epimetheus: clean queue — move 53 already-extracted sources to archive
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents
parent
d41907c6a3
commit
d89d4c72c1
55 changed files with 0 additions and 163 deletions
|
|
@ -1,52 +0,0 @@
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
type: source
|
|
||||||
source_id: 2025-03-28-futardio-proposal-should-sanctum-build-a-sanctum-mobile-app-wonder
|
|
||||||
title: "Futardio Proposal: Should Sanctum Build a Sanctum Mobile App (Wonder)?"
|
|
||||||
url: https://futarchy.substack.com/p/proposal-should-sanctum-build-a-sanctum
|
|
||||||
author: Futarchy.io / Sanctum team
|
|
||||||
date_published: 2025-03-28
|
|
||||||
date_accessed: 2025-03-28
|
|
||||||
processed_date: 2025-03-28
|
|
||||||
processed_by: knowledge-base-maintainer
|
|
||||||
claims_extracted:
|
|
||||||
- consumer-crypto-adoption-requires-apps-optimized-for-earning-and-belonging
|
|
||||||
- sanctum-wonder-mobile-app-proposal-failed-futarchy-vote-march-2025
|
|
||||||
enrichments_applied:
|
|
||||||
- futarchy-governed-DAOs-converge-on-traditional-corporate-governance-scaffolding-over-time
|
|
||||||
- optimal-governance-requires-mixing-mechanisms-for-different-decision-types
|
|
||||||
tags: [futarchy, metadao, sanctum, governance, consumer-crypto]
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Futardio Proposal: Should Sanctum Build a Sanctum Mobile App (Wonder)?
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Summary
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Proposal submitted to MetaDAO's futarchy governance mechanism asking whether Sanctum should build "Wonder" - a consumer mobile application combining social features with yield generation. The proposal framed Wonder as "Instagram meets yield" targeting mainstream users seeking earning and community participation rather than active trading.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Key Details
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **Proposer**: Sanctum team
|
|
||||||
- **Governance mechanism**: MetaDAO futarchy (CLOUD token markets)
|
|
||||||
- **Proposal date**: March 28, 2025
|
|
||||||
- **Outcome**: Failed
|
|
||||||
- **Strategic context**: Pivot from infrastructure to consumer products
|
|
||||||
- **Company context**: Sanctum raised at $3B valuation (January 2025)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Core Thesis
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Sanctum's product vision: "We believe the next wave of crypto adoption will come from apps that make earning and belonging delightful, not from better trading interfaces."
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Product Concept
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Wonder mobile app**:
|
|
||||||
- Social features + passive yield generation
|
|
||||||
- Target: mainstream users, not crypto-native traders
|
|
||||||
- Success metrics: DAU and retention vs. trading volume
|
|
||||||
- Positioning: consumer fintech meets social network
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Archival Notes
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Source processed: 2025-03-28
|
|
||||||
- Claims extracted: 2 (consumer crypto thesis, futarchy governance case study)
|
|
||||||
- Enrichments: Added context to existing futarchy mechanism claims
|
|
||||||
- Timeline note: All dates are 2025 (source created and processed same year)
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -1,31 +0,0 @@
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
type: claim
|
|
||||||
title: "Futardio Launch Delay Test Data"
|
|
||||||
description: "Test data for null-result archive extraction - no material claims"
|
|
||||||
domains:
|
|
||||||
- crypto/solana/tokens
|
|
||||||
date_claimed: 2026-02-26
|
|
||||||
date_occurred: 2026-02-26
|
|
||||||
confidence: null
|
|
||||||
status: archive
|
|
||||||
source:
|
|
||||||
- type: test_data
|
|
||||||
url: null
|
|
||||||
extraction_notes: "This is test data for validating null-result archive handling. No material claims to extract."
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Futardio Launch Delay Test Data
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This is non-material test data used to validate the extraction pipeline's handling of null-result archive content.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Launch Details
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **Token**: Futardio
|
|
||||||
- **Mint Address**: `92b2kFRVjtY4txYqvCVMjv4xuDgkL5DJ6mRkcbbcmeta`
|
|
||||||
- **Original Launch Date**: February 26, 2026
|
|
||||||
- **Status**: Delayed (test scenario)
|
|
||||||
- **Reason**: Simulated technical issues (test data)
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Extraction Notes
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This file serves as test data for the knowledge base extraction system. It contains no material claims requiring fact-checking or verification. The purpose is to demonstrate proper handling of archive material that yields null results during extraction.
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -1,39 +0,0 @@
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
type: source
|
|
||||||
source_id: 2026-02-26-futardio-launch-fitbyte
|
|
||||||
title: FutarchyDAO Launch - FitByte
|
|
||||||
url: https://futarchy.metadao.fi/launch/fitbyte
|
|
||||||
archived_date: 2026-02-26
|
|
||||||
processed_date: 2026-02-26
|
|
||||||
source_type: web
|
|
||||||
domain: internet-finance
|
|
||||||
tags:
|
|
||||||
- futarchy
|
|
||||||
- metadao
|
|
||||||
- tokenomics
|
|
||||||
- workout-to-earn
|
|
||||||
- failed-launch
|
|
||||||
claims_extracted:
|
|
||||||
- fitbyte-proposes-dual-demand-workout-to-earn-through-verified-activity-rewards-plus-paid-health-data-marketplace.md
|
|
||||||
- fitbyte-chooses-metadao-futarchy-launch-for-structural-alignment-between-data-sovereignty-protocol-and-governance-sovereignty-mechanism.md
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Summary
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
FitByte attempted to launch a workout-to-earn token via MetaDAO's futarchy mechanism on 2026-02-26. The project proposed a dual-demand tokenomics model (workout rewards + health data marketplace) and framed its choice of futarchy launch as thematically aligned with its data sovereignty mission. The launch failed dramatically, raising only $23 against a $500k target. All funds were refunded.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Key Claims Extracted
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
1. **Dual-demand tokenomics**: FitByte proposed combining workout-to-earn token emission with a paid health data marketplace to create sustainable token demand beyond speculation.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
2. **Structural alignment rationale**: FitByte chose futarchy launch mechanism based on thematic alignment between data sovereignty (protocol mission) and governance sovereignty (futarchy mechanism).
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Enrichments to Existing Claims
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **Limited trading volume in futarchy launches**: FitByte represents an extreme case - $23 raised of $500k target, providing a data point on futarchy launch failure modes.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **Ownership coins as investor protection**: FitByte's pitch explicitly framed its token structure around protecting early supporters through ownership rights rather than pure speculation.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Content
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
[Full archived page content would go here - launch announcement, tokenomics explanation, governance rationale, final results showing $23 raised and refund status]
|
|
||||||
|
|
@ -1,41 +0,0 @@
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
type: source
|
|
||||||
date: 2026-03-03
|
|
||||||
source_type: launch_announcement
|
|
||||||
url: https://twitter.com/MetaDAO/status/1764234567890
|
|
||||||
processed: 2026-03-04
|
|
||||||
---
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# Futardio Cult Launch - March 3, 2026
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Summary
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Futardio Cult launched as the first futarchy-governed meme coin on MetaDAO's platform on March 3, 2026. The launch raised $11.4M SOL in 24 hours with 228x oversubscription.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Launch Details
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **Date**: March 3, 2026
|
|
||||||
- **Platform**: MetaDAO v0.3.1
|
|
||||||
- **Token**: $CULT
|
|
||||||
- **Token Mint**: `FUTqpvhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhfhf`
|
|
||||||
- **Governance**: All decisions via futarchy markets from day one
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Funding Summary
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **Hard Cap**: 50,000 SOL
|
|
||||||
- **Total Demand**: 11.4M SOL
|
|
||||||
- **Oversubscription**: 228x
|
|
||||||
- **Raise Amount**: $11.4M USD equivalent
|
|
||||||
- **Duration**: 24 hours
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Technical Notes
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- First production deployment of futarchy governance for a meme coin
|
|
||||||
- No technical issues reported during high-volume launch period
|
|
||||||
- All governance proposals routed through prediction markets
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Community Response
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- Significant social media engagement
|
|
||||||
- Mixed reactions: excitement about futarchy experimentation vs. concerns about meme coin association
|
|
||||||
- MetaDAO team emphasized this as a stress test of platform capacity
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue