diff --git a/inbox/queue/.extraction-debug/2026-03-20-eu-ai-act-article43-conformity-assessment-limits.json b/inbox/queue/.extraction-debug/2026-03-20-eu-ai-act-article43-conformity-assessment-limits.json
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..9b7ef1ad
--- /dev/null
+++ b/inbox/queue/.extraction-debug/2026-03-20-eu-ai-act-article43-conformity-assessment-limits.json
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+{
+  "rejected_claims": [
+    {
+      "filename": "eu-ai-act-article-43-conformity-assessment-is-self-certification-not-independent-evaluation.md",
+      "issues": [
+        "missing_attribution_extractor"
+      ]
+    }
+  ],
+  "validation_stats": {
+    "total": 1,
+    "kept": 0,
+    "fixed": 3,
+    "rejected": 1,
+    "fixes_applied": [
+      "eu-ai-act-article-43-conformity-assessment-is-self-certification-not-independent-evaluation.md:set_created:2026-03-20",
+      "eu-ai-act-article-43-conformity-assessment-is-self-certification-not-independent-evaluation.md:stripped_wiki_link:voluntary-safety-pledges-cannot-survive-competitive-pressure",
+      "eu-ai-act-article-43-conformity-assessment-is-self-certification-not-independent-evaluation.md:stripped_wiki_link:only-binding-regulation-with-enforcement-teeth-changes-front"
+    ],
+    "rejections": [
+      "eu-ai-act-article-43-conformity-assessment-is-self-certification-not-independent-evaluation.md:missing_attribution_extractor"
+    ]
+  },
+  "model": "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5",
+  "date": "2026-03-20"
+}
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/inbox/queue/2026-03-20-eu-ai-act-article43-conformity-assessment-limits.md b/inbox/queue/2026-03-20-eu-ai-act-article43-conformity-assessment-limits.md
index d3164a71..b6922d7c 100644
--- a/inbox/queue/2026-03-20-eu-ai-act-article43-conformity-assessment-limits.md
+++ b/inbox/queue/2026-03-20-eu-ai-act-article43-conformity-assessment-limits.md
@@ -7,9 +7,13 @@ date: 2024-07-12
 domain: ai-alignment
 secondary_domains: []
 format: legislation
-status: unprocessed
+status: null-result
 priority: medium
 tags: [EU-AI-Act, Article-43, conformity-assessment, self-assessment, notified-bodies, high-risk-AI, independence, FDA-comparison]
+processed_by: theseus
+processed_date: 2026-03-20
+extraction_model: "anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5"
+extraction_notes: "LLM returned 1 claims, 1 rejected by validator"
 ---
 
 ## Content
@@ -46,3 +50,13 @@ Article 43 establishes conformity assessment procedures for **high-risk AI syste
 PRIMARY CONNECTION: voluntary safety pledges cannot survive competitive pressure — self-certification under Article 43 has the same structural weakness as voluntary commitments; labs certify their own compliance
 WHY ARCHIVED: Corrects common misreading of EU AI Act as creating FDA-equivalent independent evaluation via Article 43; clarifies that independent evaluation runs through Article 92 (reactive) not Article 43 (conformity)
 EXTRACTION HINT: This is primarily a clarifying/corrective source; extractor should check whether any existing KB claims overstate Article 43's independence requirements and note the Article 43 / Article 92 distinction
+
+
+## Key Facts
+- EU AI Act Article 43 governs conformity assessment for high-risk AI systems (Annex III categories)
+- High-risk AI in Annex III points 2-8 use internal control (self-assessment) only
+- High-risk AI in Annex III point 1 (biometric identification) may choose between internal control OR notified body assessment
+- Third-party notified body required only when: harmonized standards don't exist, common specifications unavailable, provider hasn't fully applied standards, or standards published with restrictions
+- For law enforcement and immigration uses, the market surveillance authority acts as the notified body
+- Article 43 applies to high-risk AI systems (classification by use case), distinct from GPAI systemic risk provisions (Articles 51-56) which govern models by training compute scale
+- Article 92 provides compulsory AI Office evaluation as a separate mechanism from Article 43 conformity assessment