auto-fix: strip 7 broken wiki links
Pipeline auto-fixer: removed [[ ]] brackets from links that don't resolve to existing claims in the knowledge base.
This commit is contained in:
parent
c03750ff31
commit
dd3e012399
6 changed files with 7 additions and 7 deletions
|
|
@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ Behavioral health needs are increasing, and traditional individual-focused treat
|
|||
|
||||
**KB connections:**
|
||||
- Connects to: [[the mental health supply gap is widening not closing because demand outpaces workforce growth and technology primarily serves the already-served rather than expanding access]] — consistent
|
||||
- Connects to: [[social isolation costs Medicare 7 billion annually...]] — population-level social connection interventions address this
|
||||
- Connects to: social isolation costs Medicare 7 billion annually... — population-level social connection interventions address this
|
||||
- Cross-domain (Clay): The volunteer ambassador + stigma-reduction approach is a narrative intervention, not a clinical one. Health outcomes at scale require cultural/narrative infrastructure change — this is evidence for the Clay-Vida connection
|
||||
- Connects to SDOH ROI claims and VBC transition
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -67,6 +67,6 @@ Behavioral health needs are increasing, and traditional individual-focused treat
|
|||
- The community ambassador model is a claim candidate at speculative/experimental confidence: "Community volunteer mental health ambassadors and narrative stigma-reduction campaigns represent a non-clinical delivery channel for population-level behavioral health intervention"
|
||||
|
||||
## Curator Notes (structured handoff for extractor)
|
||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[the mental health supply gap is widening not closing...]] — enriches with population-level intervention framework
|
||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: the mental health supply gap is widening not closing... — enriches with population-level intervention framework
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: AHA's 2026 population behavioral health strategy framework documents what's being attempted at scale. The technology-for-engagement (not access) finding is consistent with existing KB claims and worth reinforcing.
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Don't extract the general framework. Focus on: (1) technology serves engagement not access expansion — explicit confirmation; (2) community ambassador model as non-clinical behavioral health delivery; (3) measurement-based care as the 2026 standard for behavioral health survival under payer scrutiny.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ Published January 2026 by the ARISE network (Stanford-Harvard Clinical AI Resear
|
|||
**Context:** ARISE (AI Research in Systems Engineering) network spans Stanford and Harvard Medical School. Report covers 2025 clinical AI research — most recent comprehensive synthesis available as of April 2026.
|
||||
|
||||
## Curator Notes (structured handoff for extractor)
|
||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[human-in-the-loop clinical AI degrades to worse-than-AI-alone...]] and Belief 5 (clinical AI novel safety risks)
|
||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: human-in-the-loop clinical AI degrades to worse-than-AI-alone... and Belief 5 (clinical AI novel safety risks)
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Most comprehensive 2026 state-of-the-field synthesis. The generational divergence finding (33% younger vs 11% older deskilling concern) is new quantitative evidence on temporal risk distribution.
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Focus on the temporal qualification — current clinicians not experiencing deskilling now because pre-AI trained; future risk is for trainees. This nuance is missing from existing KB claims. Also extract: upskilling requires deliberate design, not passive AI exposure.
|
||||
flagged_for_theseus: ["Generational risk divergence in clinical AI deskilling mirrors general AI displacement pattern — older workers protected by pre-AI skills, younger workers face structural displacement risk"]
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -57,6 +57,6 @@ Two related regulatory developments that extend the KB's existing claim about FD
|
|||
- NOTE: The technology is not yet ready to fully replace; the policy is moving ahead of scientific readiness. This creates a potential confidence calibration issue.
|
||||
|
||||
## Curator Notes (structured handoff for extractor)
|
||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[FDA is replacing animal testing with AI models and organ-on-chip as the default preclinical pathway...]] — enrichment, not new claim
|
||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: FDA is replacing animal testing with AI models and organ-on-chip as the default preclinical pathway... — enrichment, not new claim
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: FDA Modernization Act 3.0 (December 2025, Senate unanimous consent) and December 2025 draft guidance are regulatory milestones that update the claim's evidence base and timeline precision.
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Enrich the existing claim rather than create a new one. The key enrichment: (1) December 2025 draft guidance on nonhuman primates, (2) FDA Modernization Act 3.0 formal pathway, (3) "hybrid model" qualifier — alternatives complement rather than replace animal studies currently.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ AI should "augment clinical reasoning, improve diagnostic accuracy, support tria
|
|||
**Context:** Frontiers in Medicine is a legitimate peer-reviewed journal. The paper appears to be a perspective/review piece rather than a primary empirical study — important for evidence quality assessment.
|
||||
|
||||
## Curator Notes (structured handoff for extractor)
|
||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[human-in-the-loop clinical AI degrades to worse-than-AI-alone...]] — adds moral deskilling as new mechanism
|
||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: human-in-the-loop clinical AI degrades to worse-than-AI-alone... — adds moral deskilling as new mechanism
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: Introduces moral deskilling concept — ethical judgment erosion from AI reliance. New safety risk category not yet in KB.
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: Treat moral deskilling as experimental/speculative (no empirical studies yet — conceptual framing only). Don't conflate with the higher-confidence diagnostic deskilling evidence. But flag as a genuine new category worth a claim candidate at experimental confidence.
|
||||
flagged_for_theseus: ["Moral deskilling from AI habituation is an alignment failure mode: AI systematically shapes human ethical judgment through repeated exposure, potentially at scale across clinical systems"]
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ No completed Phase 2 RCT for GLP-1 + OUD as of April 2026. This is the definitiv
|
|||
|
||||
**KB connections:**
|
||||
- Directly extends: Sessions 26-27 GLP-1 reward circuit thread
|
||||
- Connects to: [[GLP-1 receptor agonists are the largest therapeutic category launch...]] — OUD application would significantly extend the therapeutic scope
|
||||
- Connects to: GLP-1 receptor agonists are the largest therapeutic category launch... — OUD application would significantly extend the therapeutic scope
|
||||
- If results are positive, would extend the "shared VTA dopamine mechanism" claim from AUD to OUD
|
||||
- Potentially relevant to addiction epidemiology / deaths of despair claims
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -68,6 +68,6 @@ The paper's main finding (mortality declines during recession) is DISTINCT from
|
|||
- Don't overstate implication for Belief 1 — this paper addresses a different mechanism than Belief 1's core compounding failure claim
|
||||
|
||||
## Curator Notes (structured handoff for extractor)
|
||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: [[Americas declining life expectancy is driven by deaths of despair...]] and Belief 1 (healthspan as binding constraint)
|
||||
PRIMARY CONNECTION: Americas declining life expectancy is driven by deaths of despair... and Belief 1 (healthspan as binding constraint)
|
||||
WHY ARCHIVED: QJE-quality empirical paper documenting the recession-mortality paradox through pollution mechanism. Useful for nuancing the health/economy relationship claims.
|
||||
EXTRACTION HINT: If extracting a claim, focus narrowly on the mechanism: "Economic downturns reduce pollution-related mortality primarily in elderly populations through air quality improvement, while simultaneously increasing deaths of despair among working-age populations." Two opposite effects, one recession. The net welfare calculation is complex.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in a new issue