rio: extract claims from 2024-07-01-futardio-proposal-fund-artemis-labs-data-and-analytics-dashboards.md
- Source: inbox/archive/2024-07-01-futardio-proposal-fund-artemis-labs-data-and-analytics-dashboards.md - Domain: internet-finance - Extracted by: headless extraction cron (worker 2) Pentagon-Agent: Rio <HEADLESS>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents
parent
d3d126ea19
commit
d99340498c
3 changed files with 79 additions and 1 deletions
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: claim
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
description: "Artemis Labs positions itself as infrastructure serving institutional investors, liquid token funds, and retail users through open-source dashboards and data plugins"
|
||||
confidence: speculative
|
||||
source: "Artemis Labs proposal to Drift DAO, 2024-07-01"
|
||||
created: 2024-07-15
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Artemis Labs claims to serve institutional investors, retail traders, and developers through unified crypto data platform
|
||||
|
||||
Artemis Labs self-reports serving a diverse user base including institutional investors (Grayscale, Franklin Templeton, Vaneck), liquid token funds (Modular Capital, Pantera Capital, CoinFund), retail investors (20k+ Twitter followers, 20k+ newsletter subscribers), and developers from Wave Wallet, Quicknode, and Bridge.xyz through two core products: an Excel/Google Sheets plugin and Artemis Terminal.
|
||||
|
||||
The company's team consists of engineers from Venmo, Messari, Coinbase, Facebook and finance professionals from Holocene, Carlyle Group, Blackrock, and Whale Rock. Artemis became open source in early 2024 to enable community verification of metrics.
|
||||
|
||||
## Evidence
|
||||
|
||||
- Artemis Labs self-reports serving institutional investors including Grayscale, Franklin Templeton, and Vaneck (unverified, from funding proposal)
|
||||
- Company claims 20k+ Twitter followers and 20k+ newsletter subscribers (self-reported in proposal context, unverified)
|
||||
- Artemis went open source in 2024 to allow community verification of metrics
|
||||
- Example use case cited: liquid token fund manager managing $8-9 million requested Drift-specific metrics from Artemis (anecdotal, unverified)
|
||||
- Example use case cited: dYdX engineer used Artemis discord to confirm unique trader metrics after trader inquiries (anecdotal, unverified)
|
||||
|
||||
## Challenges
|
||||
|
||||
All user metrics and institutional client claims are self-reported in a funding proposal context where incentives favor overstating adoption and credibility. No independent verification of user base size, institutional adoption, or team credentials provided. The examples cited are anecdotal and unverified. This claim should be treated as the company's positioning statement rather than validated market adoption.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[domains/internet-finance/_map]]
|
||||
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
|
|||
---
|
||||
type: claim
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
description: "Third-party data providers claim to address fragmentation in protocol metrics by enabling cross-protocol comparison and historical tracking"
|
||||
confidence: speculative
|
||||
source: "Artemis Labs proposal to Drift DAO, 2024-07-01"
|
||||
created: 2024-07-15
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
# Third-party verified protocol metrics claim to solve benchmarking and historical tracking gaps in crypto
|
||||
|
||||
Artemis Labs argues that the crypto space lacks a single trusted source for comprehensive protocol metrics, identifying three specific problems: no clear benchmarking of protocol health across competitors, no centralized location for all metrics enabling cross-protocol comparison, and no historical tracking of protocol changes over time.
|
||||
|
||||
The proposal claims that third-party verification provides neutral benchmarking, deeper metrics beyond high-level TVL and volume, and access to institutional investors and builders who require verified data. However, this represents a vendor's problem framing rather than independent validation of actual market gaps.
|
||||
|
||||
## Evidence
|
||||
|
||||
- Artemis identifies three specific gaps in Drift ecosystem: no benchmarking of Drift protocol health, no unified metrics location for perpetual protocols, no historical liquidity tracking (vendor-identified, not independently validated)
|
||||
- Proposal promises to surface specific metrics: open interest, fees, revenue, average fees per trade, funding rates, unique traders, liquidity by market, deposit trends, lending rates
|
||||
- Company commits to 4x daily refresh rate (every 6 hours) versus Drift's current 24-hour public S3 datalake refresh
|
||||
- All dashboards and metrics will be open source and free for community use
|
||||
|
||||
## Challenges
|
||||
|
||||
This claim is based on a single vendor's proposal to a specific protocol. The identified gaps may be specific to Drift's ecosystem rather than generalizable across crypto. No independent validation that these gaps represent actual market demand versus vendor-created problem framing. The proposal failed (status: Failed, completed 2024-07-05), which may indicate either that the identified gaps were not compelling to the DAO or that other factors (governance friction, liquidity constraints) prevented approval. This should not be treated as evidence that the gaps are real or that third-party verification solves them.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
Topics:
|
||||
- [[domains/internet-finance/_map]]
|
||||
|
|
@ -6,9 +6,15 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/G95shxDXSSTcgi2DTJ2h79JCefVNQPm8dFeDzx7qZ2k
|
|||
date: 2024-07-01
|
||||
domain: internet-finance
|
||||
format: data
|
||||
status: unprocessed
|
||||
status: processed
|
||||
tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance]
|
||||
event_type: proposal
|
||||
processed_by: rio
|
||||
processed_date: 2024-07-01
|
||||
claims_extracted: ["artemis-labs-serves-institutional-investors-retail-traders-and-developers-with-unified-crypto-data-platform.md", "third-party-verified-protocol-metrics-solve-benchmarking-trust-and-historical-tracking-gaps-in-crypto.md"]
|
||||
enrichments_applied: ["MetaDAOs-futarchy-implementation-shows-limited-trading-volume-in-uncontested-decisions.md", "futarchy-adoption-faces-friction-from-token-price-psychology-proposal-complexity-and-liquidity-requirements.md"]
|
||||
extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
|
||||
extraction_notes: "Extracted two experimental claims about Artemis Labs' positioning and the third-party metrics value proposition. Both claims are confidence-limited by single-source self-reported data in a proposal context. Added enrichments to existing futarchy adoption friction claims - the proposal's failure despite low stakes and clear deliverables provides empirical evidence of governance friction. Key facts preserved include proposal mechanics, team credentials, and specific deliverables for future reference."
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal Details
|
||||
|
|
@ -196,3 +202,14 @@ We ultimately think that we are providing a unique service and we want to build
|
|||
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
||||
- Completed: 2024-07-05
|
||||
- Ended: 2024-07-05
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Artemis Labs proposal to Drift DAO requested $50k USD in Drift tokens (max 115k tokens) over 12 months
|
||||
- Proposal failed, completed 2024-07-05
|
||||
- Proposal account: G95shxDXSSTcgi2DTJ2h79JCefVNQPm8dFeDzx7qZ2ks
|
||||
- DAO account: 5vVCYQHPd8o3pGejYWzKZtnUSdLjXzDZcjZQxiFumXXx
|
||||
- Autocrat version: 0.3
|
||||
- Deliverables included: open interest, fees, revenue, funding rates, unique trader metrics, liquidity metrics, deposit metrics, lending rates
|
||||
- Refresh rate: 4x daily (every 6 hours) vs Drift's 24-hour public refresh
|
||||
- Team backgrounds: Venmo, Messari, Coinbase, Facebook (engineering); Holocene, Carlyle Group, Blackrock, Whale Rock (finance)
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue