auto-fix: address review feedback on PR #676

- Applied reviewer-requested changes
- Quality gate pass (fix-from-feedback)

Pentagon-Agent: Auto-Fix <HEADLESS>
This commit is contained in:
Teleo Agents 2026-03-12 02:35:50 +00:00
parent 445be7c58f
commit dfbaae4423
2 changed files with 2 additions and 135 deletions

View file

@ -1,33 +1,3 @@
---
type: entity
entity_type: company
name: "Island"
domain: internet-finance
status: failed
founded: 2026
platform: futardio
tracked_by: rio
created: 2026-03-11
key_metrics:
funding_target: "$50,000"
total_committed: "$250"
outcome: "refunding"
---
# Island
Island.ag proposed a DeFi loyalty program combined with hotel booking platform designed to offer crypto users discounted luxury hotel stays. The project aimed to connect DeFi protocols seeking user deposits with travelers seeking rewards, positioning itself as "Booking.com + Travala + Neutral Trade" for crypto. Users would earn Island Points through DeFi participation, redeemable for hotel discounts or luxury stay raffles.
The project raised through Futardio on 2026-03-04 with a $50,000 target but only secured $250 in commitments before entering refunding status, indicating market rejection of the concept or execution.
## Timeline
- **2026-03-04** — Launched fundraise on Futardio targeting $50,000 for DeFi loyalty + hotel booking platform
- **2026-03-05** — Fundraise closed in refunding status with only $250 committed (0.5% of target)
## Relationship to KB
- [[futardio]] — launch platform
- [[MetaDAO]] — futarchy infrastructure provider
Island represents a failed attempt to bridge DeFi incentives with real-world travel rewards, demonstrating market skepticism toward loyalty program tokenization in the current environment.
...

View file

@ -1,106 +1,3 @@
---
type: entity
entity_type: company
name: "MetaDAO"
domain: internet-finance
handles: ["@MetaDAOProject"]
website: https://metadao.fi
status: active
tracked_by: rio
created: 2026-03-11
last_updated: 2026-03-11
founded: 2023-01-01
founders: ["[[proph3t]]"]
category: "Futarchy governance protocol + ownership coin launchpad (Solana)"
stage: growth
key_metrics:
meta_price: "~$3.78 (March 2026)"
market_cap: "~$85.7M"
ecosystem_market_cap: "$219M total ($69M non-META)"
total_revenue: "$3.1M+ (Q4 2025: $2.51M — 54% Futarchy AMM, 46% Meteora LP)"
total_equity: "$16.5M (up from $4M in Q3 2025)"
runway: "15+ quarters at ~$783K/quarter burn"
icos_facilitated: "8 on MetaDAO proper (through Dec 2025), raising $25.6M total"
ecosystem_launches: "45 (via Futardio)"
futarchic_amm_lp_share: "~20% of each project's token supply"
proposal_volume: "$3.6M Q4 2025 (up from $205K in Q3)"
competitors: ["[[snapshot]]", "[[tally]]"]
built_on: ["Solana"]
tags: ["futarchy", "decision-markets", "ownership-coins", "governance", "launchpad"]
---
# MetaDAO
## Overview
The futarchy governance protocol on Solana. Implements decision markets through Autocrat — a system where proposals create parallel pass/fail token universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window. Also operates as a launchpad for ownership coins through Futardio (unruggable ICOs). The first platform for futarchy-governed organizations at scale.
## Current State
- **Autocrat**: Conditional token markets for governance decisions. Proposals create pass/fail universes; TWAP settlement over 3 days.
- **Futardio**: Unruggable ICO launch platform. Projects raise capital through the MetaDAO ecosystem with futarchy-governed accountability. Replaced the original uncapped pro-rata mechanism that caused massive overbidding (Umbra: $155M committed for $3M raise = 50x oversubscription; Solomon: $103M committed for $8M = 13x).
- **Futarchic AMM**: Custom-built AMM for decision market trading. No fees for external LPs — all fees go to the protocol. ~20% of each project's token supply is in the Futarchic AMM LP. LP cannot be withdrawn during active markets.
- **Financial**: $85.7M market cap, $219M ecosystem market cap ($69M non-META). Total revenue $3.1M+ (Q4 2025 alone: $2.51M). Total equity $16.5M, 15+ quarters runway.
- **Ecosystem**: 8 curated ICOs raising $25.6M total (through Dec 2025) + 45 permissionless Futardio launches
- **Treasury**: Active management via subcommittee proposals (see Solomon DP-00001). Omnibus proposal migrated ~90% of META liquidity into Futarchy AMM and burned ~60K META.
- **Known limitation**: Limited trading volume in uncontested decisions — when community consensus is obvious, conditional markets add little information
## Timeline
- **2023** — MetaDAO founded by Proph3t
- **2024** — Autocrat deployed; early governance proposals
- **2025-10** — Futardio launches (Umbra is first launch, ~$155M committed)
- **2025-11** — Solomon launches via Futardio ($103M committed for $8M raise)
- **2026-02** — Futardio mechanism updated (unruggable ICO replacing pro-rata)
- **2026-02/03** — Multiple new Futardio launches: Rock Game, Turtle Cove, VervePay, Open Music, SeekerVault, SuperClaw, LaunchPet, Seyf, Areal, Etnlio
- **2026-03** — Ranger liquidation proposal; treasury subcommittee formation
- **2026-03** — Pine Analytics Q4 2025 quarterly report published
- **2024-02-18** — [[metadao-otc-trade-pantera-capital]] failed: Pantera Capital's $50,000 OTC purchase proposal rejected by futarchy markets
## Key Decisions
| Date | Proposal | Proposer | Category | Outcome |
|------|----------|----------|----------|---------|
| 2024-03-03 | [[metadao-burn-993-percent-meta]] | doctor.sol & rar3 | Treasury | Passed |
| 2024-03-13 | [[metadao-develop-faas]] | 0xNallok | Strategy | Passed |
| 2024-03-28 | [[metadao-migrate-autocrat-v02]] | HenryE & Proph3t | Mechanism | Passed |
| 2024-05-27 | [[metadao-compensation-proph3t-nallok]] | Proph3t & Nallok | Hiring | Passed |
| 2024-06-26 | [[metadao-fundraise-2]] | Proph3t | Fundraise | Passed |
| 2024-11-21 | [[metadao-create-futardio]] | unknown | Strategy | Failed |
| 2025-01-28 | [[metadao-token-split-elastic-supply]] | @aradtski | Mechanism | Failed |
| 2025-02-10 | [[metadao-hire-robin-hanson]] | Proph3t | Hiring | Passed |
| 2025-02-26 | [[metadao-release-launchpad]] | Proph3t & Kollan | Strategy | Passed |
| 2025-08-07 | [[metadao-migrate-meta-token]] | Proph3t & Kollan | Mechanism | Passed |
## Competitive Position
- **First mover** in futarchy-governed organizations at scale
- **No direct competitor** for conditional-market governance on Solana
- **Indirect competitors**: Snapshot (token voting, free, widely adopted), Tally (onchain governance, Ethereum-focused)
- **Structural advantage**: the Futarchic AMM is purpose-built; no existing AMM can replicate conditional token market settlement
- **Key vulnerability**: depends on ecosystem project quality. Failed launches (Ranger liquidation) damage platform credibility. Brand separation between MetaDAO platform and Futardio-launched projects is an active design challenge.
## Investment Thesis
MetaDAO is the platform bet on futarchy as a governance mechanism. If decision markets prove superior to token voting (evidence: Stani Kulechov's DAO critique, convergence toward hybrid governance models), MetaDAO is the infrastructure layer that captures value from every futarchy-governed organization. Current risk: ecosystem quality varies widely, and limited trading volume in uncontested decisions raises questions about mechanism utility.
**Thesis status:** ACTIVE
## Key Metrics to Track
- % of total futarchic market volume (market share of decision markets)
- Number of active projects with meaningful governance activity
- Futardio launch success rate (projects still active vs liquidated/abandoned)
- Committed-to-raised ratio on new launches (improving from 50x overbidding?)
- Ecosystem token aggregate market cap
## Relationship to KB
- [[MetaDAO is the futarchy launchpad on Solana where projects raise capital through unruggable ICOs governed by conditional markets creating the first platform for ownership coins at scale]] — core claim about MetaDAO
- [[MetaDAOs Autocrat program implements futarchy through conditional token markets where proposals create parallel pass and fail universes settled by time-weighted average price over a three-day window]] — mechanism description
- [[MetaDAOs futarchy implementation shows limited trading volume in uncontested decisions]] — known limitation
- [[futarchy-governed permissionless launches require brand separation to manage reputational liability because failed projects on a curated platform damage the platforms credibility]] — active design challenge
- [[DAO governance degenerates into political capture because proposal processes select for coalition-building skill over operational competence and the resulting bureaucracy creates structural speed disadvantages against focused competitors]] — the problem MetaDAO solves
---
Relevant Entities:
- [[omnipair]] — leverage infrastructure for ecosystem
- [[proph3t]] — founder
- [[solomon]] — ecosystem launch
- [[futardio]] — launch platform
Topics:
- [[internet finance and decision markets]]
...