diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governed-treasury-management-uses-quarterly-performance-reviews-with-comprehensive-pnl-reporting-and-risk-scoring-frameworks.md b/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governed-treasury-management-uses-quarterly-performance-reviews-with-comprehensive-pnl-reporting-and-risk-scoring-frameworks.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..2ba767e45
--- /dev/null
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governed-treasury-management-uses-quarterly-performance-reviews-with-comprehensive-pnl-reporting-and-risk-scoring-frameworks.md
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: internet-finance
+description: "IslandDAO's Dean's List treasury demonstrates futarchy governing operational mandates through quarterly accountability cycles with quantitative risk frameworks and performance-based compensation"
+confidence: experimental
+source: "IslandDAO Dean's List Treasury Proposal, futard.io, 2024-10-10"
+created: 2024-10-24
+---
+
+# Futarchy-governed treasury management uses quarterly performance reviews with comprehensive PNL reporting and risk-scoring frameworks
+
+IslandDAO's Dean's List treasury proposal (passed 2024-10-10, completed 2024-10-14) demonstrates futarchy governing complex operational mandates beyond simple binary decisions. The proposal combines conditional market approval (3% TWAP requirement) with traditional treasury management accountability structures, establishing a reserve funded by 2.5% of USDC payments managed through quarterly performance cycles.
+
+The treasury manager (Kai) must submit comprehensive quarterly reports including:
+- **PNL breakdown:** Gains or losses incurred during the quarter
+- **Strategy success rates:** Evaluation of implemented strategies and effectiveness
+- **Future proposals:** Recommendations for new strategies based on market conditions and community feedback
+
+The proposal introduces a quantitative risk-scoring framework where assets are evaluated on a 0-1 scale:
+
+$$Rs = (w_1 \cdot \text{Volatility}) + (w_2 \cdot \text{Liquidity Risk}) + (w_3 \cdot \text{Market Cap Risk}) + (w_4 \cdot \text{Historical Drawdown Risk})$$
+
+With weights: Volatility (0.4), Liquidity Risk (0.2), Market Cap Risk (0.3), Drawdown Risk (0.1). Assets with Rs ≤ 0.5 are classified as risky; Rs ≥ 0.5 as safer.
+
+Portfolio allocation follows an 80/20 split between safe assets (80%) and risky assets (20%). New asset proposals must demonstrate ability to: (1) increase overall returns, (2) offer diversification, or (3) replace existing assets with lower risk scores.
+
+Compensation is performance-based: 5% of quarterly profits vest over 3 months, creating alignment without upfront dilution. The treasury is held in a Mango Delegate Account via Realms, with potential diversification into USDY (yield-bearing USD) and JLP (Jupiter Liquidity Pools).
+
+The proposal passed with a 3% TWAP requirement (target market cap 539k USDC from 523k baseline, target $DEAN price 0.005383 USDC from 0.005227 baseline), demonstrating that futarchy can enforce performance requirements for ongoing operational roles, not just one-time decisions.
+
+## Evidence
+- IslandDAO Dean's List Treasury Proposal passed 2024-10-10 with quarterly review structure, risk scoring framework (Rs formula with weighted volatility, liquidity, market cap, drawdown factors), 80/20 safe/risky asset split, and 5% performance fee on quarterly profits
+- Proposal completed 2024-10-14 after meeting 3% TWAP threshold, showing futarchy can enforce performance requirements beyond simple pass/fail
+- First quarter deliverables include defining "rainy day" scenarios, producing treasury reports with expected return calculations, Sharpe ratios, maximum drawdown analysis, and risk management summaries
+- Proposal notes that "the risk score (Rs) in this proposal is based on early calculations and methods that are still being worked on" and current numbers "might not show all important risk factors yet," indicating the framework is experimental
+
+## Limitations
+The risk-scoring framework is explicitly acknowledged as incomplete and under development. The proposal represents a single implementation case; generalizability to other futarchy-governed treasuries is not yet established.
+
+---
+
+Related:
+- [[MetaDAOs-futarchy-implementation-shows-limited-trading-volume-in-uncontested-decisions.md]]
+- [[futarchy-governed-DAOs-converge-on-traditional-corporate-governance-scaffolding-for-treasury-operations-because-market-mechanisms-alone-cannot-provide-operational-security-and-legal-compliance.md]]
+- [[optimal-governance-requires-mixing-mechanisms-because-different-decisions-have-different-manipulation-risk-profiles.md]]
diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/performance-based-treasury-compensation-with-quarterly-vesting-creates-alignment-without-upfront-dilution-in-futarchy-governed-daos.md b/domains/internet-finance/performance-based-treasury-compensation-with-quarterly-vesting-creates-alignment-without-upfront-dilution-in-futarchy-governed-daos.md
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..68dfb9b7f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/domains/internet-finance/performance-based-treasury-compensation-with-quarterly-vesting-creates-alignment-without-upfront-dilution-in-futarchy-governed-daos.md
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+---
+type: claim
+domain: internet-finance
+description: "IslandDAO's 5% quarterly profit fee with 3-month vesting demonstrates performance-based compensation structure for futarchy-governed treasury managers"
+confidence: experimental
+source: "IslandDAO Dean's List Treasury Proposal, futard.io, 2024-10-10"
+created: 2024-10-24
+---
+
+# Performance-based treasury compensation with quarterly vesting creates alignment without upfront dilution in futarchy-governed DAOs
+
+IslandDAO's Dean's List treasury proposal implements a compensation structure where the treasury manager receives 5% of quarterly profits, distributed through 3-month vesting contracts created at the end of each quarter. This structure differs from traditional token grants by tying compensation to realized outcomes rather than time-based lockups.
+
+The mechanism addresses a key alignment problem: standard time-based vesting is hedgeable because token holders can short-sell to neutralize lockup exposure while appearing locked. Performance-based compensation cannot be hedged in the same way because the compensation amount is unknown until quarterly results are measured. The manager cannot predict or lock in the payout value at grant time.
+
+The structure creates two accountability layers:
+
+1. **Quarterly measurement:** At the end of each quarter, the treasury manager must submit comprehensive performance reports including PNL breakdown, strategy success rates, and future proposals for community review.
+
+2. **Vesting lockup:** The 3-month vesting period provides sufficient medium-term exposure to consequences of decisions without creating multi-year illiquidity that would force the manager to remain in the role regardless of performance.
+
+This differs from traditional fund management where carried interest accrues over multi-year fund lifecycles with limited interim accountability. The quarterly cycle enables the DAO to evaluate whether to continue the arrangement or replace the manager based on demonstrated results.
+
+The proposal passed futarchy governance with a 3% TWAP requirement, demonstrating that conditional markets can evaluate not just the compensation structure itself but the broader treasury management mandate it supports.
+
+## Evidence
+- IslandDAO treasury proposal specifies: "Performance fee: 5% of the treasury's quarterly profit. At the end of each quarter, a 3-month vesting contract will be created, totaling 5% of the treasury's profits for the previous quarter"
+- Quarterly performance reports required include PNL breakdown, strategy success rates, and future proposals, creating regular evaluation points
+- Proposal passed 2024-10-10, completed 2024-10-14 after meeting TWAP threshold
+- Treasury manager (Kai) role is "subject to a quarterly review" with community input on future proposals
+
+## Limitations
+This represents a single implementation case. The effectiveness of this compensation structure in preventing manager misalignment or ensuring long-term performance is not yet demonstrated. The proposal does not specify consequences for poor performance or mechanisms for manager replacement.
+
+---
+
+Related:
+- [[performance-unlocked-team-tokens-with-price-multiple-triggers-and-twap-settlement-create-long-term-alignment-without-initial-dilution.md]]
+- [[futarchy-governed-treasury-management-uses-quarterly-performance-reviews-with-comprehensive-pnl-reporting-and-risk-scoring-frameworks.md]]
diff --git a/inbox/archive/2024-10-10-futardio-proposal-treasury-proposal-deans-list-proposal.md b/inbox/archive/2024-10-10-futardio-proposal-treasury-proposal-deans-list-proposal.md
index 4472f4232..c1126a7d6 100644
--- a/inbox/archive/2024-10-10-futardio-proposal-treasury-proposal-deans-list-proposal.md
+++ b/inbox/archive/2024-10-10-futardio-proposal-treasury-proposal-deans-list-proposal.md
@@ -6,9 +6,15 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/8SwPfzKhaZ2SQfgfJYfeVRTXALZs2qyFj7kX1dEkd29
 date: 2024-10-10
 domain: internet-finance
 format: data
-status: unprocessed
+status: processed
 tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
 event_type: proposal
+processed_by: rio
+processed_date: 2024-10-10
+claims_extracted: ["futarchy-governed-treasury-management-uses-quarterly-performance-reviews-with-comprehensive-pnl-reporting-and-risk-scoring-frameworks.md", "performance-based-treasury-compensation-with-quarterly-vesting-creates-alignment-without-upfront-dilution-in-futarchy-governed-daos.md"]
+enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAOs-futarchy-implementation-shows-limited-trading-volume-in-uncontested-decisions.md", "futarchy-governed-DAOs-converge-on-traditional-corporate-governance-scaffolding-for-treasury-operations-because-market-mechanisms-alone-cannot-provide-operational-security-and-legal-compliance.md", "optimal-governance-requires-mixing-mechanisms-because-different-decisions-have-different-manipulation-risk-profiles.md"]
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
+extraction_notes: "Extracted two new claims about futarchy-governed treasury operations and performance-based compensation structures. Enriched three existing claims with evidence of operational futarchy implementation. Source demonstrates futarchy governing complex ongoing mandates (treasury management) rather than simple binary decisions, with traditional governance scaffolding (quarterly reviews, risk frameworks) operating within futarchy-approved parameters."
 ---
 
 ## Proposal Details
@@ -131,3 +137,16 @@ Target \$DEAN Price: 0.005383 USDC
 - Autocrat version: 0.3
 - Completed: 2024-10-14
 - Ended: 2024-10-14
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- IslandDAO Dean's List Treasury Proposal passed 2024-10-10, completed 2024-10-14
+- Proposal account: 8SwPfzKhaZ2SQfgfJYfeVRTXALZs2qyFj7kX1dEkd29h
+- Treasury reserve funded by 2.5% of USDC payments to DAO
+- Current MCAP: 523k USDC, Target MCAP: 539k USDC (3% TWAP requirement)
+- Current $DEAN Price: 0.005227 USDC, Target $DEAN Price: 0.005383 USDC
+- Treasury held in Mango Delegate Account via Realms
+- Risk score formula: Rs = (0.4 × Volatility) + (0.2 × Liquidity Risk) + (0.3 × Market Cap Risk) + (0.1 × Historical Drawdown Risk)
+- Portfolio allocation: 80% safe assets (Rs ≥ 0.5), 20% risky assets (Rs < 0.5)
+- Treasury manager: Kai (@DeFi_Kai)
+- Performance fee: 5% of quarterly profits with 3-month vesting