diff --git a/inbox/archive/2026-03-09-metanallok-x-archive.md b/inbox/archive/2026-03-09-metanallok-x-archive.md
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..0e43205
--- /dev/null
+++ b/inbox/archive/2026-03-09-metanallok-x-archive.md
@@ -0,0 +1,58 @@
+---
+type: source
+title: "@metanallok X archive — 100 most recent tweets"
+author: "Nallok (@metanallok), co-founder MetaDAO"
+url: https://x.com/metanallok
+date: 2026-03-09
+domain: internet-finance
+format: tweet
+status: unprocessed
+tags: [metadao, futardio, mechanism-design, ownership-coins, co-founder]
+linked_set: metadao-x-landscape-2026-03
+curator_notes: |
+  MetaDAO co-founder, more operational than Proph3t. Nallok's tweets reveal
+  implementation details that don't appear in the official account or blog posts.
+  Key value: Futardio mechanism design specifics — time-based preference curves,
+  hard caps, automated processes. His comment that "Robin wanted random proposal
+  outcomes — impractical for production" shows the gap between Hanson's theory and
+  MetaDAO's pragmatic implementation. Lower public profile than Proph3t but higher
+  density of mechanism details when he does post.
+extraction_hints:
+  - "Futardio mechanism details: time-based preference, hard caps, automated process — enriches existing MetaDAO mechanism claims"
+  - "Robin Hanson theory vs MetaDAO practice gap — 'random proposal outcomes impractical for production'"
+  - "Co-founder compensation structure (2% of supply per $1B FDV increase, up to 10% at $5B) — mechanism design for team incentive alignment"
+  - "Enrichment target: 'MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets' — Nallok provides implementation details"
+  - "Potential new claim: futarchy implementations must simplify theoretical mechanisms for production use"
+priority: medium
+---
+
+# @metanallok X Archive (March 2026)
+
+## Substantive Tweets
+
+### Futardio Mechanism Design
+- Time-based preference curves in ICO participation — earlier commitment gets better allocation
+- Hard caps on individual raise amounts to prevent whale domination
+- Fully automated process — no human gatekeeping on launches
+- These are implementation details that don't appear in MetaDAO's public documentation
+
+### Theory vs Practice Gap
+- "Robin wanted random proposal outcomes — impractical for production"
+- MetaDAO deliberately simplified Hanson's original futarchy design for usability
+- Pragmatic trade-offs: theoretical optimality sacrificed for practical adoption
+- This is a important signal about how futarchy actually gets built vs how it's theorized
+
+### Team Incentive Structure
+- Proph3t/Nallok compensation: 2% of META supply per $1B FDV increase, up to 10% at $5B
+- This is itself a mechanism design statement — team compensation tied to protocol success
+- No upfront allocation, pure performance-based
+- Connects to our claims about token economics replacing management fees
+
+### Ecosystem Building
+- Engagement with Futardio launch projects
+- Technical support for teams building on MetaDAO infrastructure
+- Commentary on governance proposals with implementation perspective
+
+## Noise Filtered Out
+- Heavy engagement/reply pattern — most tweets are community interaction
+- When substantive, tends toward implementation detail over ideology (opposite of Proph3t)