day fundraising timelines for futarchy-governed launches. This provides concrete timing data supporting the compression thesis: traditional meme coin launches through centralized platforms typically require days to weeks for comparable capital formation.
 
+
+### Additional Evidence (extend)
+*Source: [[2026-02-00-metadao-strategic-reset-permissionless]] | Added: 2026-03-12 | Extractor: anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5*
+
+MetaDAO's revenue cadence problem demonstrates the bottleneck that permissionless infrastructure solves. Under the curated model, revenue declined sharply when launch activity slowed because each launch required manual vetting and founder relationship building. The shift to permissionless launches is explicitly described as necessary to 'increase throughput and validate platform scalability,' providing empirical evidence that curation creates the bottleneck that permissionless models eliminate.
+
 ---
 
 Relevant Notes:
diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/metadao-dao-of-daos-vision-coordinates-capital-across-futarchy-governed-entities.md b/domains/internet-finance/metadao-dao-of-daos-vision-coordinates-capital-across-futarchy-governed-entities.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..abe6e48cd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/metadao-dao-of-daos-vision-coordinates-capital-across-futarchy-governed-entities.md
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: internet-finance
+description: "MetaDAO's stated vision positions futarchy as coordination infrastructure for capital allocation across an ecosystem of market-governed entities"
+confidence: speculative
+source: "Blockworks, KuCoin, Delphi Digital summaries (Feb 2026)"
+created: 2026-03-11
+---
+
+# MetaDAO's DAO of DAOs vision positions futarchy as coordination infrastructure for capital allocation across an ecosystem of market-governed entities
+
+MetaDAO's stated vision is to become a "meta DAO"—a DAO of DAOs that coordinates capital and governance across an ecosystem of futarchy-governed entities. This positions MetaDAO as coordination infrastructure rather than a single-purpose launchpad.
+
+The vision statement includes: "Futarchy will replace C-suite decision-making" and MetaDAO will serve as the coordination layer for this ecosystem. This implies a future where multiple entities use futarchy for governance, and MetaDAO provides the shared infrastructure, liquidity, and coordination mechanisms.
+
+This is an attractor state claim: it describes a potential future equilibrium where futarchy becomes the dominant governance mechanism for crypto-native organizations, and MetaDAO captures value as the coordination layer. However, it's speculative because:
+
+1. No concrete mechanism is specified for how MetaDAO coordinates across entities
+2. No evidence that other entities are adopting futarchy at scale
+3. The value capture model for a "meta DAO" is undefined
+4. This represents MetaDAO's strategic positioning statement, not demonstrated capability
+
+The claim is worth tracking because it reveals MetaDAO's strategic positioning: not just a launchpad, but infrastructure for a new organizational paradigm.
+
+## Evidence
+
+- Vision statement: "Futarchy will replace C-suite decision-making"
+- MetaDAO described as "meta DAO"—DAO of DAOs
+- Goal: "Coordinating capital and governance across ecosystem of futarchy-governed entities"
+- Permissionless launches + verified layer described as steps toward this vision
+
+## Relationship to Attractor States
+
+This vision aligns with the attractor states framework: if futarchy proves superior for certain decision types, rational organizations will adopt it, creating network effects around shared infrastructure. MetaDAO is positioning to be that infrastructure layer.
+
+However, the vision is currently aspirational. The evidence shows MetaDAO is still solving basic problems (launch cadence, permissionless scaling) rather than coordinating a mature ecosystem.
+
+---
+
+Relevant Notes:
+- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md]]
+- [[optimal governance requires mixing mechanisms because different decisions have different manipulation risk profiles.md]]
+
+Topics:
+- [[domains/internet-finance/_map]]
+- [[core/mechanisms/_map]]
diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/metadao-revenue-cadence-problem-forces-permissionless-transition.md b/domains/internet-finance/metadao-revenue-cadence-problem-forces-permissionless-transition.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..fd9f44c87
--- /dev/null
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/metadao-revenue-cadence-problem-forces-permissionless-transition.md
@@ -0,0 +1,42 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: internet-finance
+description: "Curated launch models create feast-or-famine revenue dynamics that force platforms toward permissionless infrastructure once product-market fit is validated"
+confidence: likely
+source: "Blockworks, KuCoin, Delphi Digital summaries (Feb 2026)"
+created: 2026-03-11
+---
+
+# MetaDAO's revenue cadence problem demonstrates that curated launch models create unsustainable feast-or-famine dynamics forcing permissionless transition
+
+MetaDAO's revenue declined sharply since mid-December 2025 as ICO activity slowed, demonstrating that curated launch models cannot sustain consistent revenue. This cadence problem is the primary forcing function driving the shift to permissionless infrastructure.
+
+Since the Futarchy AMM went live (October 10, 2025), MetaDAO generated approximately $2.4M in total revenue: 60% from Futarchy AMM fees, 40% from Meteora LP positions. However, revenue is lumpy and tied to launch cadence. When launches slow, revenue collapses. The source material states: "MetaDAO has fallen short on cadence over the past few weeks" and notes that "without steady new launches, revenue can't grow."
+
+The curated model creates this dynamic because each launch requires manual vetting, founder relationship building, and quality assessment. This creates a pipeline bottleneck where selectivity throttles throughput. This is structural, not operational. Even with perfect execution, curated models face a tradeoff: quality requires selectivity, but selectivity throttles throughput. The revenue data provides empirical evidence that this tradeoff is unsustainable for a platform business model.
+
+## Evidence
+
+- Total revenue since Futarchy AMM launch (Oct 10, 2025): ~$2.4M
+- Revenue split: 60% Futarchy AMM, 40% Meteora LP position
+- Revenue declined sharply since mid-December 2025
+- Decline tracks ICO activity slowdown
+- "MetaDAO has fallen short on cadence over the past few weeks"
+- Curated model described as necessary to "validate the product" but with "clear tradeoff: without steady new launches, revenue can't grow"
+
+## Why This Matters
+
+This is not just a MetaDAO-specific problem. Any platform attempting to combine quality curation with revenue growth faces the same structural tension. The evidence here demonstrates that curation creates a revenue ceiling that forces platforms toward permissionless models once product-market fit is validated.
+
+The timing is significant: MetaDAO is making this transition after ~4 months of live operation and $2.4M in revenue. This suggests the curation phase served its purpose (validation) and the platform is now hitting the growth constraint.
+
+---
+
+Relevant Notes:
+- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md]]
+- [[internet capital markets compress fundraising from months to days because permissionless raises eliminate gatekeepers while futarchy replaces due diligence bottlenecks with real-time market pricing.md]]
+- [[futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility.md]]
+
+Topics:
+- [[domains/internet-finance/_map]]
+- [[core/mechanisms/_map]]
diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/metadao-verified-launch-mechanism-layers-reputation-trust-on-permissionless-infrastructure.md b/domains/internet-finance/metadao-verified-launch-mechanism-layers-reputation-trust-on-permissionless-infrastructure.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..1b7d57db0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/metadao-verified-launch-mechanism-layers-reputation-trust-on-permissionless-infrastructure.md
@@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: internet-finance
+description: "MetaDAO's verified launch system separates permissionless infrastructure from reputation-based quality signaling, creating a hybrid curation model"
+confidence: experimental
+source: "Blockworks, KuCoin, Delphi Digital summaries (Feb 2026)"
+created: 2026-03-11
+---
+
+# MetaDAO's verified launch mechanism layers reputation trust on permissionless infrastructure creating a hybrid curation model
+
+MetaDAO is moving from curated launches to permissionless infrastructure with a "verified launch" system layered on top. This design separates infrastructure access (permissionless) from quality signaling (curated through reputation networks).
+
+The proposed mechanism works like verification badges on social platforms: projects referred by trusted partners or well-regarded ecosystem members receive "verified" status, signaling credibility without blocking unverified projects from launching. This creates two parallel tracks—verified launches that carry reputational endorsement, and permissionless launches that anyone can initiate.
+
+This architecture solves the core tension in platform design: curated models ensure quality but throttle throughput and revenue, while permissionless models scale but dilute brand trust. The verified launch layer attempts to preserve quality signaling while removing the bottleneck.
+
+## Evidence
+
+- MetaDAO publicly debated whether to preserve curated launches or move to permissionless model (Feb 2026)
+- Current curated model "places weight on founder quality, credibility, long-term alignment" but creates revenue cadence problems
+- Proposed solution: "verified launch" system described as "like blue tick on X"
+- Projects referred by "trusted partners or well-regarded ecosystem members" receive verification
+- Permissionless launches described as "necessary experiment to increase throughput and validate platform scalability"
+
+## Mechanism Design Context
+
+This is a coordination mechanism, not just a business strategy. The verified launch layer creates a reputation graph where trust flows through referral networks. The mechanism must solve:
+
+1. **Sybil resistance**: How to prevent reputation washing through fake referrals
+2. **Incentive alignment**: Why would trusted partners stake reputation on referrals
+3. **Bootstrap problem**: How to seed the initial trust network
+
+The claim is experimental because the mechanism design details are not yet specified. We don't know how referrals are tracked, whether referrers face consequences for failed projects, or how the initial trust network is seeded.
+
+---
+
+Relevant Notes:
+- [[futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility.md]]
+- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md]]
+
+Topics:
+- [[domains/internet-finance/_map]]
+- [[core/mechanisms/_map]]
diff --git a/entities/internet-finance/metadao.md b/entities/internet-finance/metadao.md
index 9f0ae5600..e02f173c2 100644
--- a/entities/internet-finance/metadao.md
+++ b/entities/internet-finance/metadao.md
@@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ The futarchy governance protocol on Solana. Implements decision markets through
 - **2026-03** — Pine Analytics Q4 2025 quarterly report published
 
 - **2024-02-18** — [[metadao-otc-trade-pantera-capital]] failed: Pantera Capital's $50,000 OTC purchase proposal rejected by futarchy markets
+- **2026-02-00** — MetaDAO publicly debated strategic reset: moving from curated to permissionless launches with proposed 'verified launch' trust layer (reputation-based quality signaling). Revenue declined sharply since mid-December 2025 as ICO activity slowed. Total revenue since Futarchy AMM launch (Oct 10, 2025): ~$2.4M (60% AMM fees, 40% Meteora LP). Vision: become 'meta DAO' coordinating capital across ecosystem of futarchy-governed entities.
 ## Key Decisions
 | Date | Proposal | Proposer | Category | Outcome |
 |------|----------|----------|----------|---------|
diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-02-00-metadao-strategic-reset-permissionless.md b/inbox/archive/2026-02-00-metadao-strategic-reset-permissionless.md
index eeca6257d..75bb92436 100644
--- a/inbox/archive/2026-02-00-metadao-strategic-reset-permissionless.md
+++ b/inbox/archive/2026-02-00-metadao-strategic-reset-permissionless.md
@@ -7,9 +7,15 @@ date: 2026-02-00
 domain: internet-finance
 secondary_domains: []
 format: article
-status: unprocessed
+status: processed
 priority: high
 tags: [metadao, permissionless, curation, launchpad, strategic-reset, mechanism-design]
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2026-03-11
+claims_extracted: ["metadao-verified-launch-mechanism-layers-reputation-trust-on-permissionless-infrastructure.md", "metadao-revenue-cadence-problem-forces-permissionless-transition.md", "metadao-dao-of-daos-vision-coordinates-capital-across-futarchy-governed-entities.md"]
+enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale.md", "futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility.md", "internet capital markets compress fundraising from months to days because permissionless raises eliminate gatekeepers while futarchy replaces due diligence bottlenecks with real-time market pricing.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
+extraction_notes: "Extracted three claims: (1) verified launch mechanism as novel coordination design, (2) revenue cadence as empirical evidence for permissionless necessity, (3) DAO of DAOs vision as attractor state. All three claims are interconnected—the cadence problem forces permissionless transition, which requires the verified launch trust layer, which serves the broader vision of futarchy as coordination infrastructure. Enriched three existing claims with new revenue data and strategic context. Updated MetaDAO entity with timeline entry covering strategic reset discussion."
 ---
 
 ## Content
@@ -53,3 +59,9 @@ MetaDAO has publicly debated whether to preserve curated launches or move to per
 PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[Teleocap makes capital formation permissionless by letting anyone propose investment terms while AI agents evaluate debate and futarchy determines funding]]
 WHY ARCHIVED: The curated → permissionless transition with verified trust layer is a novel mechanism design. Revenue cadence problem validates why permissionless is necessary. The "DAO of DAOs" vision directly relates to MetaDAO's platform thesis.
 EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on (1) verified launch as mechanism design (reputation trust + permissionless infrastructure), (2) revenue cadence as evidence for permissionless necessity, (3) "DAO of DAOs" vision as attractor state.
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- MetaDAO total revenue since Futarchy AMM launch (Oct 10, 2025): ~$2.4M
+- Revenue split: 60% Futarchy AMM fees, 40% Meteora LP position
+- Revenue declined sharply since mid-December 2025 tracking ICO activity slowdown