From de0f01675c45bbcc464477a83d6ab2e4e9c273ff Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Teleo Agents Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 12:37:47 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] extract: 2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content Pentagon-Agent: Ganymede --- ...adeoff-between-adoption-and-credibility.md | 6 ++++++ ...eliminates-long-term-tradeoff-ambiguity.md | 6 ++++++ ...-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content.md | 19 ++++++++++++++++++- 3 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governed-memecoin-launchpads-face-reputational-risk-tradeoff-between-adoption-and-credibility.md b/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governed-memecoin-launchpads-face-reputational-risk-tradeoff-between-adoption-and-credibility.md index 7b18344b..a5cf045a 100644 --- a/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governed-memecoin-launchpads-face-reputational-risk-tradeoff-between-adoption-and-credibility.md +++ b/domains/internet-finance/futarchy-governed-memecoin-launchpads-face-reputational-risk-tradeoff-between-adoption-and-credibility.md @@ -27,6 +27,12 @@ From the MetaDAO proposal: This claim extends futarchy-governed-permissionless-launches-require-brand-separation-to-manage-reputational-liability-because-failed-projects-on-a-curated-platform-damage-the-platforms-credibility by showing the reputational concern operates at the mechanism level, not just the platform level. The market's rejection of Futardio suggests futarchy stakeholders prioritize mechanism credibility over short-term adoption metrics. + +### Additional Evidence (confirm) +*Source: [[2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content]] | Added: 2026-03-16* + +Futardio proposal lists 'Makes futarchy look less serious' and 'May make it harder to sell DeFi DAOs / non-crypto organizations' as explicit potential pitfalls, demonstrating MetaDAO's awareness of the reputational risk tradeoff when associating futarchy with memecoin infrastructure. + --- Relevant Notes: diff --git a/domains/internet-finance/memecoin-governance-is-ideal-futarchy-use-case-because-single-objective-function-eliminates-long-term-tradeoff-ambiguity.md b/domains/internet-finance/memecoin-governance-is-ideal-futarchy-use-case-because-single-objective-function-eliminates-long-term-tradeoff-ambiguity.md index 6135cc2b..9a10e215 100644 --- a/domains/internet-finance/memecoin-governance-is-ideal-futarchy-use-case-because-single-objective-function-eliminates-long-term-tradeoff-ambiguity.md +++ b/domains/internet-finance/memecoin-governance-is-ideal-futarchy-use-case-because-single-objective-function-eliminates-long-term-tradeoff-ambiguity.md @@ -34,6 +34,12 @@ This claim complements [[coin price is the fairest objective function for asset MetaDAO's Futardio proposal explicitly states: 'One of the ideal use-cases for futarchy is memecoin governance. This is because memecoin holders only want the price of the token to increase. There's no question of "maybe the market knows what's the best short-term action, but not the best long-term action."' This provides direct confirmation from MetaDAO itself that memecoins eliminate the temporal tradeoff problem that complicates futarchy in other contexts. + +### Additional Evidence (confirm) +*Source: [[2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content]] | Added: 2026-03-16* + +MetaDAO proposal explicitly identifies memecoins as 'ideal use-case for futarchy' because 'memecoin holders only want the price of the token to increase. There's no question of maybe the market knows what's the best short-term action, but not the best long-term action.' This confirms the single-objective-function argument with direct reasoning from practitioners. + --- Relevant Notes: diff --git a/inbox/archive/2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content.md b/inbox/archive/2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content.md index 715eabdd..9a62c43d 100644 --- a/inbox/archive/2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content.md +++ b/inbox/archive/2024-08-28-futardio-proposal-test-proposal-based-on-metadao-content.md @@ -6,9 +6,13 @@ url: "https://www.futard.io/proposal/EmPUGgv2Utzuu2vgSu6GcTRAtJMox5vJeZKi95cBgfJ date: 2024-08-28 domain: internet-finance format: data -status: unprocessed +status: enrichment tags: [futardio, metadao, futarchy, solana, governance] event_type: proposal +processed_by: rio +processed_date: 2026-03-16 +enrichments_applied: ["memecoin-governance-is-ideal-futarchy-use-case-because-single-objective-function-eliminates-long-term-tradeoff-ambiguity.md", "futarchy-governed-memecoin-launchpads-face-reputational-risk-tradeoff-between-adoption-and-credibility.md"] +extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5" --- ## Proposal Details @@ -352,3 +356,16 @@ This would all be left to the discretion of the team building it, but they would - Autocrat version: 0.3 - Completed: 2024-09-01 - Ended: 2024-09-01 + + +## Key Facts +- MetaDAO futardio proposal was proposal #8 on the platform +- Proposal was created 2024-08-28 and failed 2024-09-01 +- Proposed $100k grant over 6 months to fund development team +- Target launch was Q3 (presumably 2024) +- Futardio would allocate percentage of each new memecoin supply to futarchy DAO +- Points system would convert to $FUTA token within 180 days +- Revenue distribution would go to vault claimable by FUTA holders +- Platform would be immutable with open-source verifiable program +- Website deployment planned for IPFS or Arweave +- Nallok and Proph3t would support but not be core team